Read Latest Entries..: (Post #11) by xerxes on May 22 2007, 09:43 AM. (Line Breaks Removed)
QUOTE(xboxrulz @ May 21 2007, 04:53 PM) Macs are UNIX based and they are also simple or even more simple than Windows.As I've mentioned, ease of use is one thing. Compatibility is another. No way an OS is becoming popular if it cannot run newest PC games. As for business use, I guess MAC OS X isn't more compatible than linux, and the latter one has the enormous advantage of being ... read more.
Whats crazy is..I rememebr those days Alsi I was working at IBM when Warp was launched..wow that was a great partenership between IBM and MS..LOL!!! And in true MS style ofc they stole most of the ideas and repackaged them...
Microsoft has always been controversial. However thier ability to always start late and yet still take over the market share is amazing. Thier ability to make programs that appeal to the general user is also good.
So the software gaint has its roots in the UNIX, before it ventured out with its own OS Windows.
I suppose that's true... to a certain extent
Even though Microsoft practically started out with Xenix, the following Operating System had nothing to do with Unix... in terms of functionality and structure, at least.
QUOTE
Xenix was released around 1979, less than one year after the foundation of Microsoft's first international office in Japan, then entitled "ASCII Microsoft" and now called "Microsoft Japan". In 1981, IBM awarded a contract to Microsoft to provide a version of the CP/M Operating System. So Microsoft used a CP/M clone, called QDOS, and then released their own version of the Operating System, the famous MS-DOS!
So, actually, even though Microsoft may have its roots in Unix, Windows doesn't! But then again, it's quite arguable that every operating system has been influenced by Unix. DOS, Windows, Mac OS, Linux, you name it! In many cases, OS creators grafted portions of Unix code onto their OSes. I even heard - though I can't be sure - that the head programmer of Windows 2000 was a Unix veteran who employed every Unix trick he knew into Microsoft's new and promising OS (at the time). That would actually explain the gigantic increase in Windows 2000's stability and performance over its predecessors.
Thank you for reminding us of those days, livingston
Notice from WeaponX:
Put your copied information in text. The words may be reworded around but we still catch them...warning issued
If Windows was based on UNIX, that would solve so many hectic Windows problem that we now have today. Security would be so much easier to handle and so much stronger.
Hell, Apple had Apple Unix way before OSX came out. I know somefolks who were early on into the whole Hyperlinking idea that eventually became the Internet. They were all using Apple Unix machines back in the 1980's.
If Windows was based on UNIX, that would solve so many problems
Let's remember that Windows was built with ease-of-use in mind (the reason behind its outstanding popularity among regular users). It's hard to compare that approach, to that of Unix creators. Same applies to both branches of OSs today - Windows will always gain most market share (as there is always more newbies than pros), until they drop the customer-friendly architecture, or a Unix derivative will employ similar compatibility and ease-of-use features. I'm looking forward to the moment when I will be able to launch newest 3D games in Linux, without any performance hits...
Wow LOL, never knew about all that, but I suppose it isn't surprising.
Wasn't there rumours that old Billy G stole from Apple or some such?
Hard to keep up with Microsoft's pre and current history, there is just too much lol.
It's not a rumour, but a fact. Also shown in the documentary Pirates of Silicon Valley
QUOTE(xerxes @ May 21 2007, 07:20 AM)
Let's remember that Windows was built with ease-of-use in mind (the reason behind its outstanding popularity among regular users). It's hard to compare that approach, to that of Unix creators. Same applies to both branches of OSs today - Windows will always gain most market share (as there is always more newbies than pros), until they drop the customer-friendly architecture, or a Unix derivative will employ similar compatibility and ease-of-use features. I'm looking forward to the moment when I will be able to launch newest 3D games in Linux, without any performance hits...
Macs are UNIX based and they are also simple or even more simple than Windows. You don't see that happening, having millions of users flocking to Apple immediately. However, Apple's computer shares are gaining traction since Windows Vista came out.
Macs are UNIX based and they are also simple or even more simple than Windows.
As I've mentioned, ease of use is one thing. Compatibility is another. No way an OS is becoming popular if it cannot run newest PC games. As for business use, I guess MAC OS X isn't more compatible than linux, and the latter one has the enormous advantage of being free...
Express your Opinions, Thoughts or Contribute more info. to help others.
Ask your Doubts & Queries to get answers, So that "Together We can help others!"
Register FREE for AD-FREE
forum, Create your own topics, Ask Questions, track topics, setup
subscriptions & notifications and Get a Free Website w/ Email and FTP.