|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Jun 17 2006, 07:39 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 44 Joined: 7-May 06 From: Here. Now. It's all that matters. Member No.: 13,259 |
I got an idea for a toothpaste that you only have to use once a week or something and it keeps your teeth clearn, white and your breath smelling nice.
Basically it is normal toothpaste but with nanobots that latch on to your tooth enamel, gums, tongue and cheeks and break-down bacteria for nic breath. It will also remove food (No more "What is that stuck between your teeth?") from you teeth and in between teeth in a matter of minutes and excrete as a liquid or maybe something that whitens your teeth. Bad breath will be no more because the nanobots are everywhere in the mouth and are constantly removing harmful bacteria that create bad breath. Lot's of other problems such as cavities and rotten teeth will go away because the nanobots are constantly regenerating teeth from calcium, zinc, protein and whatever else is good for teeth. I don't know the current state of nanotechnology but I don't think something like this is possible just yet. I know I would use it, what about you? Any ideas or dream shattering statements (I don't mind, there is plenty of other things to do in life)? |
|
|
|
Jun 17 2006, 10:31 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Premium Member Group: Members Posts: 300 Joined: 25-May 06 Member No.: 13,654 |
Of course it is not possible yet, it would have been in use already
first of all these intelligent nanobots would have to eliminate the 'bad breath bacteria'. However, who says they're bad? There are a crapload of bacteria in your mouth, good ones however, to eliminate dangers like when you put dirt in your mouth. Plus, these "mini robots" would also have to know how to regenerate body parts. How would they know what the correct form of your teeth is, so they ain't building fangs ? Seems like science fiction to me *using 'difficult words' adds authenticity |
|
|
|
Jun 17 2006, 08:50 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
NiGHTFoX - Hiding in the dark Group: Members Posts: 680 Joined: 3-April 05 Member No.: 3,584 |
Of course it is not possible yet, it would have been in use already Actually, I saw a video online about making an engine run on water. It is VERY possible and of course the by-product of water is... water! So essentially, it is possible for that. But that is another topic! QUOTE *using 'difficult words' adds authenticity lol [N]F |
|
|
|
Jun 18 2006, 11:03 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Member [ Level 2 ] Group: Members Posts: 70 Joined: 25-April 06 Member No.: 13,011 |
I would think a bio solution would be more likely especially if it's bacteria you're aiming at but who knows that nanotechnology would bring in the future...like...clothes that mend themselves. lol
|
|
|
|
Jun 19 2006, 08:50 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Premium Member Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 438 Joined: 28-January 06 Member No.: 10,925 |
That would be cool especially because some people don't have the time to brush twice a day or if they just can't be bothered. It's like some toothpastes that are already out that provide 24 hour protection so if the inventors can expand on that then that would be cool.
-HellFire |
|
|
|
Jun 19 2006, 01:11 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Way Out Of Control - You need a life :) Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 2,238 Joined: 16-August 05 Member No.: 7,896 myCENTs:34.00 |
I'm slightly afraid with the "food" part.
If there is a bug in the nanobot multiplication factor, you could easily imagine the bots eating your steack before you finish your dinner ! Then you would see rich people (reach because this technology will probably first be rather expensive) being permanently very hungry exactly like poor people. What about not eating the hamburger you just paid ? |
|
|
|
Jun 19 2006, 02:17 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Whitest Black Mage Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 1,371 Joined: 20-May 05 From: NB, Canada Member No.: 5,281 myCENTs:65.99 |
I've got to first comment that if people dont have time to spend 30 seconds twice a day brushing your teeth...uh...man you need to slow down a bit haha.
As far as the nanotech teeth things are concerned I can't see why its not possible. I mean in order to get the tech that would make this possible I'm sure we'd have the tech to distinguish which bacteria to remove and not to have them bug out and attack out food. I'm not saying it should be possible soon, but I can't see why it wouldn't be. Then again I like often having minty fresh breath then just "non-bad smelling" breath for those 'special occasions' lo. |
|
|
|
Jun 19 2006, 03:19 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 130 Joined: 22-May 06 From: India Member No.: 13,593 |
Thanks for initiating the idea, Sonoftheclayr. But here are the cons- Unfortunately, all human efforts to create something 'alive' have been unsuccessful till date. What you have suggested is an 'active' thing with AI (Artificial intelligence). But that, at this stage is not possible. Microbes and germs have been created just like us - and hence they have the brains to do what they do. It is not possible to (1) Create a biological active creature, (2) That has AI and (3) That would fight other intelligent biological 'real' microbes! I am also sure tat the scientist around the Earth wouldn't be so keen to research on such an idea for the sake of a 'toothpaste'! What we are using right now is artificial enough and further employing it with these technological nanobots would not integrate with our biological system (the human body)!!! Sorry for these 'Dream Shattering Statements' (DSS)* but I believe that its a (tough) fact! *Defining DSS would actually turn out to be a better brainstorm! |
|
|
|
Jun 19 2006, 03:41 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Way Out Of Control - You need a life :) Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 2,238 Joined: 16-August 05 Member No.: 7,896 myCENTs:34.00 |
QUOTE time to spend 30 seconds twice a day brushing your teeth Sorry, but the standard efficient brushing time is ten second per tooth brushing from inside, then ten second per tooth brushing from outside, whic means ten second total for each tooth. A standard guy has about 32 teeth, so the total efficiently brushing time is 300 seconds, roughly five minues. Five minutes is not a lot, I agree, but it's far above 30 seconds. Sometimes, when I don't ear my alarm-clock, I still have 30 seconds, I don't have 5 minutes! |
|
|
|
Jun 19 2006, 04:15 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Whitest Black Mage Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 1,371 Joined: 20-May 05 From: NB, Canada Member No.: 5,281 myCENTs:65.99 |
Well my 'average' brushing is about 30-60 seconds, and I have never had a cavity, eat horrible foods as far as my teeth are concerned, and the dentist has never had a bad thing to say about my teeth... not that this relates to the topic entirely I just feel the need to point out that this is not a necessity but would be a luxury.
Also, if you can forget to brush or not have time to brush now, imagine missing a single brushing when its only once a week? Wait two or three days before realizing and you're getting mouth based infections because your immune system hasn't had to deal with any oral bacteria for years... |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 2nd December 2008 - 11:57 AM |