| |
|
Welcome to AstaHost - Dear Guest | |
CDMA vs GSM
#1
Posted 04 July 2005 - 05:05 AM
Now a days there are two different technology for mobile phones in the world.
(1) CDMA -Code Division Multiple Access
(2) GSM - Global System for Mobiles based upon TDMA ( Time Division
Multiple Access)
There are some countries where GSM is the major technology and CDMA has entered recently like India. On the other side there are some countries where CDMA is the main technoloy and GSM has entered recently like USA, Canada as far as I know.
What you think about these. I mean which technology you like and why??? And which will win in the race between these two in the future.
#2
Posted 05 July 2005 - 09:29 AM
I work in the industry and being from Europe obviously I'd have to say GSM. Technical both technologies are level pegging. Some would argue that CDMA is better quality. But to the average Joe you cant tell the difference.
GSM however is a much more globally standardised technology. For this reason international roaming is excellent with GSM. There is so much international roaming in Europe therefore GSM is used 100%. However CDMA isnt as internationally accepted. Great in your own country but if you want to travel somewhere else the chances are your CDMA phone wont work.
Interestly, the GSM standards group have adopted WCDMA (Wideband CDMA) as the basis for the next version of GSM (i.e 3GSM).
I suppose the debate doesnt really matter as we will all be using WCDMA in 10 years time.
#5
Posted 11 May 2006 - 07:18 PM
#6
Posted 12 June 2006 - 05:35 AM
I use GSM myself, like many people and I believe most of Australia has access to a GSM network, although mine is sometimes non-existent.
#7
Posted 12 June 2006 - 10:22 PM
Therefore, I voted CDMA, but as I said, it's called WCDMA.
In Canada, it's being introduced later this year!
I can't wait!
xboxrulz
Edited by xboxrulz, 12 June 2006 - 10:22 PM.
#8
Posted 13 June 2006 - 07:01 PM
The First GSM phone I had was in Germany through Vodofone. Then when I got back to the states Cingular offered a dual TDMA/GSM phone. I used that for a couple years then switched to a Motoroloa V60 series GSM (I think it was the 170 or 160, I can't remember). Now I have a Razer V3 through the Cingular Go service.
Why I do the monthly plan linked to my debt card just as I did before with the 2-year plans. The nice thing is if I can get a really good deal through someone else, I'll join, if I need to go to Germany for 6Months, I can just cancel my month to month with no $150 fee...it works for me...
#9
Posted 21 July 2006 - 09:27 AM
#10
Posted 21 March 2007 - 11:12 AM
Hi,
Now a days there are two different technology for mobile phones in the world.
(1) CDMA -Code Division Multiple Access
(2) GSM - Global System for Mobiles based upon TDMA ( Time Division
Multiple Access)
There are some countries where GSM is the major technology and CDMA has entered recently like India. On the other side there are some countries where CDMA is the main technoloy and GSM has entered recently like USA, Canada as far as I know.
What you think about these. I mean which technology you like and why??? And which will win in the race between these two in the future.
In Europe, CDMA has never existed... in fact GSM has been arround for decades. UMTS is in fact a technology used in GSM ... So therefore GSM IS the future as UMTS belongs to GSM.
You can also tell this by the fact that the latest phones in US were obsolete in Europe nearly 10 years ago..
CDMA as well as Analogue where dead many years ago.
Edited by SkalariaK, 21 March 2007 - 11:13 AM.
#11
Posted 24 March 2007 - 06:34 PM
-Jordan
#12
Posted 25 March 2007 - 04:45 AM
I would check the coverage maps before actually getting in bed with a cell carrier.
#13
Posted 25 March 2007 - 06:18 PM
In India at least, CDMA handsets do not hold a SIM card. So you can't change your handset (or its not as easy a process). I often bet with my friends and we're shuffling between our handsets, thanks to versatile SIM cards! Besides, CDMA is used for cellular as well as FWT services. In case of FWT, I think that's the best solution for quality.
But of course, GSM is an internationally accepted standard. And people tend to roam. So all odds favor it - for the compromise in quality, we would use GSM technologies in the future. I didn't agree upon that SMS taking a long time to be sent thing though! I've never seen that around!
#15
Posted 11 June 2007 - 01:04 AM
I work for a cellular provider in Canada and we use GSM (huge hint
) were coming out with a new data network I think Verison just beat us to it called HSDPA (High Speed Data Packet Access or something) its pretty interesting double the speed of the CDMA providers network right now. With data and now video calling starting to become the norm it will all depend on data speed not call quality in my opinion.
-Jordan
You work for Rogers Communications Inc.? They are the only Canadian provider to use GSM.
xboxrulz
#17
Posted 07 July 2007 - 12:19 PM
Hi,
Now a days there are two different technology for mobile phones in the world.
(1) CDMA -Code Division Multiple Access
(2) GSM - Global System for Mobiles based upon TDMA ( Time Division
Multiple Access)
There are some countries where GSM is the major technology and CDMA has entered recently like India. On the other side there are some countries where CDMA is the main technoloy and GSM has entered recently like USA, Canada as far as I know.
What you think about these. I mean which technology you like and why??? And which will win in the race between these two in the future.
I think what matters most is the uniformity of the mobile technology. Mobile phones are about communication so it is important to make sure that the message/phone call is sent to the recipient, regardless if it is GSM or CDMA.
#19
Posted 08 July 2007 - 12:02 AM
Here in Australia, the big telco has just starting phasing out the CDMA network to make way for the third generation network it has recently deployed around Australia. This means, by January next year, there will be no more CDMA in Australia!
Does that mean your country can only use 3G phones then? 3G is still quite expensive to use and implement, not ideal for the consumer.
xboxrulz
#20
Posted 08 July 2007 - 01:27 AM
Telstra has almost finished implementing 3G coverage across Australia. Because the 3G handsets can roam on the 3G and GSM networks, this means that people with 3G compatible handsets have more then, i think they said 99% coverage over Australia.
I don't yet have a 3G handset, only because I don't need it. Yes, the extra speed that the EDGE network has is great, but I just dont need it yet. And as you said, its quite expensive! To purchase a 3G phone is very expensive, though Telstra has just released 3G Pre-Paid, which will be good for some people. You can even watch Pay-TV channels on your 3G mobile now!
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











