Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )



4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> How Many Is Too Many Hard Drives, completely and utterly overloaded
Grafitti
post Sep 8 2005, 02:30 AM
Post #11


Premium Idiot
Group Icon

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 661
Joined: 9-July 05
From: Switzerland, but currently in Pakistan
Member No.: 6,943



I would agree with that. though i definitely could use 10 hard drives with a 200GB+ capacity each. that would make sense, if you're going for insane amounts of storage, and have to stack up the biggest ones available on the market to get what you want. but to layer hard disks with 9 or 20 GB capacity, --- that's something i wouldn't want to do. why go through all the trouble. unless you're just doing it for the fun of it. i don't see that there is a limit to how many you can have; we just heard from yordan @ 1000+ drives. but in a single case, i would think theoretically at least that the number of hard disks would have to be proportionate to the cooling power of the system. i have 2 80 GB SATA hard disks, and the shop guy stuck them in slots right over each other. whenever i would do serious video editing, bam, the computer would freeze up because the hard disks didn't have any air circulating between them. as soon as i switched slots, no more problem.

QUOTE
techocian 
[] Yesterday, 09:59 PM

I've got my own desktop and another that i just mess around with and a box full of junk parts and stuff that i use to put up the messed up Windows 98 computer. I plugged in like 3 hard drives once to that computer and it didn't do me much (Duh! I NEVER use it?). But yes the computer runs an old Athlon processor and requires lots of cooling. Guess what i did? I removed the bottom lid and replaced it with one that has the ventilation holes in it then i placed my case over the Air conditioning vent. The temperature of my room definitely went up but in any case i have a very cold computer to work with. Is something wrong with the picture? Is my computer going to have frostbite?

yeah it could. if it gets too cold. i've heard of people cooling it waay down, but if the parts get too cold then they stick and don't work so well. i'm not sure what the limits are, but there's a minimum on the operating temperature range.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ebbinger_413
post Sep 8 2005, 12:59 PM
Post #12


Administrator [level 69]
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 240
Joined: 12-April 05
From: USA
Member No.: 3,911



yes it is taking up a lot of voltage, but hey, with the server having two power supplies i am fine biggrin.gif biggrin.gif biggrin.gif .... i am working on some other smaller servers to network to and troubleshoot computers...i just finished my unattend cd for xp (using nlite biggrin.gif) so that all my drivers and apps are automaticly loaded...baby...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
baphometslayer
post Sep 8 2005, 07:03 PM
Post #13


Newbie [ Level 2 ]
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 14
Joined: 8-September 05
Member No.: 8,386



I have 2 80 gigs in my setup, occasianally i stick another one in to put mai XBox games in.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
wutske
post Sep 8 2005, 08:23 PM
Post #14


Way Out Of Control - You need a life :)
Group Icon

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 1,077
Joined: 2-August 05
From: Kapellen (Antwerp, Belgium)
Member No.: 7,585



Doesn't that make a lot of noise when accessing the drives ? I have a lot of old drives and they still tick hard when accessing and they make a sreeching noise (what do you except, ball bearing < fluid bearing), I even have a few drives that need active cooling on a chip before it works stable laugh.gif

But, there is practicaly no limit on the number of hard drives, but I don't think Windows ca
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
wutske
post Sep 8 2005, 08:26 PM
Post #15


Way Out Of Control - You need a life :)
Group Icon

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 1,077
Joined: 2-August 05
From: Kapellen (Antwerp, Belgium)
Member No.: 7,585



--oeps, pressed post button AND NO FREAKING EDIT BUTTON --
... can access more than 24 paritions (C: - Z: ), so that should be the limit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ebbinger_413
post Sep 9 2005, 03:06 PM
Post #16


Administrator [level 69]
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 240
Joined: 12-April 05
From: USA
Member No.: 3,911



no it actually doesnt make a lot of noise, and i believe you can download programs that will allow you to have more than that ammount of drives on there by assigning more drive letters (actually numbers or double letters or sumtin...i dont quite remember).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
m3ch4
post Sep 9 2005, 11:34 PM
Post #17


Advanced Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 112
Joined: 29-April 05
Member No.: 4,527



That amount of drives does sound pretty crazy...it's been suggested to reduce the drives and increase the size and I'd go for that.

Unless you have different data on each drive, in which case it would make sense to have all those different drives. Like, one drive for music files, one drive for backup, etc, that way when you go to access the drives you're only pulling specific data from specific drives and not creating a back up of the flow of data (which I guess isn't really a problem, ata/scsi still allow data to flow pretty quick).

I like hte idea of just networking a bunch of computers. If each computer has a pretty small case, and one or two drives in it, it works better in my mind, seperate cooling, seperate power, etc. Plus with giga-byte network capabilities it would be quick to access data as well, if that is an issue to people.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
yordan
post Sep 10 2005, 03:28 PM
Post #18


Way Out Of Control - You need a life :)
Group Icon

Group: [MODERATOR]
Posts: 2,191
Joined: 16-August 05
Member No.: 7,896
myCENTs:34.68



QUOTE(m3ch4 @ Sep 10 2005, 01:34 AM)
That I like hte idea of just networking a bunch of computers. If each computer has a pretty small case, and one or two drives in it, it works better in my mind, seperate cooling, seperate power...

Unfortunately, this is not the tendancy today. Today, the tendancy is grouping blades in a single cabinet : 15 two-cpu machines in the same drawar, a single power supply, a single cooling system. And several cabinets in a single rack. So you will have 50 to 75 cpu's on a square meter...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Casanova
post Sep 10 2005, 07:57 PM
Post #19


Advanced Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 133
Joined: 31-May 05
Member No.: 5,643



Yeah I too believe That you Use Single hard disk If 160gb or so and make 8 partitions if you want ..! As thats better than wasting acess time and power..! i never saw someone use 8 hard disks ... its really crazy to think.! But its ok for servers to have multiple hard disks... If you use it for desktop Then just single hard disk is enough.!

Iam using two hard disks .Totaling 160gb {ie 80+80 gb}
and both have 2-2 partitions {virtually 4 hard disks}
I have noticed that sometimes my system goes slow On acessing another drive .. Im getting slow times in 2 drives god knows how is your system! biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
yordan
post Sep 11 2005, 06:10 PM
Post #20


Way Out Of Control - You need a life :)
Group Icon

Group: [MODERATOR]
Posts: 2,191
Joined: 16-August 05
Member No.: 7,896
myCENTs:34.68



QUOTE
wasting acess time

Nope ! If you have two disks, access time is usually divided by two (30 milliseconds on each disk instead of 30+30=60 milliseconds with a single disk).
So, having a lot of disks is great. The only question is if you want to pay the price of noise and electrical power for obtainint it.
Yordan
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

Collapse

> Similar Topics

Topics Topics
  1. Vista Will Not Support Old DVD Drives(11)
  2. Ibm Hard Drives(3)
  3. External Hard Drives(6)
  4. Large Hard Drives(18)
  5. Partitoning Usb Drives(6)


 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd November 2008 - 10:08 PM