Nuclear Fusion The Eternal Energy

	Nuclear Fusion - The Eternal Energy
	Discussion by Admiral Lyoko Samus with 48 Replies. Last Update: March 9, 2005, 12:42 pm (View Latest)	Page 4 of 4 pages.

excellen

QUOTE (wanhafizi)

really interesting idea. really.
before this, i've have stumble upon the same kind of thinking. i've been studying about it and actually tried it. but then, i know i was wrong. it would never work.
remember the idea about "energy cannot be created, only can be converted into another form"?. it true.

the system you have design might have the ability to retain energy (electricity) for some period of time, but then, the energy will slowly dissipiate. why? consider this;
1. the copper wire you are using will impose some resistance, where the electricity will be converted to heat and slowly dissipiate into the sorrounding invironment.
2. the mechanical movement will impose some physical resistance to the wheel and wind. so, again, the energy inside the system will be converted to other energy and dissipiate into the invironment.

this system, at the best will only be able to retain energy

[post="21103"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]

But those factors (friction and resulting loss of energy through heat) would have little effect surely? They wouldnt have enough influence to stop the machine creating more energy than it consumes would they? esides, the machine obnly ever uses a set amount of power anyway. all what friction would do is make it take a little longer to increase the speed, right?

Im sure there is a reason as to why this machine wouldnt work, but I dont think friction is the reason.

Mon Mar 7, 2005 Reply New Discussion

lasto i glemyr

Interesting idea...however, I can see some flaws. So far, nothing has been able to generate 100% efficiency or higher, and it appears to be impossible.

Basically in your system, you are converting electrical energy into mechanical energy, and then with the generator it is being reconverted into electrical energy through back-EMF. I think that, in perfect conditions, this would yield 100% efficiency. However, perfect conditions are unattainable...forces such as friction and heat loss due to resistance in the wires would lower the efficiency of the machine. Therefore, we end up with less energy than what we started with.

Instead, I think that we should try to convert matter into energy, for this actually will generate more output energy than what is input. It is for this reason that, once we perfect it, fusion will be the next big breakthrough in energy...a huge output with little or no environmental consequences.

Tue Mar 8, 2005 Reply New Discussion

shahidiimran

i Thinkif we can control the fusion process then that will be good for world need of feul, that is good advancment...best of luck to world...

Tue Mar 8, 2005 Reply New Discussion

kraizii88z

I think this is another step inthe evolution of nuclear energy and is not a change, oh no, it's just a shift from one dangerous thing to another. It's safer, but not cloe to safe.
consider .. man-made objects do no good for the human body, the planet, or the ecosystems that flourish under "god's natural design" that was designed perfectly for all living things..how can a new system of nuclear energy be safe?