|
|
Problem Member | ||
Discussion by vujsa with 6 Replies.
Last Update: July 6, 2006, 3:45 am | |||
![]() |
|
|
I adjusted his warning level and sent an email. I suspended his account for 9999 days. I hope to never see him here again.
vujsa
What is the opinion of the rest of our staff members ?? And OpaQue & MC too need to respond on this.
I try my best to get the fresh content indexed as fast as possible by giving google recent topic links.
This can just ensure one thing.. Google will know that our material is original since we were the first people to show it. This should lead to black listing of other sites who are copying our material.
Even though, the Google thingy is not so important considering the hard work and time invested by our community members in writing those articles and posts.
The copyrights of a forum are partly shared by the owners and partly by the posters. We cannot as such on our free will take actions against anybody. Internet being a free open space, anyone can take or copy anything from anywhere. The posters of the forums have much higher rights to claim a copyright infringement complaint than us.
To claim any infringement, We have to follow DMCA.
More info can be found here :-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Mille...m_Copyright_Act
Take Down Policy as explained by Wiki
QUOTE
Takedown example
Here's an example of how the takedown procedures would work:
- Alice puts a copy of Bob's song on her AOL-hosted website.
- Bob, searching the Internet, finds Alice's copy.
- Bob sends a letter to AOL's designated agent (registered with the Copyright Office) including:
contact information
-->the name of the song that was copied
-->the address of the copied song
-->a statement that he has a good faith belief that the material is not legal
-->a statement that, under penalty of perjury, Bob is authorized to act for the copyright holder
his signature - AOL takes the song down.
- AOL tells Alice that they have taken the song down.
- Alice now has the option of sending a counter-notice to AOL, if she feels the song was taken down unfairly. The notice includes
-->contact information
-->identification of the removed song
-->a statement under penalty of perjury that Alice has a good faith belief the material was mistakenly taken down - a statement consenting to the jurisdiction of Alice's local US Federal District Court, or, if outside the US, to a US Federal District Court in any jurisdiction in which AOL is found.
her signature - AOL then waits 10-14 business days for a lawsuit to be filed by Bob.
- If Bob does not file a lawsuit, then AOL puts the material back up.
Any suggestions ?
ANd yes, I am still alive
~Viz
Similar Topics:
Shoutbox Display Names Can we fix this? (2)
|
(3) Approval Times
|
HOME 






