Zelda is my favorit one !!!
2) - what do you think of this is a final fantasy a good game ??
Edited by aminzzlink, 18 July 2005 - 06:29 PM.
| |
|
Welcome to AstaHost - Dear Guest | |
Posted 17 July 2005 - 02:41 PM
Edited by aminzzlink, 18 July 2005 - 06:29 PM.
Posted 02 February 2008 - 04:06 AM
Posted 15 February 2008 - 03:43 PM
Posted 15 February 2008 - 05:54 PM
Posted 10 April 2009 - 01:10 AM
hello, in my personal opinion zelda beats final fantasy, by the pure fact that it makes you think a lot more and is made for all ages weather it be 3 to 80.
In the later zelda games such as twilight princess and phantom hourglass you have to of played games like ocarina of time because it adds to its story.
And don't forget that ocarina of time was the first game to have that battle system and have so much to do in one game. Ocarina of time made game history and is still today one of the best games ever made(fact not opinion).
its storyline and ffs storyline are both really good, so it makes them even in that department.
Zelda also teaches people more lessons, such as to do the most selfless thing not the most selfish.
In final fantasy, lets face it the battle system sucks because its been used so much, o and to the person getting the ps3 only get it if you enjoy ff and the ratchet and clank seriies a HELL OF A LOT because the console sucks, its the worst next gen console out.
and youll find that nintendo consoles are built better and roughly the same price.
the play station price value drops so quickly because no one buys them because they ****, the only thing going for the ps2 was its game library.
out of the next gen consoles you should definately get the wii, it has a standard ati graphics chip which means it costs less to repair it and less time to repair it, with the x-box and ps3 they have modified chips so if your looking for games that last longer and are better go with the owners of zelda, purely because zelda and the consoles are awesome!!:P
so in an overall conclusion Zelda owns!!
But zelda shouldnt go to playstation because playstation would spend less time on it like they always do to their games and make it s**t !!
-reply by malachi
Posted 08 May 2009 - 12:22 AM
Posted 26 May 2009 - 06:45 PM
Posted 15 August 2009 - 10:30 PM
Posted 28 July 2010 - 05:24 AM
As someone else said (I don't pay attention to names) how can you compare these? In my opinion, FF is more suited for the older ages. It can have swords, guns, bows, spears, and a whole set of other types of weapon. With Zelda games, it's mainly the same thing over and over again, go through a whole lot of dungeons, get the master sword, go through some more dungeons and kill Ganondorf with the triforce of courage.With FF however, you explore different worlds with each game, come across different challenges, get stronger with every battle, and defeat a new villain for each different game! Not to mention making friends that actually help you instead of constantly rescuing one princess on your own. If you like the real-time combat genre, get Final Fantasy Dissidia.And for the person who said you think more with zelda, you have to pay attention to elements, know when you are in danger, when to heal, when to attack, and a few other things. For the same person, nintendo makes the zelda games so if it did go to a sony product (not likely) Nintendo would still be designing the games.
-reply by Chaos
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users