|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Jul 15 2007, 10:06 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 2 ] Group: Members Posts: 16 Joined: 25-June 07 Member No.: 22,923 |
Hai ,
I have introduced a Bandwidth Speed Test Service in my website located @ http://www.jbi.in I request you to post your speed test results here : First let me start : Service Provider Details : Service Provider : Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited . Pvt / Govt. : Government Service. Location : India. Promised Speed : Upto 2 mbps Rental : Rs 250 per month ( nearly $6 per month ) [ 1$ = Rs 40] Speed Test Results : My Ip : 59.92.113.38 ( Note your ip will be displayed when speed test result is shown ) My Speed : 784.90kbps Download Speed : 98.11 KB/sec Postion : DSL. Please try to use the same format for posting your results !!! If you like our service please link to us. ( link url : http://www.jbi.in) QUOTE Please don't post fake speed test results . If anyone doubts just pm me the ip address and speed result I will verify whether the member has posted genuine result .
|
|
|
|
Jul 15 2007, 11:08 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Oh come on Mrs. B! Group: Members Posts: 648 Joined: 6-June 07 From: Tasmania, Australia Member No.: 22,422 |
my internet is going too slow atm.
ill do it maybe when its at normal speed. i no another good site for speed test, speedtest.net |
|
|
|
Jul 15 2007, 11:30 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Premium Member Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 286 Joined: 17-June 07 Member No.: 22,702 |
Mine says:
Your current bandwidth reading is: 450.40kbps It's nice to have a very simple bandwidth tester to point your friends to. speedtest.net is OK, but I don't like two things about it: - it's flash based - you have to select a server yourself (this might be its strength in other people's opinion) Does anyone know a purely text based bandwidth tester site? I remember seeing a Youtube video a while ago where they took pictures of the same dual-boot PC connecting to a purely text based bandwidth tester site, first under Windows XP, then under Ubuntu, and making a point about the difference in speed. But I couldn't catch the name of the site. |
|
|
|
Jul 15 2007, 11:35 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Oh come on Mrs. B! Group: Members Posts: 648 Joined: 6-June 07 From: Tasmania, Australia Member No.: 22,422 |
The thing i dont like about speedtest.net is that it thinks im in victoria, but im in tasmania, so it doesnt completely work well.
Cnet have a speed test thing, its got pictures but its fairly text based. its... i cant remember |
|
|
|
Jul 15 2007, 12:13 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Premium Member Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 286 Joined: 17-June 07 Member No.: 22,702 |
I found it, thanks.
It's under http://reviews.cnet.com/7004-7254_7-0.html and it's giving me a reading of 364kbps ... hmmmmm ... |
|
|
|
Jul 17 2007, 04:29 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Super Member Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 660 Joined: 12-July 06 From: Ontario, Canada Member No.: 14,464 |
My results under this:
Service Provider Details : Service Provider : Shaw Cablesystems Location : Calgary, Alberta Canada Promised Speed : 5x faster than dial-up (lite-speed) Rental : Don't know because bundled with cable services Speed Test Results : My IP : 24.109.***.** My Speed : 154.20kbps Download Speed : 19.28 KB/sec Position : ISDN/DSL This speed test is somewhat inaccurate though, I have disabled QoS, am using Firefox, cache is at 50MB, I tested at off-peak hours and the speed is around only 20kB/sec. I have reached download speeds of 30-35kb/sec consistently and a maximum speed of 50 kb/sec for like a moment or two. This however is using the DownThemAll! extension for Firefox. By the way, you have 1 tiny XHTML error in your site, <div align="center"> when using Strict. Just thought I'd let you know. |
|
|
|
Jul 18 2007, 08:24 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Premium Member Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 286 Joined: 17-June 07 Member No.: 22,702 |
I'm not sure whether I should start a new topic for this question, but I am curious to know if you are happy with DownThemAll ... have you tested FlashGet and you didn't like it, then switched to DownThemAll ... can you make a comparison.
I currently have neither because I don't understand the concept of an accelerator. Specifically, I don't get how you can "steal" from your ISP more juice than they give you by using traffic shaping tools. But someone might be able to convince me. |
|
|
|
Jul 18 2007, 12:53 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Living at the Datacenter Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 696 Joined: 30-June 06 From: Australia Member No.: 14,219 |
the way most accelerators work is by caching websites in the background, so that when you want to visit them, they are already in the 'cache', they don't have to be downloaded and are displayed. I'm pretty sure how most of them work (i may be mistaken though). So really, your not 'stealing' juice from the ISP, your just looking at the pages, stored on your hard drive!
-jimmy |
|
|
|
Jul 18 2007, 02:02 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Premium Member Group: Members Posts: 489 Joined: 29-September 06 Member No.: 16,228 |
the way most accelerators work is by caching websites in the background, so that when you want to visit them, they are already in the 'cache', they don't have to be downloaded and are displayed. I'm pretty sure how most of them work (i may be mistaken though). So really, your not 'stealing' juice from the ISP, your just looking at the pages, stored on your hard drive! -jimmy The FF addon actually gets pages from the internet too. Like Opera's fast foward, it guesses your next move, you can set it to guess a lot of clicks (meaning more pages are preloaded). But Opera's is just one button, no preloading. Much better. |
|
|
|
Jul 18 2007, 08:23 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 145 Joined: 6-October 05 Member No.: 8,941 |
Am still on a crappy ***old dial-up connection*** It says its speed is 115.5 while connecting and in reality I get around 120 sometimes, not even 56 sometimes. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 8th September 2008 - 04:42 AM |