 Professional Logos, Are they any good? |
|
|
|
|
  |
 Aug 29 2006, 12:49 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member [ Level 1 ]  Group: Members Posts: 39 Joined: 21-July 06 Member No.: 14,645  |
Hey i have been making logos for awhile now, but still new. My logos have always been way detailed and sometimes cartoonish. I wanted to try my luck at professional looking logos for my website http://ojproductions.net
I know the logos do not match the current style of my site, but i am changing the entire look of the site. I just wanted to know what you guys think of these logos for O&J Productions. Logo 1  Logo 2  So what do you think? |
 |
 
|
|
Aug 29 2006, 01:37 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Teh Coder Group: Members Posts: 1,053 Joined: 18-April 06 From: Australia Member No.: 12,833 |
That's not bad. I really like the look of the second one but it seems far too *high* for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 29 2006, 05:37 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Nenad Bozidarevic  Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 998 Joined: 7-November 05 From: Belgrade, Serbia Member No.: 9,500 |
The second one is far better than the first one. It has a futuristic, 3D look and would nicely blend with a silver/blue/green theme (or so I think). The first one is a bit too shabby, and wouldn't be a good choice for sites nowadays.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 30 2006, 05:47 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Member [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 39 Joined: 21-July 06 Member No.: 14,645 |
Yah i was thinking that the first needs some slight shadow and gradient like the 2nd one
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 1 2006, 06:36 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Member [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 42 Joined: 1-September 06 Member No.: 15,660 |
Yes the second looks by far more professional
 Tone down the blue in the first pic, nowadays people prefer "soft colors", so use a light blue instead. Also what looks good nowadays is a "glossy" look. e: I just watched your site and I like it, like the glossy look 
This post has been edited by tommydanger: Sep 1 2006, 06:37 PM |
|
|
|
|
Sep 4 2006, 07:27 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Member [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 39 Joined: 21-July 06 Member No.: 14,645 |
Yes, glossy is awesome looking i would have to say. I love the glossy look and actually my ojproductions.net site is based on a simple glossy black feel. My new site however will be more "professional" but i have been very busy and yet to keep working on it along with my site hosted here on astahost.com
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 12 2006, 12:06 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 4 Joined: 11-October 06 Member No.: 16,498 |
I like the first more, but they are both good.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 12 2006, 02:30 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 114 Joined: 1-July 06 Member No.: 14,234 |
I agree that the second one is far more professional, well done!
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 12 2006, 06:15 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
the Q  Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 1,017 Joined: 13-July 05 From: Lithuania, Vilnius Member No.: 7,059 |
In fact I think they both are quite good, but both have downsides and if to make one out of those two, it would be really good. The first one has a very bad font, it needs more effects like the second one, and the graphic of the first one is better than in the second one.. etc.
 Well, I think you can do much better by improving them.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 14 2007, 06:31 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 14-January 07 Member No.: 19,510 |
I like the visual direction of the second logo better, but the first logo has better design sensibility.
The first one has: emphasis on the correct part of the logo (the name vs. the symbol). readable name. The second one has: a better symbol; not Futura. As far as improving the second one, I'd say try playing around with the text's position so that it relates to the symbol better. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Topics
| Topics | Topics | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 30th August 2008 - 03:08 PM |