|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Jun 21 2005, 04:24 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 7 Joined: 21-June 05 Member No.: 6,437 |
I personally like Flash based storage over Hard Drive-based players when it comes to MP3 players just because they are small, sexy, and light. I guess they could really strain your wallet if you had a like, roomfull of CDs needing to be stored on it though...
|
|
|
|
Jun 21 2005, 04:30 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Way Out Of Control - You need a life :) Group: Members Posts: 1,086 Joined: 21-June 05 From: New York Member No.: 6,440 |
LOL. I have the Creative Muvo FM Flash MP3 Player. That's a mouthful
I never bought any of the iPod models before but did hear one good thing about it. Compared to the hard drive iPods and maybe even other mp3 players, the shuffle supposedly has better audio quality. Who needs a shuffle when you have other better alternatives |
|
|
|
Jun 21 2005, 10:02 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Premium Member Group: Members Posts: 284 Joined: 2-June 05 From: Dorset, England Member No.: 5,730 |
i agree. the whole point of artists spending hours in the studio to record their masterpieces is not just in porduce individual tracks. the playlist of an album is nearly as important as the tracks that make it up. i surpose the ipod shuffle is targeted and people who normally listen to the radio and dont really care but just want noise in their ears.
|
|
|
|
Jun 21 2005, 06:09 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Premium Member Group: Members Posts: 311 Joined: 1-November 04 Member No.: 1,290 |
We shouldn't see the iPod shuffle like that, it was made purely to satisfy a market, not to create a decent product and I think it has done that very successfully.
People I know that own iPod shuffles say that they own them because they are smaller and more portable and you get the added excitemeny of not having the faintest clue what you're listening to (which can...somehow be a positive) and so Apple have marketed it for them exactly. If they could add a screen (obviously a good thing) then it would be able to compete at about the same price but as it stand the iPod shuffle is not a quality product but it is good enough for Apple to make an amazing profit from them. |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2005, 11:11 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Bursting with vegany goodness! Group: Members Posts: 342 Joined: 8-April 05 From: Norwich, UK Member No.: 3,753 |
I can really see the appeal of the iPod shuffle - what with it being cheaper and all - but reading this has made me think...
Can't the shuffle function be turned off? I thought it was optional. Making a MP3 player that doesn't play yours songs when you want and only picks them at random seems abit stupid! |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2005, 02:50 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Way Out Of Control - You need a life :) Group: Members Posts: 1,086 Joined: 21-June 05 From: New York Member No.: 6,440 |
The iPod is still kind of expensive if you ask me since it doesn't have all the other features that other MP3 players have. I think for around $99 you can get the 512MB iPod shuffle. But I can get a small MP3 player for around that price that has a bunch of other features (see previous post) that the shuffle doesn't have. The display screen is definitely important.
I never owned an iPod before so I'm not sure how to turn off the shuffle mode. I did a search and found this site. According to what's said there, you should be able to turn off the shuffle mode. |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2005, 04:57 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Premium Member Group: Members Posts: 311 Joined: 1-November 04 Member No.: 1,290 |
Of course you can turn off the shuffle mode, it also saves battery and you can sort of choose an order for your songs (although you will still be clueless as to what the hell you are listening to as there is still no display) and by turning off shuffle it is basically turning off the one unique feauter that was in it in the first place.
|
|
|
|
Jun 23 2005, 06:22 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 2 ] Group: Members Posts: 12 Joined: 22-June 05 Member No.: 6,485 |
I really didn't know how small the Shuffle was until I saw it at a friends house, and didnt even know it was a shuffle (Thought it was a whistle at first)
I imagine itd be easy to lose those things... |
|
|
|
Jun 23 2005, 11:08 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Premium Member Group: Members Posts: 284 Joined: 2-June 05 From: Dorset, England Member No.: 5,730 |
ok then sorry. i take is back if thought that the shuffle feature was non-optional. i mean who would spend millions of dollars of advertising promoting a feature that every music player since the cd walkman can do!!!
if you can turn it off i guess then it is perfectly ok. the design is beautiful and its small and light. no screen a bad thing but i can see myself using it. why did i ever douht apple |
|
|
|
Jun 23 2005, 04:50 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Premium Member Group: Members Posts: 258 Joined: 22-December 04 From: Online, USA Member No.: 1,840 |
iPod Shuffle is really a sweet little device.
A whistle? Funny, but I can see how it might look like a whistle. It is as small as a pack of gum. As for being able to organize the playlist, this is from the website: "DJ Your Day If you favour cycling to a hip-hop soundtrack and snowboarding to a little electronica, Autofill iPod shuffle from a specific iTunes Playlist and roll. Or just drag and drop individual songs from iTunes onto iPod shuffle. With Play in Order mode, you manage the music. If things take a turn for the predictable, never fear. Turn iPod shuffle over, flip the slider to Shuffle and mix on the go." |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 7th September 2008 - 11:41 PM |