Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )



2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Pirated Copies Of Vista Wont Look Slick
HellFire121
post Apr 15 2006, 07:34 AM
Post #11


Premium Member
Group Icon

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 438
Joined: 28-January 06
Member No.: 10,925



I think microsoft is overprotecting their software, why have an online verification system when you could have something else. It's rediculous. Like that time I had bought a valid windows xp copy and tried to validate it online, it worked the first time but then around a month after when i needed to download a program, it said i had to validate again, i tried and it said my key was already validated. Now that is definately overprotecting their software.
Like someone said before, it isn't even that good, it is just popular.
One day I think windows will fall and the open source oses will be way more popular

-HellFire
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
evought
post Apr 15 2006, 03:14 PM
Post #12


Premium Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 200
Joined: 3-October 05
From: Missouri
Member No.: 8,888
myCENTs:71.12



QUOTE(Quatrux @ Apr 14 2006, 03:49 AM) *

Let them, the less pirated versions of Windows, the more people will start using Alternative Operating systems which are free, moreover, the less Windows users, the less income for Windows and Companies which create commercial software for It and etc.. So I don't think it will be so unPirated as was said above in the Post. And I don't think a lot at the start will change to Vista, due to XP can do a lot and takes less resources, the same was when XP appeared, only after some time a lot of people started using it. wink.gif


Agreed. They are talking about protecting features that Gnome and OS X, Windowmaker (X11 window manager), etc. have had for years now. Heck I remember that being avaliable in NextStep in the early '90's and in '98 or so, I had them under Linux. The underlying problem is that have set up a market requirement to have Windows and charge much too much for it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
xboxrulz
post Apr 15 2006, 04:33 PM
Post #13


Colonel Panic
Group Icon

Group: [MODERATOR]
Posts: 2,890
Joined: 25-March 05
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Member No.: 3,233
myCENTs:37.19



Overdoing anything is not good for you. Even overeating = obesity, overprotection = loss of customer = Windows is now screwed for life.

xboxrulz
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
moonwitch
post Apr 15 2006, 08:41 PM
Post #14


Demonic Enforcer
Group Icon

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 597
Joined: 2-March 05
From: Belgium
Member No.: 2,861



The funny thing is - I used to use legal Windows copies. Yes, you read that right - used to. Why? Because I felt it was the right thing to do. (Mind you this was back in the day of Win 3.11 etc) Honestly, I have found it useless, it doesn't provide better features or as Microsoft likes to put it - enhanced security. That is all BS, why? Because they're "Validation" uses ActiveX - one of the first things I disable in Windows because of the gaping security hole. Why would I run a legal windows? For the updates? Heck, some of the updates have killed my computer - forcing me to reinstall. Yes, I update my windows, but only the bare necessities. Usually I disable a heap of stuff.

Their "excellent" method of Genuine Checks is a laugh, anyone with some common sense can bypass it. But aside from that, who in a right mind will allow his/her computer to have a constant watchful (HA) eye on its software? Soon, we'll see Windows providing us with those wonderfully detailed errors (sadly that is sarcasm - or hopefullness LOL) when we install software such as the Gimp, Blender 3d or anything that is OpenSource. I mean, if they can see our windows key, then it's not very much harder to detect installed software, browser cookies, history, chat logs etc etc. I ain't keen on all of that.

On the topic of Aero look only being available for download - nice move there. The "new and improved special look" was the main feature of the new windows - for not tech savvy users that is, tech savvy users know to steer clear of Vista. I see no reason to try Vista. Oh, I have a 64bit CPU, so I should use or Win Xp Pro 64 or one of the "bigger" versions of Vista. (probably costing 300 or so for a system that still will not utilize the full power of my cpu, while Linux - FREE - does exactly that)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
xboxrulz
post Apr 18 2006, 12:03 AM
Post #15


Colonel Panic
Group Icon

Group: [MODERATOR]
Posts: 2,890
Joined: 25-March 05
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Member No.: 3,233
myCENTs:37.19



truely said moonwitch, but do you still use Windows or have you completely moved away from Windows to Linux or other free operating systems?

xboxrulz
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
plot
post Apr 18 2006, 01:47 AM
Post #16


Premium Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 206
Joined: 4-September 05
Member No.: 8,310



i dont know, im using windows vista 2006 beta 2 and its genuine it must be according to you because it has the aera look and includes everything you said it doesnt include, being translucent windows, animated flipping between open programs, and icons that show thumbnails of opened files.

so i dont know what i did but i have a legidimate copy of windows vista
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

Collapse

> Similar Topics

Topics Topics
  1. "google Copies Your Hard Drive - Government Smiles In Anticipation"(6)
  2. Google Copies Your Hard Drive(2)
  3. Microsoft Leaks Vista Information(8)
  4. Microsoft Unveils Windows Vista 2(5)
  5. Pen Drive Ram On Windows Vista(13)
  6. Windows Vista Too Strict?(9)
  7. Gartner: Vista To Be Last Major Windows Release(4)
  8. Windows Vista Skinner ;](8)


 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 5th December 2008 - 05:13 PM