|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Oct 28 2006, 09:55 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Colonel Panic Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 2,880 Joined: 25-March 05 From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Member No.: 3,233 myCENTs:92.74 |
Well, both browser just came out within the span of 2 weeks, and I got the chance to review them.
I posted my review on my website. http://www.ae-net.cjb.net/index.php?a=topic&t=8 Feel free to comment, rant. However, please don't flame unless you have to. xboxrulz This post has been edited by xboxrulz: Nov 2 2006, 07:10 PM |
|
|
|
Oct 30 2006, 05:31 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
SM- the Man -The Myth - The Legend Himself Group: Members Posts: 457 Joined: 4-September 05 From: Drinking da rootbeers Member No.: 8,313 myCENTs:72.48 |
Well besides the fact that IE is like one huge security hole, they lack the useful extensions for the browser as well, but since I made the post about useful extensions for firefox I doubt to many will use ie but just to keep it updated.
|
|
|
|
Oct 30 2006, 10:49 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
S.P.A.M.S.W.A.T. Group: Members Posts: 814 Joined: 22-January 05 From: San Antonio, Texas (No, I'm not dumb. I just moved here...) Member No.: 2,284 |
The main thing I don't like about IE 7 is its flashy and distracting design. But maybe I can get used to it, like how I got used to Firefox's new 2.0 design.
I haven't really tried Internet Explorer 7. Even if they say it's much more secure than the past versions, I'm still afraid to try it. Microsoft will need to come up with a great feature that is unavailable in Firefox if they want me to forget about their past and switch. |
|
|
|
Oct 31 2006, 06:41 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
the Q Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 1,128 Joined: 13-July 05 From: Lithuania, Vilnius Member No.: 7,059 myCENTs:51.86 |
In addition, like for a simple computer user who is not interested to use a computer at all.. not interested into learning how to use it. For example he/she is only interested in browsing the web sometimes for school or work or university etc. to find something in wikipedia or any other resource.. So he/she really wouldn't use Firefox or Opera, she/he would use IE and IE7 having tabbed browsing and more compatibility with CSS is really much better for such a user than IE6. I won't be using Internet Explorer 6 or 7 unless for some kind of tests, but I am quite "happy" that a simple user could have a better web browsing, something like that
|
|
|
|
Oct 31 2006, 06:55 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 128 Joined: 12-February 05 From: St. Louis, MO Member No.: 2,612 |
I actually like the new IE7 design a lot more - although it's pretty much the same - the menu bar is still a Toolbar32 - although in addition to their Rebar, they seem to have added an InternetToolbarHost (to hold the links toolbar) and a DirectUIHWND (for the tabs) - that menu bar HAS moved, to the lower right, and the navigation controls are moved slightly.
It's unfortunate you cannot move the "menu" to a more familiar location - but the addition of all the things that brought me to firefox in the first place will keep me an IE user (although I debug my site from several browsers). All in all though, it's much less cluttered, and fits right into the Windows GUI. I only argue in favor of IE to provide objectivity. It almost seems "trendy" to use firefox, in the same way kids believe anarchy is trendy. I just think it's good to see both sides of the picture. Although, speaking of pictures... has anyone else had problems with transparent .png's in IE? |
|
|
|
Nov 1 2006, 01:21 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Member - Active Contributor Group: Members Posts: 84 Joined: 19-August 06 Member No.: 15,377 |
I am a long-time Firefox user (since it was still called Phoenix), but I have recently been "forced" to use Internet Explorer 7 by an IE-centric website that I frequently visit. I cannot comment much more beyond the appearance of the two browsers, because I have not used either long enough to notice a dramatic difference in performance or features from the previous versions.
Regarding the user interface, I must admit that Internet Explorer seems more elegant and less buggy than that of Firefox. Contrary to what szupie said, I feel Internet Explorer has a good combination of "flash" without going overboard. I suppose the same can be said of Firefox, but Internet Explorer's looks less blocky (I can recognize a similarity with its new Media Player 11). Unfortunately for me (I am no sure if anybody else may have this problem), Firefox also has a rendering bug where a mouse rollover on my tabbed bookmarks will affect the appearance of my tabs. It is not a dealbreaker, but it can look pretty bad at times. Although Microsoft has added "add-ons" to its new browser, it naturally lags in the number of available extensions. Only time will tell whether Microsoft catches up to Firefox. I doubt it. And unlike extensions in Firefox, the Internet Explorer add-ons require you to run an executable file which registers in your control panel. This is an annoyance I would prefer to avoid, so Firefox still wins in this department for me. In terms of performance, Firefox is somewhat sluggish. That may be a function of my own browser with its numerous extensions. Then again, it has become quite bloated compared to its Phoenix days. I cannot say much about Internet Explorer and its speed, because I do not use it enough to tell. In any case, Opera still wins hands down when it comes to speed. Hmm ... a short treatise on the second generation browser wars became a longer reply than I originally anticipated. |
|
|
|
Nov 1 2006, 02:15 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Premium Member Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 381 Joined: 17-June 06 From: Adblock life Member No.: 13,992 |
I don't really see anything wrong with IE7. It seems perfectly fine, especially if you don't want to deal with the hassle of getting used to a new browser. The tabs are great, and I've enjoyed the tab previews. But for me, I think I'll still stick to Firefox, mainly because of the extensions. I can't live without Adblock or Gmail manager these days. And if I really needed IE, the IE Tab extension comes to use as well.
And I don't really think the design of Firefox 2.0 is all that great. It's better than before, sure, but it's still a bit plain. |
|
|
|
Nov 1 2006, 02:17 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Teh Coder Group: Members Posts: 1,053 Joined: 18-April 06 From: Australia Member No.: 12,833 myCENTs:89.25 |
Nice review xboxrulz!
I still personally prefer FireFox as always but I haven't actually went and gotten Internet Explorer 7 yet to try out. Iv'e heard alot of good and bad and read some reviews like yours. It looks like FireFox is still ahead |
|
|
|
Nov 1 2006, 05:35 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Colonel Panic Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 2,880 Joined: 25-March 05 From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Member No.: 3,233 myCENTs:92.74 |
I could've made a more bias review, but I was trying to give out a fair comparisons without bashing it.
I still prefer Mozilla Firefox 2 over it any time. Especially that I'm running on Linux. xboxrulz |
|
|
|
Nov 1 2006, 10:29 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Member - Active Contributor Group: Members Posts: 88 Joined: 1-November 06 From: kent, U.K Member No.: 16,912 |
I understand where everyone is coming from saying about the security issues.
However I have always been comfortable with IE, I guess because I have always used it and never experienced problems. However I know a lot will disagree with me. My point isn't that either browser has vulnerabilities or that one is less insecure than the other. My point is how the conversation regarding these and other insecurities that you just know certain people are racing to find will very likely overshadow the conversation about why these browsers represent advancements over their predecessors. Instead of upgrading to them for their features, the first question will be, but are they secure? Answer: No software except for "Hello World" is 100 percent secure. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 4th December 2008 - 02:54 AM |