 NOD32 vs. Kaspersky: Which Is Better? |
|
|
|
|
  |
 Mar 18 2008, 12:07 PM
Post
#31
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 1 ]  Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 18-March 08 Member No.: 29,209  |
That's hardly to compared each others antivirus software as everyone's of them have they own pros and cons. But base on my experience Kaspersky is fast and easy to use, so I give Kaspersky a vote.
|
 |
 
|
|
Apr 8 2008, 03:56 PM
Post
#32
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 2 ] Group: Members Posts: 25 Joined: 8-April 08 Member No.: 29,699 |
kaspersky is the best. it catches all viruses, EVERYTHINK! it updates everyday, scans computer very good. so the kaspersky is winner
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 12 2008, 01:31 PM
Post
#33
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 2 ] Group: Members Posts: 20 Joined: 12-April 08 Member No.: 29,764 |
Both is good. But i think NOD32 is maybe better, because NOD32 don't use much CPU and it's automatic updates.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 17 2008, 08:36 PM
Post
#34
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 17-April 08 Member No.: 29,858 |
Kaspersky Internet Suite (AV, Firewall, Ad blocker, Proactive defense, etc, etc, )
Mem usage @ idle- Avp.exe: 2k Avp.exe: 3k Total=5k (roughly) NOD32 Antivirus (JUST the AV, NO firewall, etc, etc) Mem usage @ idle- Nod32krn.exe: 25k Nod32kui.exe: 3k Total=28k (roughly) Anyone who says "NOD32 is the lightest/Fastest" is just regurgitating the marketing gimmic ESET uses to sell their sub-par scanner. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 18 2008, 05:09 PM
Post
#35
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 2 ]  Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 10 Joined: 18-April 08 From: Republic of Kosova Member No.: 29,876 |
I have used NOD32 but havent been very satisfied with it, it really didnt take much resources and didnt lag or frezee my computer but a lot of viruses and particulary trojans got away un-dedected; even though I was updating and scanning my computer regulary.
Since than I started using Kaspersky Internet Security 7 and I am very satisfied with this program, its not just an antivirus, it also cleans up your computer from trojans, dialers, website hijacers and such. It updates automatically and scans all running processess on Windows. I also like the firewall a lot. Overal I would chose Kaspersky antivirus or internet security 7 before any other antivirus out there. Cheers, Fabrika |
|
|
|
|
Apr 29 2008, 05:13 PM
Post
#36
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 0 Joined: 1-November 07 Member No.: 25,869 |
Kaspersky v/s NOD32
NOD32 vs. Kaspersky: Which Is Better? Kaspersky FTW =) If only it wuz lighter and less bugging with its constant pop-ups :o I've tries NOD32 too it's quite good but less reliable I guess compared to Kaspersky, I say "vote for KAV" the best-est of all ;) -reply by Czarina |
|
|
|
|
May 6 2008, 06:31 AM
Post
#37
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 2 ] Group: Members Posts: 12 Joined: 18-March 08 Member No.: 29,205 |
I've got NOD32 on my computer at the moment, and I'm happy with it.. But I also have to run Spyware Doctor, because sometimes NOD32 misses things. After reading all your posts, I'm going to give Kaspersky a go, because it is obviously highly recommended. On the plus side, it also takes up less processes, which is a major thing for me (running 256mb RAM). I'll post how it goes later.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 10 2008, 04:08 PM
Post
#38
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 0 Joined: 1-November 07 Member No.: 25,869 |
Replying to lolnod
Do that test non-idle.. See how avp.Exe cpu resource grows like the hulk and the memory usage grows.. I tested it with their just released KAV 2009 the past 4 days.. Memory leeks all the way.. I love bitdefender and NOD32 (Used to love kaspersky too but this is starting to change...). -reply by Azzaro |
|
|
|
 Jun 19 2008, 03:32 AM
Post
#39
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 4 Joined: 19-June 08 From: Philippines Member No.: 31,042 |
QUOTE(Soliman @ Sep 14 2006, 12:29 AM)  Richard Marko, ESET s chief software architect said: "Authors of this test have compared the efficiency of proactive protection against unidentified or mutated infiltrations. The tested products were not updated for the period of three months.We achieved the best result in the test, but the real level and efficiency of our detention rate is even higher. Regulary updated heuristics is definitely more efficient when detecting new viruses than the three months old one". Personally, I have proved Nod 2.5 and Kaspersky6 personal at their maximun configuration and Nod 32 continues being even much lighter at resources. Nod 32 is also improving their reactive detection rate surprisingly as AV Comparatives tested. in terms of ram usage.. kaspersky uses a lot of mb's but in terms of strick protection kaspersky gives you security as long as you have the working key.. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 13 2008, 07:50 AM
Post
#40
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 0 Joined: 1-November 07 Member No.: 25,869 |
Both are great. My computers (I have them 2) used to work a bit slower with kaspersky, although nod 32 doesn't catch Microsoft's built-in info senders (which I consider as viruses). I' ve heard about it before and recently I've ran up to this fact myself, while installing Zune theme. Kaspersky 7 blocked and deleted a kind of riskware application (info sender) during installation, while nod 32 kept itself quite. It seems Microsoft indeed does have some kind of deal with Eset.
-reply by Guaram |
|
|
|
|
Similar Topics
| Topics | Topics | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 12th October 2008 - 11:30 AM |