|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Jul 11 2008, 02:08 PM
Post
#31
|
|
|
Member [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 31 Joined: 2-July 08 Member No.: 31,264 |
i recommend debian or some os based on debian..
debian is very easy and have a lot of debians translated for you language.. here in brazil, there is. i learned a lot of things about linux using debian.. and apt-get is like a gift hehehe |
|
|
|
Jul 12 2008, 02:02 AM
Post
#32
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 137 Joined: 8-January 08 Member No.: 27,477 myCENTs:48.54 |
For your 64 MB system, I suggest you consider buying some more RAM, specifically, 128 MB that is compatible with what you already have. I have upgraded several computers using "old" RAM from others, and I can tell you this much from direct experience.
I agree with the recommendation of DSL if you want to stay with 64 MB, and even if you upgrade the memory, if the CPU is slow. DSL is Damn Small Linux, for those of you in Rio Linda. For you lurkers, note that DSL does not support some recent hardware. It uses the 2.4 kernel, so many of the latest additions are not in it. This is how it manages to run in limited memory, but it may be the best choice on older systems. To highlight a few things from the DSL Information Page -- Damn Small is small enough and smart enough to do the following things:
|
|
|
|
Jul 12 2008, 04:30 AM
Post
#33
|
|
|
Colonel Panic Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 2,850 Joined: 25-March 05 From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Member No.: 3,233 myCENTs:98.66 |
If you run Linux with less than 128MB RAM, the X server that renders graphics on your system will have trouble running since that's the bare minimum to run X Server.
xboxrulz |
|
|
|
Jul 12 2008, 05:08 AM
Post
#34
|
|
|
Super Member Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 738 Joined: 12-July 06 From: Ontario, Canada Member No.: 14,464 |
For your 64 MB system, I suggest you consider buying some more RAM, specifically, 128 MB that is compatible with what you already have. I have upgraded several computers using "old" RAM from others, and I can tell you this much from direct experience.
I agree with the recommendation of DSL if you want to stay with 64 MB, and even if you upgrade the memory, if the CPU is slow. DSL is Damn Small Linux, for those of you in Rio Linda. For you lurkers, note that DSL does not support some recent hardware. It uses the 2.4 kernel, so many of the latest additions are not in it. This is how it manages to run in limited memory, but it may be the best choice on older systems. To highlight a few things from the DSL Information Page -- Damn Small is small enough and smart enough to do the following things:
Thanks for that information but I threw out the old computer and just kept the hard drive. |
|
|
|
Jul 27 2008, 08:54 PM
Post
#35
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 27-July 08 Member No.: 31,686 |
Fedora----fedora---Fedora
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd November 2008 - 10:58 PM |