Grafitti
Sep 8 2006, 07:00 PM
| | I want to implement a RAID 1 array in my computer with 2 80 GB drives. However, after reading a bit, (maybe the wrong stuff) I ended up at the point that Windows XP Professional does not support mirroring. I'm not interested in the other forms of RAID to increase performance. with the power outages all the time my primary concern is backing up the data. So is it true that mirroring is not available with XP Pro? |
Reply
wutske
Sep 9 2006, 09:39 AM
There is a way to make a software-RAID1 on XP, you simply have to let it belief it's something better  . Everything is explained overhere: http://variableghz.com/?p=18 . Just remember, backups and everything's at own risk  P.s. if you create a RAID1 using a hardware controller, windows should normaly support it.
Reply
Grafitti
Sep 10 2006, 06:24 PM
thanks. since i can't afford to ruin things, i guess i'll stick with weekly backups. but that definitely would be something to try.
Reply
vizskywalker
Sep 10 2006, 08:57 PM
RAID mirroring should have nothing to do with software. It is usually controlled (in modern systems) by the BIOS controller or the IDE/ATA controller to do invisible mirroring. The operating system should never even know that the backup harddrive exists as a viable storage area. ~Viz
Reply
abartar
Sep 11 2006, 11:49 AM
As an alternative solution, you may even try any of the freeware mirroring software solutions. These software will copy the byte level changes from one hdd to another.- something that you would be looking for in case of mirroring. Some of the mirroring softwares provide various features like: Task log . Lets you know everything while the task is running. Task schedule. You can set any schedule you want: Specified time every day; specified time at specified day; every few minutes in one day; logout; shutdown; start up... Fully automated, unattended mode Run as service in Windows NT/2000/XP/2003. Run task automatically even if not logged in File history. You can backup original files to a third location before synchronization. Never ever lose your data! Fully bidirectional sync. All changes, for example: file deletion, updates and creation, in the main folder will update to the mirror folder; and Vice versa. Continuous, asynchronous, byte-level replication: Captures changes as they occur, ensure sequence of data as it arrives at target, all over customer's existing infrastructure. Granularity of replication: Byte-level replication copies just changed bytes, reduces network use, enables quicker replication and reduces latency.
Reply
Grafitti
Sep 12 2006, 05:28 PM
QUOTE(abartar @ Sep 11 2006, 11:49 AM)  As an alternative solution, you may even try any of the freeware mirroring software solutions. These software will copy the byte level changes from one hdd to another.- something that you would be looking for in case of mirroring.
Some of the mirroring softwares provide various features like: Task log . Lets you know everything while the task is running. Task schedule. You can set any schedule you want: Specified time every day; specified time at specified day; every few minutes in one day; logout; shutdown; start up... Fully automated, unattended mode Run as service in Windows NT/2000/XP/2003. Run task automatically even if not logged in File history. You can backup original files to a third location before synchronization. Never ever lose your data! Fully bidirectional sync. All changes, for example: file deletion, updates and creation, in the main folder will update to the mirror folder; and Vice versa. Continuous, asynchronous, byte-level replication: Captures changes as they occur, ensure sequence of data as it arrives at target, all over customer's existing infrastructure. Granularity of replication: Byte-level replication copies just changed bytes, reduces network use, enables quicker replication and reduces latency.
that sounds like a solution. what particular freeware mirroring software would you recommend?
Reply
vizskywalker
Sep 13 2006, 11:00 PM
I don't know of any, because I've never looked into it, and while that does seem to be a possible solution (and for you, a good one) the problem comes in with the fact that if windows does any changes before the process can load, you may not have perfect mirroring anymore, and it would not be a true raid array. The other problem with this software side mirroring, is you lose a lot of the transparent lack of speed loss true raid provides because the software needs to monitor what is happening with the harddrive, while in true raid, the bios, processor, or os kernel simply lets the mirroring happen and ignores the second drive replies of completion. If you use an addon process or service, Windows may handle completion responses by capturing them, checking if it is needed, then discarding, which considering all the other types of hard drive interrupts that can be sent, can cause slowdown, although in your case probably not enough to cause problems. ~Viz
Reply
Similar Topics
Keywords : raid, 1, array, question
- Raptor Vs Raid
article (3)
Raid Setup & Configurations
(4) Hi, someone asks me if I can setup their computers to use RAID. I read up on this as much as I could
since I have never personally done this before. I read the article here but am quite confused how
it worked in the example given there. They had two 74GB hard drives and at the end they have one
70GB partition and one 34GB partition. How did they get that and is there any space left after those
two partitions are allocated the space? From what I see, it's 35GB from each hard drive to make
up that 70GB for the striping right? The other 34GB is just for "one" of the h....
Raid From 6 Disks - What Mode Is Best?
(7) Hi, I have small question - wonder if someone would be able to give me some hint... friend of mine
have 6 SATA II Raid-ready drives (longer waranty and hot-plugable)... he cannot have more - all are
same vendor, size, and almost serial number as they came in box packed together... just to plug
in... It would be used mainly for securing his programming environment so lot's of small files
(also whole system built from source, and general file backups), there would be RaiserFS 4 on disk
with 4kb node size so small files would be happy. There wouldn't be too big fi....
Looking for raid, 1, array, question
|
*SIMILAR VIDEOS*
Searching Video's for raid, 1, array, question
|
advertisement
|
|