|
|
P2p Programs - Whos The Real Thief | ||
Discussion by XMX LoverBoy XCX with 16 Replies.
Last Update: July 28, 2010, 10:40 am | |||
![]() |
|
|
So unless you are downloading something that's publicly and legally available for the public to freely use, you will be doing something illegal by downloading it.
Don't take my word for this, but from what I heard, if you limit your uploads they most likely won't go after you. I say go with the safer approach and buy the software/music/whatever if you like it. Like you said, it depends on who you talk to. I say it's illegal if you download copyright content.
But downloading something that isn't supposed to be free is stealing either way.
--YB
I remember in the days pre-dating MP3 players where we used to jog around with cassette WalkMans. Most of my tapes were compilations of music I'd recorded off the radio. I was quite happy with the quality, but gradually as the technology improved, I - like many others - embraced CDs and their huge improvement in sound. That of course was the time before we realized that a glorious connective revolution called the Internet was about to unfold in front of our eyes. For a time, original CDs produced by record labels were the staple and backbone of my collection.
Apologies if I'm drifting but what I'm trying to say is that we shouldn't be afraid of technology. Au contraire - we must embrace it whole-heartedly. A lot of people still believe that online file sharing is sounding the death knell for record companies and physical media. It isn't. They will adapt and so will we.
If it's a copywrighted product, you cannot download and use it, whatever mean you use (including going to eastern europe and buy it for five dollars on the market).
Which was the first time that I actually started seriously contemplating a career as a writer. Unless majoring in journalism counted, which I didn't think should have counted because it was mostly school newspaper work. But that's a different story.
My point is just that I started thinking about trying to make a living creating something that nobody else can create quite like I can ... then I started thinking about how much it would suck if someone bought one copy of it then started passing it around to a bunch of other people on the Internet and not giving me any money for it. Would I be able to keep writing if that happened? Sure, but it wouldn't be a full-time profession like I want it to be.
I know, I know - making music isn't the same as writing. I know that bands and musicians have endorsements, merchandise, concerts and other "sideline" things to make money, and that they don't often make a whole lot from the actual album sales. Writers basically profit from sales of the actual work. We don't get tee shirts often.
But ripping someone off is ripping someone off; once I realized this, I started finding legal, fair ways to enjoy music. I'm still a big fan of things like free iTunes codes, but at least I know that *someone* is paying royalties per code that I get, whether I buy a Slurpee or whatever else.
Just because a user refuses to upload songs doesn't mean that he isn't contributing to copyright theft. SOMEONE has to make the download available so that said user can get it on his hard drive in the first place. And the user isn't paying for it. Granted, many people will buy the CD or at least the single if they really like it ... but there are plenty of services that let us buy the song outright whenever we want it (iTunes, Napster are a couple of examples).
I know that different countries treat the issue in their own ways, but I still think that we should all find some way to help support the things that we enjoy. Even if it's just something small like buying a ten-dollar tee shirt from a local band that we like hearing.
QUOTE (sparx)
Apologies if I'm drifting but what I'm trying to say is that we shouldn't be afraid of technology. Au contraire - we must embrace it whole-heartedly. A lot of people still believe that online file sharing is sounding the death knell for record companies and physical media. It isn't. They will adapt and so will we.Record labels have really started to get into online purchases for songs. It's great because CD singles just haven't been very popular in the last few years or so (that section of the record store is getting smaller and smaller, it seems). If online downloads can replace said singles, then the industry won't have any problem capitalizing on this technology.
Information is the most common form of communication take names for example would it be fair to charge people money for a name like kevin joe smith bob no ti wouldnt music tacks play only a small portion in record buisness they sell merchandise autographed merchandise information is something that shouldnt cost record companies should see p2p programs as pure advertisement that sales the merchandise think how much money alone the artist and record companies make off of the theaters t-shirts guitars and various other musical equipment signature postes and jewelry concerts and so much more music and movies are just a small fraction of what makes the money
-reply by Dean Lockdrum
QUOTE (aloKNsh)
told that 99.9% netizens in the world had at least once done some illegal stuff. You just cant stop it nowLink: view Post: 147219
Probably a lot of people are doing illegal things. However, talking about illegal things are not allowed here. And explaining people how to do illegal things is punished in most of countries.
QUOTE (yordan)
Probably a lot of people are doing illegal things. However, talking about illegal things are not allowed here. And explaining people how to do illegal things is punished in most of countries.oooh i am extremely sorry yordan! i will watch this now on! but i was just telling about the rules and its effect i didnt have any intention to promote illegal or anything! anyways sorry again !
Similar Topics:
P2P programs(merged)
Google Has Released Packs With Anti...
Real Driving
Midi Control Freeware MIDI Control Software (0)
|
(3) Free P2p 9.01 - Limited Time?
|
HOME 






