Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )



 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Linux And Windows - Both On The Same Partition, it's easy
grysik
post May 20 2006, 10:36 PM
Post #1


Newbie [ Level 1 ]
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 20-May 06
Member No.: 13,560



Linux: choose ZipSlack (Slackware)
Windows: choose Windows 9x

Steps:
0) select (in your mind) one of your partitions for both OS-es (I've selected partition with filesystem FAT16)
1) install Windows 9x on selected partition or copy into sectors binary image prepared before (for example using GHOST program)
2) download ZipSlack Linux and decompress it on selected partition
3) prepare menu for selecting OS after turning on your PC, using files autoexec.bat and config.sys
you can run your linux in this way - LINUX.BAT:
@echo off
\linux\loadlin \linux\vmlinuz root=/dev/hda3 rw
rem where:
rem loadlin.exe if file, which will load your linux into memory
rem \linux\ is directory with decompressed linux & localization of loadlin.exe file
rem vmlinuz is Virtual Machine Linux ZipSlack binary image for loading into memory
rem /dev/ is directory \linux\dev\ and there are many devices handle-files for linux
rem hda3 is partition selected by U (I've selected first (means a) harddisk - hda, and third partition of this disk)
rem you can (or should) select another partition !!
4) download Ranish Partition Manager (PART program) on selected partition (VERY USEFULL THING)
it is usefull for choosing partition from you want to start system (load to memory and running it from there)

HAVE FUN
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Twistit
post May 21 2006, 07:09 AM
Post #2


Newbie [ Level 2 ]
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 20-May 06
Member No.: 13,557



Its nice to know this, but why would i put linux and windows on one partition? and.. this doesnt work with xp btw.. xp loves nfts.. and linux often hates it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
grysik
post May 21 2006, 12:02 PM
Post #3


Newbie [ Level 1 ]
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 20-May 06
Member No.: 13,560



I don't use Windows XP, because I have no control on important things in this OS.
But I've written: choose Windows 9x.
NTFS... Maybe will work, but I haven't tested it, because I don't use NTFS at all.
Why put Linux and Windows on the same partotion ? Oh. Why not ?
Now I ask U: why put Linux and Windows on different partitions ?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
xboxrulz
post May 21 2006, 02:04 PM
Post #4


Colonel Panic
Group Icon

Group: [MODERATOR]
Posts: 2,788
Joined: 25-March 05
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Member No.: 3,233



It's safer to put Linux and Windows on different partition because especially Windows9x will corrupt FAT32. Furthermore, FAT32 doesn't support journalling. Therefore, if your computer crashes, there's no log to attempt to fix a corrupted file or the search for one will take forever. Furthermore, Windows9x will also fragment the FAT32 filesystem. Linux will have trouble operating on it when it's too fractured. That's why you should put Linux and Windows on different partitions. Plus, when Linux is on its own type of filesystem, it operates better. For example, on ReiserFS, when your computer crashes, it checks its journal. Then, it'll repair or delete the nodes that are damaged, then allow you to continue your work. Plus, these filesystems don't fracture because both Linux and the filesystem itself doesn't allow such fractures to happen.

The best way is to have a partition for Linux (choose your own except ext2), another for Windows (NTFS) and another just for DATA (FAT32)

I hope this answers your question.

xboxrulz

This post has been edited by xboxrulz: May 21 2006, 02:05 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jeigh
post May 21 2006, 02:43 PM
Post #5


Whitest Black Mage
Group Icon

Group: [MODERATOR]
Posts: 1,352
Joined: 20-May 05
From: NB, Canada
Member No.: 5,281



Yea I can't see any reason for doing this other then saying that yes, I did it, weee. But from a functional standpoint it seems irrelevant, you lose all the positive aspects of having multiple partitions and don't gain anything except...well...you don't gain anything. Also the windows before xp were so annoyingly unstable with the near constant rebooting and whatnot I'd have no reason to keep windows on my computer alongside linux if my ONLY windows option was pre-xp
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
XIII
post May 22 2006, 12:47 PM
Post #6


Advanced Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 190
Joined: 16-February 06
From: Egypt
Member No.: 11,326



QUOTE(xboxrulz @ May 21 2006, 11:04 PM) *

It's safer to put Linux and Windows on different partition because especially Windows9x will corrupt FAT32. Furthermore, FAT32 doesn't support journalling. Therefore, if your computer crashes, there's no log to attempt to fix a corrupted file or the search for one will take forever. Furthermore, Windows9x will also fragment the FAT32 filesystem. Linux will have trouble operating on it when it's too fractured. That's why you should put Linux and Windows on different partitions. Plus, when Linux is on its own type of filesystem, it operates better. For example, on ReiserFS, when your computer crashes, it checks its journal. Then, it'll repair or delete the nodes that are damaged, then allow you to continue your work. Plus, these filesystems don't fracture because both Linux and the filesystem itself doesn't allow such fractures to happen.

The best way is to have a partition for Linux (choose your own except ext2), another for Windows (NTFS) and another just for DATA (FAT32)

I hope this answers your question.

xboxrulz


It's more safer in fact to run linux only, not both of them, not windows, windows in fact hates itself even, it doesn't love NTFS or anyother file system, it hates us even biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
xboxrulz
post May 22 2006, 04:11 PM
Post #7


Colonel Panic
Group Icon

Group: [MODERATOR]
Posts: 2,788
Joined: 25-March 05
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Member No.: 3,233



lol, nicely said wink.gif

xboxrulz
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shane2005
post Sep 18 2006, 10:02 AM
Post #8


Newbie [ Level 1 ]
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 18-September 06
Member No.: 16,006



That's pretty neat but I don't think that I'd use it really...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

Collapse

> Similar Topics

Topics Topics
  1. Now Linux is ease(9)
  2. Linux SuSE detec you all hareware(2)
  3. You can Play now in Linux(26)
  4. What's The Difference Between Linux And Unix?!?(15)
  5. What Language Is Linux Written In ?(15)
  6. Where To Find Notepad++ For Linux ?(37)
  7. What Made You Switch To Linux?(60)
  8. Psybnc - Howto(4)
  9. Looking For Linux(34)
  10. Virtualization In Linux: A Review Of Four Software Choices(4)
  11. How To Install Linux Without A CD or DVD?(11)
  12. Ubuntu 7.10 + Windows Xp Dual Boot(6)
  13. What Softwares Should I Get To Linux?(6)
  14. Diablo 2 In Linux?(10)
  15. Linux?(3)
  1. What Is Linux(2)
  2. So, I Want To Try Out Linux.(9)
  3. How To Play Music And Movie In Linux? Which Is The Good One?.(5)
  4. Some Usefull Linux Basic Commands And Utilities. Please Add To This List If You Know One.(0)
  5. How To Copy File & Folders From Linux To Windows?.(12)
  6. Access Linux Box From Windows Machine- Putty Tool(2)
  7. Linux For Beginners- Easy To Install(15)
  8. Linux Basic Command - For Storing Compilation Error To File(1)
  9. Choice Of Motherboard For Linux Virtualization(4)
  10. Why Linux?(23)
  11. Which Linux Version For Newbies?(14)
  12. Linux Software Installation Help(2)
  13. I Want To Get Linux, Which One Is Best?(6)


 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th October 2008 - 04:29 AM