Welcome to AstaHost - Dear Guest , Please Register here to get Your own website. - Ask a Question / Express Opinion / Reply w/o Sign-Up!
The North Korea Situation. What should be done?
Posted 03 June 2009 - 04:40 PM
What are your views on North Korea? i.e. options like military intervention, Kim Jong-Ils departure,
Posted 03 June 2009 - 11:39 PM
1. kidnap Youknowwho
2. send rambo, fbi, cia to spy and destroy the nuclear
sorry if this hurt some ppl's feeling
Edited by akashi, 04 June 2009 - 08:19 PM.
Posted 04 June 2009 - 06:54 PM
I assume your talking about Kim Jong-Il. I don't think kidnapping him is really an option, for a start getting into North Korea is a problem. Secondly getting anywhere near close enough to Kim Jong-Il is practically impossible.
Also, what about North Korea's sovereignty? The major problem in my opinion is that we don't know what the North Korean's think about Jong-Il or his foreign or domestic policy.
They may be very supportive of his aggressive foreign policy, on the other hand there could (probably are!) be abuses of human rights.
I'd have to agree that he probably is just doing it as some kind of a threat to the rest of the world.
Posted 05 June 2009 - 03:38 PM
A lot of the rewards for deals are so big that they accept them, then break the agreement a few years later, then repeat.
Posted 06 June 2009 - 12:12 AM
Until the other nuke owning countries take the Non Proliferation Treatise and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty seriously, ratify them and take serious steps to disarming their own bombs, then scared backward nations, who have been bullied by the rest of the world for being communist like NK, will want to have some to make them feel less scared and more accepted by the worlds other big powers.
Posted 06 June 2009 - 01:04 AM
btw, the youknowwho probably want to get some economical assistance (again), that's why he threats other country (again). everytime they want to get (economical) assistance or other rewards, they'll break the aggreement. that's only my opinion
Yeah exactly sanctions don't work with them.
The fact that China and Russia are sympathetic to them is also a bit worrying in my opinion.
Posted 06 June 2009 - 12:29 PM
Anyway, I completely agree that non-proliferation is the ultimate long term goal. However, it takes very strong leadership across many states (e.g. not just the US) to disarm your own nukes when ultimately others could keep theirs and then your country is defenceless. This is conversely how arms races like this in the first place begin, take the glaring example of the Cold War. Would you advocate US non-proliferation when other countries, again notably NK and Russia, could maintain theirs and instantly became the worlds hegemonic power.
Non-proliferation is something I completely agree with. Countries waste millions on defence rooted in fear. If all countries were to take a course of non-proliferation countries defence budgets could be halved (or more) overnight with little impact.
Of course this is a very idealist way of thinking about it, and the realist would argue that any nation that cuts its defence budget simply becomes more vulnerable to an outside threat, which in this world of increasingly global terrorism is a view you do have to give some weight to.
However, I do not think the use of nuclear weapons should or would ever really be considered as an option by anywhere. The bombs used at Hiroshima and Nagasaki during WWII showed us the catastrophic effect these bombs can have. The two bombs that killed over 200, 000 people and razed both cities to the ground are now outdated by about 65 years.
Fury you raise a point that is often overlooked but in my opinion very important. "bullied by the rest of the world for being communist". There has been a trend in the Western world to impose democracy upon other countries, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are prominent examples. However, in his recent speech in Cairo President Obama said the USA would no longer seek to impose political systems on to other countries. And I quote "So let me be clear: no system of government can or should be imposed upon one nation by any other." -Barack Obama.
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users