Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )



2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Windows Live Search, The future of MSN Search
FirefoxRocks
post Sep 6 2006, 12:36 AM
Post #1


Super Member
Group Icon

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 696
Joined: 12-July 06
From: Ontario, Canada
Member No.: 14,464



I have used Windows Live Search for that contest that MSN hosted a few months ago (can't remember if it was a year). It works if you have the BETTER keywords to search with, otherwise it doesn't work that well. It is my preferred ALTERNATE search engine (my favourite is Google+Yahoo).

MSN Search doesn't work that well. It doesn't come up with that many results and Yahoo! generally searches better than it. I don't use MSN Search anymore. After all, Windows Live Search will replace it! smile.gif

MSN (Microsoft Netowkr) will become WLSN (Windows Live Services Network) biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Anthony_
post Sep 28 2006, 08:15 PM
Post #2


Newbie [ Level 2 ]
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: 14-June 06
Member No.: 13,937



Live search is good and all but i think it could use some new and improved featurs like ask.com has where you can veiw the page before going to it and i love the new google page but i alos like the new msn live messenger they did a great job on that but im sure new and improved will be in the near future
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FirefoxRocks
post Oct 30 2006, 01:04 AM
Post #3


Super Member
Group Icon

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 696
Joined: 12-July 06
From: Ontario, Canada
Member No.: 14,464



MSN Search is now powered by Windows Live Search!
See, I told you it would replace it. smile.gif

Anyways, for images, I prefer to use both Google and Windows Live Search. For the web, I'd use Google Search. For everything else, Yahoo! Search, Google Search and Windows live Search. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
saint-michael
post Oct 30 2006, 10:09 AM
Post #4


SM- the Man -The Myth - The Legend Himself
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 443
Joined: 4-September 05
From: Drinking da rootbeers
Member No.: 8,313



Although I haven't tried it myself I do know that live search script is public for others to download and use. I know it's a combo of ajax and whatever else they use.

Seen a wordpress version for it.

http://orderedlist.com/articles/howto-animated-live-search/

I seen a couple of others but I would have search deep again to find them, but the concept is still the same. I think yahoo is using a version of it as well.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
beatgammit
post Nov 11 2006, 05:52 AM
Post #5


Member - Active Contributor
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 83
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Provo, UT
Member No.: 17,161



I've tried live a few times and it works pretty well. I like the clean look (kinda looks like google :] ). I don't like the rest of the page though. It is too hard to find things (took me a few minutes to get used to it). Online portals should be very user-friendly and easy to use. I like google's customizable homepage better than Live's. Microsoft should just get out of the portal business and focus more on their OS and other products. This is Google/Yahoo/Ask's war, not Microsoft's. I like Google the best, and then Yahoo as a distant second (too cluttered homepage).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
knight17
post Nov 12 2006, 12:21 AM
Post #6


Advanced Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 145
Joined: 6-October 05
Member No.: 8,941



I like Live search but it is slow on my modem sad.gif.I have configured my hotmail account with Live at my friends home and when I was using at mine it is not at all loading.
From what I have heard it is really ompressive
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mafamba Team
post Nov 14 2006, 07:03 PM
Post #7


Advanced Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 127
Joined: 31-August 06
Member No.: 15,636



Note: I am not affiliated with any of the sites below.

My favourite search engine is preferably Google, and if like you your second preference or choice is Yahoo, please use: www.magictaxi.co.uk, as they give 50% of their advertising revenue to a chosen charity!!
I would appreciate this, becuase it even searches throguh Yahoo, and gives options for a few more services, and even offers an e-mail solution as well.

I strongly reccomenned that service!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CaptainRon
post Nov 15 2006, 12:40 PM
Post #8


Premium Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 238
Joined: 9-September 05
Member No.: 8,400



QUOTE(Mafamba Team @ Nov 15 2006, 12:33 AM) *
Note: I am not affiliated with any of the sites below.

My favourite search engine is preferably Google, and if like you your second preference or choice is Yahoo, please use: www.magictaxi.co.uk, as they give 50% of their advertising revenue to a chosen charity!!
I would appreciate this, becuase it even searches throguh Yahoo, and gives options for a few more services, and even offers an e-mail solution as well.

I strongly reccomenned that service!!


well these kind of companies just do these so called charity to themselves earn a bit. Charity is what they piggy back on to earn money...

Just Google until something replaces it smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TaMeR
post Nov 16 2006, 06:46 PM
Post #9


Newbie [ Level 2 ]
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 14
Joined: 9-November 06
From: Egypt
Member No.: 17,108



A while ago, it was announced that MSN was going to implement Neural Networking technology into their search engine. I had hoped then that Microsoft would finally take the initiative to use cutting-edge technology to come up with something new, for a change.


So far, I haven't read anything about Live even considering neural networking. I'm starting to think that it was pure propaganda to lure people back to MSN Search. But I suppose that's irrelevant for the purposes of this topic smile.gif


I've given Live Search a couple of tries, and my experience with it isn't that different from everyone else's. It doesn't provide a wide range of search results, which seems to be caused by infrequent and/or inefficient crawling. And the few results they provide are not all that great, really.


So, until something changes, I'm going to have to stick to Google, despite all the dubious actions they've been doing for a while.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
quinciest
post Jan 31 2007, 07:35 AM
Post #10


Member [ Level 1 ]
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 30-January 07
Member No.: 20,045



thanks dude
nice information
i've never regret read this post
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

Collapse

> Similar Topics

Topics Topics
  1. What Is The Use Of Service Packs For Windows?(16)
  2. Windows Not Recognizing Ipod(20)
  3. Sharing Files In Windows Xp Home(15)
  4. Anyone Know Of Any Good Image Editing Software?(24)
  5. Live Telecast Help(1)
  6. How To Make Your Windows Look Like A Mac(22)
  7. A Note To All Illegal Windows Xp Owners(48)
  8. Custom Windows Boot Screen(11)
  9. How To Play Mac Games On Windows And Vice-versa(28)
  10. Solar Laser: Possible Energy Source in Future(4)
  11. Using Same Serial # On Multiple Copies Of Windows(18)
  12. The Best Version Of Windows(42)
  13. Can You Create A Folder Name "con"(18)
  14. Blue Screen - irql_not_less_or_equal(35)
  15. How To Add Administrator Account In Logon Screen(4)
  1. New Windows Live Messenger 8.5 Beta!(13)
  2. Windows Live Messenger(11)
  3. Nba Live 08(2)
  4. Windows Or Mac?(29)
  5. Do Google Search Better Than Yahoo?(15)
  6. Help! Usb Flash Drive(12)
  7. Why I May Be Installing Windows Xp Sp3 Again(8)
  8. Image Problems With Windows 2000(9)
  9. Windows 7(10)
  10. Remove Windows Update Uninstall Information(4)
  11. Upgrade Windows Service Pack Issues(5)
  12. Windows Black Edition(11)
  13. Windows Mobile 6.1 Games Folder(0)


 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th October 2008 - 02:47 PM