|
|
Where To Find Notepad++ For Linux ? | ||
Discussion by XIII with 73 Replies.
Last Update: August 22, 2012, 9:08 pm (View Latest) | Page 1 of 5 pages. | ||
P.S: i don't use WINE so please don't recommend it
Tue Apr 4, 2006 Reply New Discussion
I would say Quanta Plus and Bluefish would probably be editors that come close to Notepad++, so there maybe no need to actually port Notepad++ over to Linux.
I agree that KATE is not really a good code editor, but it is a simple text editor that has some syntax features that would make it acceptable, same would go for the Gnome Editor (gedit).
Cheers,
MC
Thu May 11, 2006 Reply New Discussion
QUOTE (mastercomputers)
Just been looking at the screenshots for Notepad++ and there's really nothing impressive seen from the screenshots, so I take it, it must be the features it has?
I would say Quanta Plus and Bluefish would probably be editors that come close to Notepad++, so there maybe no need to actually port Notepad++ over to Linux.
I agree that KATE is not really a good code editor, but it is a simple text editor that has some syntax features that would make it acceptable, same would go for the Gnome Editor (gedit).
Cheers,
MC
Link: view Post: 77921
I use JEdit mostly, just because I can use it on Mac, Windows, and Linux. It is written in Java, has some platform specific extensions to fit into the native environment a little better, is a good editor out of the box, and has a great extension system with many plugins available. I even use it for general word processing (but then, I am an XML/LaTeX junkie).
There really is no shortage of editors for Linux in general and there even quite a few which run on a good handful of platforms so you do not need more than one program when you switch machines.
Thu May 11, 2006 Reply New Discussion
Tue Apr 4, 2006 Reply New Discussion
Remember I have not used notepad++ but am just looking into it, especially the porting side of things, that's something I enjoy doing.
Also noticed from it's website that it used part of Scintilla, how does ScinTE differ to Notepad++ since that would be interesting to know. Could turn out that writing a new editor using Scintilla might be more effective than porting Notepad++?
Cheers,
MC
Wed Apr 5, 2006 Reply New Discussion
xboxrulz
Wed Apr 5, 2006 Reply New Discussion
How about VIm - you can install it with gui for gnome or kde... Glimmer (which is the proggie I started my first website with).. Or if you prefer a more all around - code completion etc - try Bluefish.
If you dont like downloading extra stuff... Open a terminal, type vi <filename.extension> and there you go
Thu May 11, 2006 Reply New Discussion
xboxrulz
Thu May 11, 2006 Reply New Discussion
Thu May 11, 2006 Reply New Discussion
As far as notepad++ goes, I'm just use to it. I like it's simplicity, and flexibility. Syntax highlighting is good. Overrall I could switch but I fear change.
Sun May 14, 2006 Reply New Discussion
Thanks to all who recommended Bluefish. That's one app off my checklist. =^^=
Sun May 14, 2006 Reply New Discussion
I think the reason why projects such as Notepad++ and other exitst is because Windows completely lacks a good built-in text editor which, if you think about it, is quite a weird thing... A text editor is an utility that you expect to find on any human usable computer.
Seriously people learn to use Vi(m). At least the basics. You might find yourself in sitation where its the only alternative.
Sun May 14, 2006 Reply New Discussion
xboxrulz
Mon May 15, 2006 Reply New Discussion
Tue Jun 27, 2006 Reply New Discussion
QUOTE (mastercomputers)
Just been looking at the screenshots for Notepad++ and there's really nothing impressive seen from the screenshots, so I take it, it must be the features it has?
I would say Quanta Plus and Bluefish would probably be editors that come close to Notepad++, so there maybe no need to actually port Notepad++ over to Linux.
Link: view Post: 77921
why notepad++ more than bluefish / Quanta ?
- vertical selection inexistant under Bluefish / Quanta do it ok
- xml reindentation not found under Bluefish (I mean the 'pretty print' function [via plugin under notepad++]) - I'm perhaps wrong on it about Quanta, there is the 'format XML code' feature, but I didn't understood it...
- tidy function not found under Bluefish [via plugin under notepad++] - Ok under Quanta
- [syntax coloration isn't really good in Bluefish (it doesn't recognize <? as <?php for my instant try) but I've seen this part under dev] - quanta Ok on it
- search through all opened files - even quanta (that appears to be a stronger tool than Bluefish) don't do it
- search through a directory with a file pattern - even quanta don't do it
- different files formats win/unix/mac ; also not found into Bluefish - quanta Ok
- file modification detection with alerts - quanta Ok (and better than jedit that don't give any choice on action !!!
- muti-view (paned views) - even quanta don't do it
QUOTE (Hercco)
Seriously people learn to use Vi(m). At least the basics. You might find yourself in sitation where its the only alternative.
Link: view Post: 78158
I'm far away of the one who wants to kill vi, but under windows at least you can drag your text using the default editor...
I'm personally switching between jedit(too slow), gedit(too simple but always ready) and Bluefish / Quanta since few minutes.
I hope finding an improved, quick, simply rendered and easy to use text editor as notepad++ for linux.
And I'm sorry if I said wrong things about Bluefish and Quanta there, correct me then !
Sun Dec 3, 2006 Reply New Discussion
To Any Linux User (6)
|
(17) Suse 10.0 Won't Install?
|
Index




