Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )



6 Pages V  « < 4 5 6  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Norton Or Kaspersky: Which Is Better?
Emusic.SR.mN
post Jul 9 2008, 03:32 PM
Post #51


Newbie [ Level 1 ]
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 9
Joined: 8-July 08
Member No.: 31,352



QUOTE(pat23 @ Oct 16 2005, 11:57 AM) *
Which of this two antivirus programs are better? NORTON or KASPERSKY? My copy of Norton is going to expire in a month, and i am just getting something esle. But i want to know which is better?

Norton is well known the antivirus world, and are okay.

Kaspersky has been recommeded by a few freinds and my prevouis webhost.

So which one do you all think is better?


Kaspersky is better. Norton is making computer slow and noting doing with viruses. I recommend you use KAV2009.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
iGuest
post Sep 13 2008, 10:08 PM
Post #52


Newbie [ Level 1 ]
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 0
Joined: 1-November 07
Member No.: 25,869



My norton security is just about to expire in a couple of days. I've been looking at both McAfee and Kaspersky and I'm not sure which one to go with. I've read that Kaspersky really uses alot of RAM, any suggestions?

-question by newuser
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jasmine88
post Nov 8 2008, 10:54 AM
Post #53


Newbie [ Level 1 ]
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 8-November 08
Member No.: 34,706



QUOTE(abhiram @ Oct 15 2005, 05:47 PM) *
Kaspersky as an anti-virus is excellent. It's detection methods are much superior to Norton. Norton's database uses an exact copy of the viruses to cross check against with the files on your computer whereas kaspersky uses a method which looks for characteristic parts in the code which can be used to identify a virus.

But Kaspersky's real-time protection is very memory-hogging. I've tried it and it eats away your RAM like crazy. Norton is pretty good for everyday use, but on my comp with 256 MB RAM, I had to chuck it in favour of PC-Cillin which though is not as good as Norton, it uses less memory and it gets the job done.

Why don't you try out one of the free anti-viruses available like AVG or something? Try googling and see if you can find any. I've never tried any of them, but if they do their job well, you can save some money.


Hi,

I always found myself in a trouble regarding the decision to choose from different anti-virus softwares available. Can anyone clear my doubts as i have no knowledge about these What are the criterions to be considered before using any anti-virus software? How to distinguish between good and excellent anti-virus?

Thanks


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jimmy89
post Nov 9 2008, 08:21 AM
Post #54


Living at the Datacenter
Group Icon

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 708
Joined: 30-June 06
From: Australia
Member No.: 14,219
myCENTs:76.93



I have just recently changed over to Kaspersky and I now think that is much better then Norton. Kaspersky's memory usage is a little on the high side, but no where near as much as Norton had on my computer.

The other thing I like is that Kaspersky's subscription charges are less then Norton, only by a little, but it all counts! Overall, i believe that it is a good solution and their support is great!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V  « < 4 5 6
Reply to this topicStart new topic

Collapse

> Similar Topics

Topics Topics
  1. Can't Unistall Norton Antivirus 2005(10)
  2. Antivirus Slows Down Your PC?(49)
  3. Norton Price Rises(10)
  4. Norton AV 2005 Better Than 2006 ?(14)
  5. Is Norton The Best Anti-virus?(34)
  6. Anyone Tried Norton 2006 Yet? Feedback Please(3)
  7. NOD32 vs. Kaspersky: Which Is Better?(52)
  8. Norton Anti Virus Uninstall(2)
  9. Kaspersky Slows Startup?!(2)
  10. Norton Or Mcafee?(15)
  11. Kaspersky?avast?nod32?or Rising(8)


 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd November 2008 - 09:53 PM