|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Apr 15 2007, 06:46 PM
Post
#31
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 4 Joined: 15-April 07 Member No.: 21,474 |
It looks that you used too much blur.
Maybe a border should work? |
|
|
|
May 1 2007, 02:56 AM
Post
#32
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 1-May 07 Member No.: 21,733 |
UnLike the most important logos that we got.....
Clearly, visibility, impact, presence... sorry, but it havent any of these qualification... |
|
|
|
Jun 15 2007, 06:45 PM
Post
#33
|
|
|
Member - Active Contributor Group: Members Posts: 93 Joined: 11-June 07 Member No.: 22,564 |
Looks cool, you could maybe make the logo as only the letters and make it anti-aliased.
|
|
|
|
Jun 26 2007, 06:52 PM
Post
#34
|
|
|
Member [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 37 Joined: 26-June 07 Member No.: 22,956 |
hmmm... I don't like it really, 5/10 you have to use better tools.
|
|
|
|
Jul 22 2007, 09:18 AM
Post
#35
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 22-July 07 Member No.: 23,514 |
you should add some type of phrase to explain/shed some light.
|
|
|
|
Jul 27 2007, 02:13 PM
Post
#36
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 27-July 07 Member No.: 23,647 |
apart for the blurryness (sp?) it loosk great, i have a tendancy to overcrowd pictures but i like the way you've magane to keep the image simple and neat while at the same time displaying uses of higher level graphical images. where are you going to paste it if its like a logo then I think you should redesign it to be alone make it trendy |
|
|
|
Jul 29 2007, 06:04 AM
Post
#37
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 2 ] Group: Members Posts: 18 Joined: 29-July 07 From: Crayola Crayon Box Member No.: 23,670 |
I like the colors you used for your logo, but I think the blurring was a bit unnecessary. Maybe you just should have left the text crisp and background blurry? I don't know thats just probably what I would have done in your case. Also it would be cool if you could add a border around the logo or perhaps make parts of the picture brighter?, the text perhaps would look nice being a bit brighter so it would stand out more. I like the text you used for the lettering on your logo, I think it really matches the dark eerie green colors that go with it. Ill give you a 7/10.
|
|
|
|
Aug 27 2007, 04:33 PM
Post
#38
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 27-August 07 Member No.: 24,398 |
can somebody rate my logo and maybe help me improve it. I think it works well. ![]() your logo has some view problems. the colors doesn't create a good contrast. I think you need to rethink these colors. The important you need to say us is what you want to communicate with this logo. Then we'll be able to help you better best, |
|
|
|
Oct 3 2007, 09:24 PM
Post
#39
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 4 Joined: 3-October 07 Member No.: 25,302 |
nice logo have u thought of maybe puting a contrasting shadow in there
if u get the position right u could give the elusion it is in the air which could look quite nice |
|
|
|
Oct 4 2007, 02:43 AM
Post
#40
|
|
|
Member - Active Contributor Group: Members Posts: 88 Joined: 5-April 07 From: Cusco - Peru Member No.: 21,283 |
The funny thing is that the most famous logos don't have the most techincal graphics in them. Think of Mars Bar - red whiting with a gold outline on a black surface. Coca Cola - White joined up writing on a red background. McDonalds - A large yellow M on a red background... Make something unique especially if it is going to stand on it's own, but don't necessarily go over board. A good text logo is one where if you changed the text in it but kept the style, people would still recognise. Yeah! but this graphics work great to be stored in your mind. Keep attention on how you eyes reaction at the first Look. Anyway, the diagrammatic of DWA looks very good, like a sports mark. Now keep attention on the "D", does not have the same bright effect as "WA", it seems like a composition. Again, this logo does not talk by its self without a context. Blessings! |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 7th October 2008 - 05:44 AM |