|
|
Should We Enforece Signatures Of A Particular Size | ||
Discussion by miCRoSCoPiC^eaRthLinG with 5 Replies.
Last Update: April 19, 2005, 11:41 am | |||
![]() |
|
|
Take a look at this post: http://www.astahost.com/index.php?showtopi...findpost&p=8376
This guys post is a one-liner but the signature image size is over 10 times the size of his post.. lol.. Do you guys think we should enforce signature images to be within a particular height x width ? Most of the ones around Whatpulse size are pretty ok and load fast enough - but ths image alone is 11K (320x240px). Imagine what a whole lot of these would do to page load time... My feeling is to restrict it around the whatpulse region - maybe a couple of 50-100px more heightwise. What do you guys say ?
m^e
P.S. High time to split Programming Forum too - will need a few of you to work together with me in shifting the messages. Trekkie helped out a lot last time and did a real good job...
~Viz
I think a maximum filesize combined with px would be good. For example a signature image can not be bigger than 400x120px and 50KB... it's just a suggestion of course.
~Viz
Thanks to a helpful link posted by moonwitch, I just reread the Board rules. We already have a maximum image size for signatures. It is 590 wide x 125 high, and I think we should enforce this strictly.
~Viz
Similar Topics:
Help Changing Font Style And Size...
{} Changing Font Color / Size {}
Cool Signatures
Approving Our Own Tutorials Is it allowed/ethical (5)
|
(2) You Guys Should All Go Vote Here
|
HOME 





Ratchet And Clank - Size Matters PSP Review
Photo & Signature Compression for Staff Selection Commission SSC Online Application

