KDE Or Gnome. Which Is The Desktop Of Your Choice and why ? (screenies welcome )

	KDE Or Gnome. Which Is The Desktop Of Your Choice - and why ? (screenies welcome )
	Discussion by qwijibow with 71 Replies. Last Update: June 1, 2009, 7:36 pm (View Latest)	Page 1 of 5 pages.

qwijibow

Ever since i started using linux, ive been a KDE user.
Every now and again, maybe 4 times in total, ive tried Gnome.

I dont know why, but i just keep getting drawn towards it, only to then gt scared off, and go back to the familiar KDE interface.

Only this time, ive moved over to Gnome, and i love it !
gnome 2.8 didnt quite work for me, but 2.10 (and the up comming 2.12) have me hooked.

Ive even started un-installing most of my KDE components.

I think in the end, it wasnt that i prefere Gnome to KDE, but rather, i prefere GTK to QT.

KDE just seems so clutttered, and so harsh, thick deep lines, and too higher contrasts (like the way winXP blinds you with that awfull shade of blue)

If you have ever read "the restaurant at the end of the universe" you will understand what i mean when i say that with Gnome.. the desktop is sooo slick, that your eyes will just slide off it if your not carefull.

Dont get me wrong... i still like KDE.

But Gnome is just gives a more minimalist feeling to it all.

the desktop looks soo beautifully vacant.

I have included some screenies of my Gnome desktop with the "water vapour" GTK2 theme, and OpusOS Window theme.

Some people will spend ages customising there desktop, this is pretty much a default gnome desktop.

[Attachment: #274]
[Attachment: #275]

Wed Oct 12, 2005 Reply New Discussion

kaputnik

The truth be told.. I tried out Linux for 6 months because of a whole bunch of hiccups with my Windows.. but during those 6 months I wasn't able to do much constructive production on my comp.

Functionality is the key, and, for a normal person who has a moderate degree of computer usage, I'd say that multimedia, office utilities and products and graphics are pretty essential.

I found it easier to use KDE because of the inbuilt functionality. Unfortunately, I shifted to Redhat, where I lost out on a whole bunch of packaged programs. Installing programs from scratch was a tedious process and re-learning (often unlearning) my basic computing tasks was taking more time than I had available. The little I managed to use was a great experience.

KDE was a lot more simpler than Gnome as far as user friendliness was concerned.

Now however, I've moved back to Windows because I could not ever confidently bring work home because of my inability to learn under Linux fast enough. Windows is very much plug and play. Linux is mind over matter (unless one's been brought up on it). I do believe that most GUI in Linux have a bit of simplifying to go through before the masses take to it.

In India, now, acer has launched notebooks and PCs with Redhat for under INR35000/- ( USD780/- ) which has become immensely popular at the grass root levels. Default GUI on these machines is KDE.

Wed Oct 12, 2005 Reply New Discussion

xboxrulz

My Desktop is currently running SuSE 9.3 w/ KDE 3.4.0, upgrading it this weekend, so here's my screenie I took last week. I like KDE over GNOME because it looks and handles better than GNOME. I did some test on my laptop (701 MHZ Pentium III, 192 MB RAM) and I found that GNOME WAS SLOWER THAN KDE.

This screenshot contains a game screenshot which I placed on my desktop. If you're a Canadian, you should know that there's a problem in the screenshot.

I'm gonna post my laptop screenshot later, it's running SuSE 10.0 and GNOME 2.12.2..

xboxrulz

Wed Oct 12, 2005 Reply New Discussion

qwijibow

lol, thats exactly the type of desktop i hate..

there are no programs running, no windows open, the desktop is not beeing used for anything, but yet its completely cluttered.

you could get a kernel panick, and a memory dump on that screen without noticing the differance :mellow:

Nice game screenie though.. what game is that ?

Wed Oct 12, 2005 Reply New Discussion

xboxrulz

never had a kernel panic :mellow:

, KDE is very stable (in fact the reason why GNOME was created was to be a replacement for KDE because of the QT license quarrel).

The game in the screenshot is Freelancer.

xboxrulz

Wed Oct 12, 2005 Reply New Discussion

abhiram

Here's my newly installed gentoo KDE desktop:

I've tried Gnome quite some times, but I just can't stand it. The arrangement in the menu, the look and feel of it doesn't really appeal to me. IMO, KDE is much easier to use and customise than Gnome.

Another desktop I like is fluxbox. Once you customise fluxbox, it's very fast and lightweight. Of course, windows users will find it a bit difficult to use initially. Most of my friends who used my computer would rather press 'reset' and log into windows than try to break their heads over fluxbox :mellow:

Thu Oct 13, 2005 Reply New Discussion

qwijibow

Ahhhhh Amarok.. possably the most initially confusing audio player, but also one of my favorites :blink:

QUOTE

never had a kernel panic

i was just joking about desktop clutter :mellow:

I guess one of the things that attracted me to Gnome, is that it is part of the GNU/Linux Project.

plus... gnome loads in just under a second... its about 4 seconds for KDE.

Thu Oct 13, 2005 Reply New Discussion

Quatrux

I used both Gnome and KDE, my first expierence was with Gnome, so I thought I will try KDE, I liked it more due to it is more customizable and different apps are available and the k letter looks quite good, but Gnome is not so bad too and gtk apps looks much better there, but of course using GTK to QT Engine I didn't have appearance problems on KDE, what I do not like about KDE that it reminds me of windows.. a little off topic, but another good alternative is XFC which I like. But I still use KDE, just my brother is using XFC. :mellow:

Thu Oct 13, 2005 Reply New Discussion

Jeigh

I like both depending on my mood haha. I used KDE when I first put linux on my box but then at school the comps were all gnome only until this year they loaded on KDE (if you dig enough haha). But yea both are good choices, KDE is good for when I want a more useable look but I often end up in gnome when I'm coding... I dunno the general feel just seems more work-ish to me or something.

Fluxbox is also pretty nice for when you need a light interface on older hardware or whatnot.

Thu Oct 20, 2005 Reply New Discussion

xboxrulz

funny, according to tests, KDE loads faster and out performs GNOME on aa 701 Mhz 192 MB RAM laptop. The OS is SuSE Linux 10.0.

xboxrulz

Thu Oct 20, 2005 Reply New Discussion

abhiram

I've been using Gnome for a couple for a few days now and it is pretty cool. But I must admit that it does feel a bit slower than KDE. The startup is faster but the performance is a bit slower. For example, when I click on the the Applications, Places or Desktop menu buttons, it has a delay of anything between a half second and a second. Of course, that's not much,

, but its instantaneous in KDE.

Fri Oct 21, 2005 Reply New Discussion

thedevil

I am a new user in linux.... started few weeks ago...
and I used genome for some days... but could not grasp as many things... as i was a windows user earlier....

then i tried KDE it is much friendlier than genome i think... i am doing well with kde...

Actually I really feel at home with KDE... the file browser konquerer is better than genome nautilius...
i say... i like KDE

Sat Oct 22, 2005 Reply New Discussion

nopaniers

I have used a lot of different version of KDE and Gnome. Right now I normally use KDE. Having seen some of the screenshots of Gnome, it really does look pretty cool... but for some reason I'm not so worries about it anymore. I like KDE. It does what I want and I don't feel like spending the time to change over again.

You guys do have a point though. I also worry about the "free"ness of KDE.

Speed... nah, I couldn't care less. Both are good performance as far as I'm concerned. Nothing like when I first started and you had to sit there waiting... or when every application had a splash screen so that you didn't think the computer had frozen. We've moved on!

Mon Feb 20, 2006 Reply New Discussion

Jeigh

Is KDE more responsive on other peoples machines? That's kind of interesting.. I haven't used the latest release of KDE that much but back in the day gnome always seemed snappier... maybe I'll have to give KDE another shot hehe. While I actually prefer gnome a bit for some reason, if KDE was more responsive I might switch over or at least give it another shot... I'm big on really responsive controls on a desktop. Eye candy is nice but irrelevant in comparison to the speed :| Well, to me lol

Mon Feb 20, 2006 Reply New Discussion

XIII

QUOTE (xboxrulz)

I'm gonna post my laptop screenshot later, it's running SuSE 10.0 and GNOME 2.12.2..
xboxrulz

Link: view Post: 56544

as of my using for linux, i always used Gnome, it's more comfortable, at least for me, i hate all of these click and use features for kde, alot of them doesn't work at all, i use ubuntu, i tried kubuntu for 3 times, never been on my machine more than 24 hours, never feel rest with it installed even as a backup for gnome, anyway, just a question, how could you install all these programs and games?, i mean which emulator do u use??, i'm using wine but it doesn't work for most things, i hope i can find an answer as i have alot of programs that i need to run it, i use ubuntu on a sony vaio laptop with 650MHz pIII processor and 320 Ram.

Mon Feb 20, 2006 Reply New Discussion