|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
May 24 2006, 10:45 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 130 Joined: 22-May 06 From: India Member No.: 13,593 |
A matter of $1... Once A, B & C went to a restaurant. After having tea and light refreshment they asked for bill, the amount of bill was $30. They decided to pay the bill amount on equal share. Everybody took out $10 from their pocket and paid the bill. They were yet sitting and gossiping in restaurant, Suddenly the waiter realized that the amount of their bill was $25 and not $30. He took $5 from counter and decided to return it to them. Then he thought they were 3 how will they share $5 ? So he decided to keep $2 to himself and return only $3 to them. He came to their table and returned them $3 with apology. Everybody took $1 and put in their pockets. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Now my question is first time everyone paid $10 Later they get $1 refunded. So everybody paid $9. $ 9 * 3 = $ 27 ..... 1 The waiter put $2 in his pocket. $ 27 + 2 = $ 29 ..... 2 So...... Where is the remaining $1 ???? Start thinking, and soon you'll return to the age when you were taught how to add using your fingers! -Omkar Ekbote |
|
|
|
May 24 2006, 11:28 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 147 Joined: 13-May 06 Member No.: 13,389 |
Hehe.. nice!
The part 27+2=29 does the trick of misleading people into the wrong thinking path. The waitress should have only 2 becoz 27-25=2. What the waitress get is the difference between what A, B, C paid and the actual price. After all, she pockected some money from them. If somehow the bill now becomes 30, which is the original price, A, B, C would then take out 1 each and the waitress would take out 2. 1+1+1+2=5 and 25+5=30. Hurrah! |
|
|
|
May 25 2006, 02:44 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Premium Member Group: Members Posts: 342 Joined: 31-July 05 Member No.: 7,540 |
Very Nice. I love a good puzzle. Anyway, here's another puzzle for you braniacs out there. Answer this one.
Find the next three terms in this sequence: 3, 3, 6, 8, 15, 24..... |
|
|
|
May 27 2006, 10:34 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Geek in-training Group: Members Posts: 301 Joined: 2-July 05 From: Washington State, USA, 3rd Rock from the Star Sol Member No.: 6,772 |
24?
|
|
|
|
May 28 2006, 08:01 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 2 ] Group: Members Posts: 23 Joined: 20-August 05 Member No.: 7,964 |
its 39.. its a fibonacii series..
|
|
|
|
May 28 2006, 08:14 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
PsYcheDeLiC dR3aMeR Group: Admin Posts: 2,242 Joined: 29-January 05 From: Nakorn Chaisri, Thailand Member No.: 2,411 myCENTs:84.36 |
its 39.. its a fibonacii series.. You're quite wrong there Unitechy.. While this ressembles the Fibonacci Series, this doesn't progress like that beyond the first 3 numbers in sequence. An ideal Fibonacci Series would sequentially progress as the sum of the last two numbers. For example: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8..... Here the series progresses a bit differently: 3, 3, 6, 8, 15, 24..... Admittedly, judging by the first 3 in the set, it looks like Fibonacci.. but starting from 4th number it takes a different turn. You'd notice a that from the 3rd term, apart from the sum of last 2 numbers, the term gets padded with a sequence that progresses like 0, -1, +1, +1 ... Let me clarify this a bit further... (if we start by considering the 3rd term).. 3 + 3 + 0 =6 6 + 3 - 1 = 8 8 + 6 + 1 = 15 15 + 8 + 1 = 24 This is where it gets me baffled... and I can't crack the series being padded to the original sequence.. Maybe an example of the 7th number would help me get at it better... though I have a feeling this series would alternate between 0, -1, +1, +1, -1, 0 ... like that... if that's the case, the 7th term would be.. 24 + 15 - 1 = 38 |
|
|
|
May 28 2006, 10:41 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Nenad Bozidarevic Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 1,048 Joined: 7-November 05 From: Belgrade, Serbia Member No.: 9,500 myCENTs:89.26 |
Well, m^e, I've had the same thing as you in mind. However, that way it is quite hard to predict what will go next.
We have: +0 -1 +1 +1 There are numerous possibilities and we can't find what is being repeated. But here's a guess: +1, +0, -1, +1. It is quite stupid, but that way we would get this sequence: 3 3 6 8 15 24 39 62 102 I might have made a mistake when calculating, but this is one of the possibilities. |
|
|
|
May 28 2006, 10:42 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 2 ] Group: Members Posts: 23 Joined: 20-August 05 Member No.: 7,964 |
hmmm.. might be true.. but its quiet confusing..
at one tme -1 then +1 You're quite wrong there Unitechy.. While this ressembles the Fibonacci Series, this doesn't progress like that beyond the first 3 numbers in sequence. An ideal Fibonacci Series would sequentially progress as the sum of the last two numbers. For example: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8..... Here the series progresses a bit differently: 3, 3, 6, 8, 15, 24..... Admittedly, judging by the first 3 in the set, it looks like Fibonacci.. but starting from 4th number it takes a different turn. You'd notice a that from the 3rd term, apart from the sum of last 2 numbers, the term gets padded with a sequence that progresses like 0, -1, +1, +1 ... Let me clarify this a bit further... (if we start by considering the 3rd term).. 3 + 3 + 0 =6 6 + 3 - 1 = 8 8 + 6 + 1 = 15 15 + 8 + 1 = 24 This is where it gets me baffled... and I can't crack the series being padded to the original sequence.. Maybe an example of the 7th number would help me get at it better... though I have a feeling this series would alternate between 0, -1, +1, +1, -1, 0 ... like that... if that's the case, the 7th term would be.. 24 + 15 - 1 = 38 |
|
|
|
May 28 2006, 02:51 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Member [ Level 2 ] Group: Members Posts: 52 Joined: 22-May 06 Member No.: 13,596 |
Heh.. Nice problem there... I think I've heard it before but it's always cool to hear these brain teasers again every now and then..
Very mind boggling! Got anymore cool brain teasers for us? |
|
|
|
Jun 1 2006, 04:26 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Techno-Necromancer Group: Members Posts: 1,018 Joined: 13-January 05 From: The Net Member No.: 2,127 |
Well, except for the 8, it is each number TN where T stands for Term and N is the term number is 3 * FN where F is the Fibonacci term and N is still the same term number. Could it be a typo?
~Viz |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 2nd December 2008 - 12:46 PM |