| | I understand now.  |
| Astahost.com | Mar 15, 2010 |
QUOTE (mitchellmckain @ Dec 15 2008, 10:29 AM) Well that is a worthy cause. No Islam most certainly is not terrorism. Yet it is clear that the Islamic world view IS more conducive to terrorism and I think the main reason is that its support for a theocratic forms of goverment makes Islam a more useful tool for power than world views that do not support theocratic forms of government.My point is not that there is anything inherently wrong or evil in Islam itself, but that it is rightly...
read more.
|
well, J wants you to take this letter down to Stan for him. The point is these major religions both come from Judaism, which I already talked about in a different post so I'll move on at the risk of getting double whammied. These religions are old, and they worked back then. You ever wonder why some Jews keep kosher. It has absolutely nothing to do with being a "good jew" or "bad jew". When this concept was created way back in the day, pork (a kosher keepers worst nightmare) was not edible. You would get sick if you ate pork, it was unsanitary. It would've been like pulling that squished rat you caught in you're mousetrap, microwaving it, and eating it for dinner. NOT A GOOD IDEA. Well, obviously thanks to great strides in technology and the Meat Packing Industries (look up Sinclaires book "The Jungle" if you are considering being a vegitarian  we can now safely eat pork without concern of bacteria and certain projectile vomiting. Not very kosher.So, even though I didn't specifically answer you're questions, I hope that I conveyed my point as valid. Religion is sooo last millenium. Actually, even farther back than that....
The word "ISLAM" comes from the arabic word which means submission i.e. u submit to ALLAH completley.And this is reason ISLAM has become what it has become.
The time when ISLAM was born in Arabia, it was the time when the sword did more talking then the mouth. There was rivalary between the different tribes and there were frequent clashes between the tribes This medival mentality has stayed to this day among some of the ppl who practice this religion ,they commit the most gruesome crime in the name of their GOD, which cannot be justified in any context For many of them who consider themselve true MUSLIMS their religion is greater then anything ,greater then their country and the fellow country men who are non-muslims. (See the case of bombing in London and the condition of Kashmir in INDIA).. I personally have seen and heard many incidents where a muslim kills his freinds(non-muslim) just because of their Holy-War(Jihad)......... In INDIA the muslims dont even sing a patriotic song (Vande Mataram) coz they think its against their religion  QUOTE(Mafamba Team @ Oct 30 2006, 08:58 AM)  Yes, but remember Muhammad pbuh fought wars like the battle of badr. First of all, I'd like to make my stands clear. I don't follow any particular religion. I have nothing against any religion. But the facts remain facts. And I move away from anything that is bad. (I don't follow a lot of routines of my own religion). There are further more facts against the religion. Well, if one says, a religion/holy book is interpreted in a wrong way. (Arguments like "The religion means no harm to anyone; but people interpret it wrongly" Or "The Holy book says great things but since it is written in such beautiful ancient language which not many people understand. Hence people misinterpret it"). Well, how many people in how many places can misinterpret things? May be a specific region. Let's a group of countries... Unfortunately it is not so. The status of women who belong to Islam - in any country - is same. They are deprived of a lot of rights. Forget everything, they can't even enter their own God's temple! (The Mosk or "The Prayer" House or whatever you want to call it). Let's come to the killings in the name of religion. I can't think of a place where it is not happening. May be US, London, Mid-East and of course INDIA. And I fail to understand why only ISLAM does it. (I agree a lot of religions have a bloody past, but now it seems to be the only religion). There has got to be something inherently wrong with the Religion. Nothing will be interpreted wrongly all over the globe. Even if it is misinterpretation, when there is only misinterpretation existing it defines the religion's characteristics. In INDIA whichever part it might be, terrorism can actually be equated to ISLAM. There a lot of names for the organizations. But one can be certain that they are all subgroups of ISLAMIES. Once again, I'm not blaming anything/anybody here, but these are facts. On the other hand, I do believe not all ISLAMIES are terrorists. In fact my best friend is a Muslim. But at the end of the day, there seem to be a lot of beliefs among Muslims which hurt everyone else around. I've seen a lot of obsessive, religious fanatics from various religions. None violent enough to kill/torture fellow human beings. (Just for the sake of religion; never). Even I'm confused now. I'm not really sure if ISLAM stands for peace anymore. It might have been; but definitely not now. If someone has more insight and facts against what I've typed here, kindly enlighten me. In fact I'm hoping someone would!
Well, I'm not a Muslim and not of any particular religion but I would like to share my thoughts on this topic.
What is happening in the Islamic world has actually happened in the Christian world too. What happened to paganistic religion when Christianity arrives? How about the persecutions conducted against scientists/explorers? How about the split between Cahotlics and Protestants and the subsequent persecutions? And other religions in the world has done this kind of stuff as well. What people fail to understand is the power of religion. In the West, there is a separation of state and church. Why do you think there is such a rule? Unfortunately, in the Muslim world, there is yet a separation of state and the Islamic religion. And I do believe that unless there is such a separation, the current conflict that we are witnessing is not going to stop. And the only way this separation can happened is by Muslims themselves. They would have to decide when and how. QUOTE Every religion has had mis-interpretations and in accurate chanegs and beliefs, but do you really believe, heart in heart that Islam isn't taking it a little OTT. Well, I do sincerely believe that the problem lies in the sort of separation of state and church found in the Western world that is not found in the Islamic world. I know of moderate Muslims myself who don't wear the veil and don't go around threatening other people or forcing their religion/culture on other people. But when it comes to contradicting what their religious elders/authorities said, most of them go silent. Religious figures are still highly regarded and most Muslims would not or dare not openly criticize their religious authorities. So, like what I have said in my previous post, only a separation of state and church would solve the current conflict. Extremist religious leaders are not confined to the Islamic world. An evangelical Christian leader in the US, if I'm not mistaken, with the name of Pat Robertson, something like that, once advocate that the President of Venezuala be assassinated by US secret intelligence services. But because people dare to speak up to their religious leaders in the US that it doesn't snowball into a big problem as compared to what would happen in the Islamic world. QUOTE(Mafamba Team @ Oct 28 2006, 08:11 AM) First of all, I would like to start off this post with a clear understanding, that these are mere questions, not allegations or paniful hits against the religion Islam or any religion. I am not that type of person, and would just like to find out the answers to these questions. Only answer if you know a lot about Islam, and know the true facts, not spread around rumours. Q1: Islam constantly boasts about the fact that it is the fastest growing religion in the world, yet do you lay the facts out and let people decide, or do you preach, and preach and then force people to convert to Islam? If so, do you think this is what God wants? Q2: Most of the time we here about everything magnificent that Islam has brought to the world in the past, which is very fair, look at Spain and the expenses of the Middle East etc. - but do you actually take into consideration ever or like to remember the pain and suffering Islam has impacted on other religions that they have targeted nad victimised, ie Sikhism, when the Mughals viciously forced and forced the Sikhs to convert to large extents, where they bricked walls around mere helpless children and boiled people alive. Surely, Muhammad (pbuh) didn't say to his fellow brothers and sisters that there is suffering in the world, so keep on causing to to those who refuse to convert to Islam? Q3: Non-Muslims or non-believers, kafirs go to hell. Is this really fair. Why should a religion set upon where your destiny will lead you, in my case burning the fiery depths of hell. yes yes, we have all thoguhts this and searched on Google, and found that post saying about how all Non-Muslims don't go to hell, it is those who turn against Islam and on Judgement Day you will be filled in with the details etc etc and then if you choose to convert you live happily ever after and if you don't to hell with you all. Is this true, and at the end of the day, if your a Non-Muslim to the end of time, your going to hell, or not? Q4: Everyone is seen equal, and all Moslems belong to a larhge brotherhood etc etc. Is this true? Then why do you constantly argue with the fact that women have so many rights and so forth and so on, when look at the comparison of rights of men to women. I mean women can't marry a non-muslim but men can. Women belong to the men they marry at the end of the day. If they get divorced from thier husband and he wants her back, then she has to marry another man, and most likely sleep with him every night until the thingy is finshed and they can marry again. If a Muslim man wants the peausres of sexual intercourse, his wife cannot deny the man of his needs? Is this really equality for everyone? Thankyou, please answer my questions. I appreciate you clearing up my questions and proving me wrong. Please note I am trying to be least offensive as possible and am truly sorry if I have come across as offensive in any way. On behalf of my Christian faith. I agree that those events happened, however, you should not generalize the muslims with these events. Most muslims live peacefully. In fact even Christians in the past forced people to convert to Christianity. I agree that these methods are not the way God told us to do but because we are just humans, we tend to get outside faith's narrow path no matter how small or big it is. It's not just Islam who did this but other religions as well. Fellow Christians would disagree to your idea just because of its ignorance. There are Muslims who are not terrorists but live a peaceful life. QUOTE(Mafamba Team @ Oct 28 2006, 06:11 AM) Only answer if you know a lot about Islam, and know the true facts, not spread around rumours. I am no expert but I did take a class called Islamic studies at seminary. QUOTE(Mafamba Team @ Oct 28 2006, 06:11 AM) Q1: Islam constantly boasts about the fact that it is the fastest growing religion in the world, yet do you lay the facts out and let people decide, or do you preach, and preach and then force people to convert to Islam? If so, do you think this is what God wants? The more important question in my mind is that, considering the tendency of the followers of islam to create theocratic states which supress the freedom of religion, is this claim that Islam is fast growing, something to fear or welcome? QUOTE(Mafamba Team @ Oct 28 2006, 06:11 AM) Q2: Most of the time we here about everything magnificent that Islam has brought to the world in the past, which is very fair, look at Spain and the expenses of the Middle East etc. - but do you actually take into consideration ever or like to remember the pain and suffering Islam has impacted on other religions that they have targeted nad victimised, ie Sikhism, when the Mughals viciously forced and forced the Sikhs to convert to large extents, where they bricked walls around mere helpless children and boiled people alive. Surely, Muhammad (pbuh) didn't say to his fellow brothers and sisters that there is suffering in the world, so keep on causing to to those who refuse to convert to Islam? How do we compare this with what "Christians" did to the natives throughout the entire continents of North and South America (or Africa for that matter)? The question we must ask is whether this really has anything to do with these religions at all or whether this is a feature of human nature. For we can find plenty of examples in history of equal or greater horrors perpetrated by human beings (Ghengis Khan, Hitler, Stalin, Mao Tse Tung, Pol Pot) which were not motivated by religion, and were sometimes motivated by anti-relgious sentiments. QUOTE(Mafamba Team @ Oct 28 2006, 06:11 AM) Q3: Non-Muslims or non-believers, kafirs go to hell. Is this really fair. Why should a religion set upon where your destiny will lead you, in my case burning the fiery depths of hell. yes yes, we have all thoguhts this and searched on Google, and found that post saying about how all Non-Muslims don't go to hell, it is those who turn against Islam and on Judgement Day you will be filled in with the details etc etc and then if you choose to convert you live happily ever after and if you don't to hell with you all. Is this true, and at the end of the day, if your a Non-Muslim to the end of time, your going to hell, or not? This is not quite accurate. Compared to Christianity, Islam has shown a great deal of inclusivity in the way they have considered Christianity and Judaism, "religions of the book" and thus practically variations of Islam. Of course these opinions have undoubtedly changed among certain Muslims in response to conflicts with Jews and Christians in certain areas. QUOTE(Mafamba Team @ Oct 28 2006, 06:11 AM) Q4: Everyone is seen equal, and all Moslems belong to a larhge brotherhood etc etc. Is this true? Then why do you constantly argue with the fact that women have so many rights and so forth and so on, when look at the comparison of rights of men to women. I mean women can't marry a non-muslim but men can. Women belong to the men they marry at the end of the day. If they get divorced from thier husband and he wants her back, then she has to marry another man, and most likely sleep with him every night until the thingy is finshed and they can marry again. If a Muslim man wants the peausres of sexual intercourse, his wife cannot deny the man of his needs? Is this really equality for everyone? There is a question of whether this is really a matter of religion or culture. And let us remember that attitudes towards women have improved in the west only fairly recently. Go back a couple of hundred years ago in the west and the lot of women is no better than this. That does not mean that I am not concerned by this issue however. When I watch something like the concert "Celtic Woman", and consider the fact that Islamic societies forbid women to develop and share such talents like this, I give great thanks that I do not live in such a society.
To answer some questions and to get my own opinion/facts in:
It was mentioned that Christianity had its own piece of history where it was force converting and slaughtering innocent people. This is true. It is also true that no part of the New Testament condones these acts. The Koran (which I've read), on the other hand, condones violence against non-believers and forced conversions. It condones sex with children and war on infidels. The book itself looks like it was written by someone with multiple personalities, as in some parts it claims that Jews and Christians (making it the ONLY holy book in the world to specifically name another religion) are people of the book, and in other parts it calls them infidels. Near the beginning of the book, it is made quite clear that Islam should be spread by force of arms. It is also quite clear that women are not only second class citizens, but are virtually slaves. I know that women in most religions, such as Judaism and Christianity, have been treated as second class in the past, and the bible condones it, but the bible does not condone the beating or stoning of women. The Koran does. There are specific issues with Muslim faith, such as the extremist parts of the Koran. These parts are the guidelines for Islamofascism. If there weren't something wrong with the religion, then Islamofascism wouldn't be so prominent in the world today, where we have things such as mass media and the internet where people can learn. In the dark ages, the only source of information was the church, and much of the church was corrupt. Today, there is plenty of sources of information, all easily accessible, and no excuse for the ignorance that exists is the extremist end of the Muslim world.
well I juzz joined this Forum and by the grace of God Im am a Muslim.
First of all I would like to request that dont say anything by yourselff like quran says this or quran says dattt ...plzzz give the reference so that I can explain the whole context to u guyzzz biczz I know that almost all of you haven't read the quran by yourselff. All you know is what you read on an anti-islamic websites where the anti-islamic ppl quote any verse from the quran out of context. since Im not a scholer , I'll quote from the lecture of some Islamic Scholerss.. QUOTE 3. DOES ISLAM PROMOTE VIOLENCE?
Question: Doesn’t Islam promote violence, bloodshed and brutality since the Qur’an says that Muslims should kill the kuffar where ever they find them? Answer: A few selected verses from the Qur’an are often misquoted to perpetuate the myth that Islam promotes violence, and exhorts its followers to kill those outside the pale of Islam. 1. Verse from Surah Taubah The following verse from Surah Taubah is very often quoted by critics of Islam, to show that Islam promotes violence, bloodshed and brutality: "Kill the mushriqeen (pagans, polytheists, kuffar) where ever you find them." [Al-Qur’an 9:5]2. Context of verse is during battlefield Critics of Islam actually quote this verse out of context. In order to understand the context, we need to read from verse 1 of this surah. It says that there was a peace treaty between the Muslims and the Mushriqs (pagans) of Makkah. This treaty was violated by the Mushriqs of Makkah. A period of four months was given to the Mushriqs of Makkah to make amends. Otherwise war would be declared against them. Verse 5 of Surah Taubah says: "But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is oft-forgiving, Most merciful." [Al-Qur’an 9:5] This verse is quoted during a battle. 3. Example of war between America and Vietnam We know that America was once at war with Vietnam. Suppose the President of America or the General of the American Army told the American soldiers during the war: "Wherever you find the Vietnamese, kill them". Today if I say that the American President said, "Wherever you find Vietnamese, kill them" without giving the context, I will make him sound like a butcher. But if I quote him in context, that he said it during a war, it will sound very logical, as he was trying to boost the morale of the American soldiers during the war. 4. Verse 9:5 quoted to boost morale of Muslims during battle Similarly in Surah Taubah chapter 9 verse 5 the Qur’an says, "Kill the Mushriqs where ever you find them", during a battle to boost the morale of the Muslim soldiers. What the Qur’an is telling Muslim soldiers is, don’t be afraid during battle; wherever you find the enemies kill them. 5. Shourie jumps from verse 5 to verse 7 Arun Shourie is one of the staunchest critics of Islam in India. He quotes the same verse, Surah Taubah chapter 9 verse 5 in his book ‘The World of Fatwahs’, on page 572. After quoting verse 5 he jumps to verse 7 of Surah Taubah. Any sensible person will realise that he has skipped verse 6. 6. Surah Taubah chapter 9 verse 6 gives the answer Surah Taubah chapter 9 verse 6 gives the answer to the allegation that Islam promotes violence, brutality and bloodshed. It says: "If one amongst the pagans ask thee for asylum,grant it to him, so that he may hear the word of Allah; and then escort him to where he can be secure that is because they are men without knowledge." [Al-Qur’an 9:6] The Qur’an not only says that a Mushriq seeking asylum during the battle should be granted refuge, but also that he should be escorted to a secure place. In the present international scenario, even a kind, peace-loving army General, during a battle, may let the enemy soldiers go free, if they want peace. But which army General will ever tell his soldiers, that if the enemy soldiers want peace during a battle, don’t just let them go free, but also escort them to a place of security? This is exactly what Allah (swt) says in the Glorious Qur’an to promote peace in the world. Latest EntriesQUOTE (mitchellmckain @ Dec 15 2008, 10:29 AM) Well that is a worthy cause. No Islam most certainly is not terrorism. Yet it is clear that the Islamic world view IS more conducive to terrorism and I think the main reason is that its support for a theocratic forms of goverment makes Islam a more useful tool for power than world views that do not support theocratic forms of government. My point is not that there is anything inherently wrong or evil in Islam itself, but that it is rightly on trial in the court of world public opinion right now where it must prove that it is compatable with the principles of tolerance and religious liberty, which is fundmentally opposed to that of theocratic government. If cannot be compatable with tolerance and religious liberty then it is inevitable that the rest of the world must ultimately refuse to tolerate it. Now I do think that Islam is no less compatable with religious liberty than many forms of Christianity. It has a fine historical tradition of tolerance, but just like these less tolerant form of Christianity there is maturity to be gained and attitudes to be changed. QUOTE (khalilov @ Nov 23 2008, 04:45 AM) I am not defending terrorism, iam defending islam from both terrorists and people like you who say islam = terrorism. Well that is a worthy cause. No Islam most certainly is not terrorism. Yet it is clear that the Islamic world view IS more conducive to terrorism and I think the main reason is that its support for a theocratic forms of goverment makes Islam a more useful tool for power than world views that do not support theocratic forms of government. QUOTE (khalilov @ Nov 23 2008, 04:45 AM) Some of these terrorists you exterminate happen to be innocents who were in the wrong place at the wrong time. Or simply people who disagree with your government. I have exterminated no one, and I have explained that I highly suspect collusion between these terrorists and those who have initiated this so called "war on terrorism". And that is the thing to notice - that terrorism can never serve the interest of people and freedom but will only server the interests of those who want to wield power through fear for the purpose of oppression. Terrorism can only provoke an atmosphere of less trust, less freedom and more violence. QUOTE (khalilov @ Nov 23 2008, 04:45 AM) I said its a tactic, i didn't say its a good tactic that is encouraged in my religiousity. Iam not defending terrorism here. The point is that it is not a legitimate tactic in the accomplishment of any worthwhile goal it is the evil means of people who pursue evil ends. QUOTE (khalilov @ Nov 23 2008, 04:45 AM) That is true, most americans are against Gwantanamo and its gona be closed soon (hopefully), but the damage may have already been done. And iam pretty sure that there are several versions of gwantanamo around the world. To talk of damage you have to presume that there was something better before it to be damaged. Guantanamo happened because the instinct to think that uncivilized behavior on the part of others justifies uncivilized behavior in response. But public opinion has now examined that instinct and decided that it is wrong. That is improvement not damage, and it suggest that in the end the terrorists will fail. QUOTE (khalilov @ Nov 23 2008, 04:45 AM) Again iam not defending terrorism. You are defending terrorism when you make this ridiculous equivalence that says that fighting against terrorism is no difference that terrorism itself.
I am not defending terrorism, iam defending islam from both terrorists and people like you who say islam = terrorism.
QUOTE The extermination of terrorists is not terrorism, it is vermin control. QUOTE Is that what your religion teaches you? Some people think that murder is a tactic for getting what they want, but these murders should be executed. Some people think that kidnapping is a tactic for earning money, but such human refuse needs to be disposed of. Terrorism is not a legitimate tactic for any purpose. It is pure evil and a society which does not understand this, does not deserve to exist. I said its a tactic, i didn't say its a good tactic that is encouraged in my religiousity. Iam not defending terrorism here. Like you said: QUOTE Terrorism is the attack on the innocent public in order to create fear for a political purpose, often to blackmail the governments responsible for the safety of these people. QUOTE The realization that Gwantanamo was not acceptable is a demonstration of how a democracy like the US regulates and impoves its own behavior. There is simply no comparison of this to what was done by Sadam Hussein or Al-Qaeda. That is true, most americans are against Gwantanamo and its gona be closed soon (hopefully), but the damage may have already been done. And iam pretty sure that there are several versions of gwantanamo around the world. QUOTE No you are just defending terrorism which I cannot honestly say is any better. Again iam not defending terrorism. QUOTE(khalilov @ Nov 22 2008, 05:50 AM) So basicly you respond to terorism by being more terorists? If these events help terrorists, then don't do them. And if these terrorists will do such things to their own people and then blame you for it then let them. Atleast you would be innocent of such accusations. But if truly are doing such things, then those terrorists are right as much as you are. I see both Al-Qaeda and US (government not people) as terrorists. Al-Qaeda with their suidal bombers blowing them selves up inside mosques and churches and US (again government not people) with their secret prisons and their abuse of 'Spreading democracy and human rights' in order to make things run their way. LOL Yes this is typical terrorist propaganda. They murder the innocence to provoke fear, disgust and anger and then call anything done about them terrorism. The extermination of terrorists is not terrorism, it is vermin control. Not that what George W. Bush can be justified. I am highly suspicious of what he did and question whether he might actually have been involved in the terrorist attacks especially because of the blatant opportunism in what was done afterwards. I further suspect that he has no desire to destroy Al-Qaeda because they are too useful a tool for justifying armed intervention by which billions of dollars can be made by friends in the Oil and Weapons Industry. QUOTE(khalilov @ Nov 22 2008, 05:50 AM) So basicly you respond to terorism by being more terorists? How would you feel if country x opened its own version of Gwantanamo and filled it up with americans, british and french? I am sure that all victims of terrorists and their families would certainly wish that they were at Gwantoanamo rather than where they are now. So yes indeed I think we would trade something that was so much more civilized by comparison. There were for example no children at Gwantanamo. The realization that Gwantanamo was not acceptable is a demonstration of how a democracy like the US regulates and impoves its own behavior. There is simply no comparison of this to what was done by Sadam Hussein or Al-Qaeda. QUOTE(khalilov @ Nov 22 2008, 05:50 AM) Terrorism is a tactic, Is that what your religion teaches you? Some people think that murder is a tactic for getting what they want, but these murders should be executed. Some people think that kidnapping is a tactic for earning money, but such human refuse needs to be disposed of. Terrorism is not a legitimate tactic for any purpose. It is pure evil and a society which does not understand this, does not deserve to exist. QUOTE(khalilov @ Nov 22 2008, 05:50 AM) You can't start a war on terrorism by following the same tactics because as you said these things encourage and strengthen terrorists, which is happening. Obviously. But we must give no credit to the ridiculous propaganda that anyone is doing any such thing. But of course since you think terrorism is just a tactic for getting what you want then you think that those people flew planes full of civilians into buildings full of civilians because they were particularly clever. QUOTE(khalilov @ Nov 22 2008, 05:50 AM) Don't misinterpret what iam saying, i am not defeding nazism. No you are just defending terrorism which I cannot honestly say is any better. QUOTE The examples you give are examples of injustices due to disrespect and fear, but terrorism encourage these things because how should we respond to terrorism except with contempt and fear. How would you feel if country x opened its own version of Gwantanamo and filled it up with americans, british and french? Would you check if those were terrorists or would you start world war III on that country and say 'Even if these are heartless rapists and criminals they deserve a just trial and a good treatment' QUOTE The truth is that these terrorists want such events to ocurr and if others don't actually persecute the people they parasitically feed upon then they will do such things to their own people themselves to maintain the level of fear and disrespect in society (blaming it on their enemies of course) because that is the environment in which this disease thrives. If these events help terrorists, then don't do them. And if these terrorists will do such things to their own people and then blame you for it then let them. Atleast you would be innocent of such accusations. But if truly are doing such things, then those terrorists are right as much as you are. I see both Al-Qaeda and US (government not people) as terrorists. Al-Qaeda with their suidal bombers blowing them selves up inside mosques and churches and US (again government not people) with their secret prisons and their abuse of 'Spreading democracy and human rights' in order to make things run their way. Terrorism is a tactic, you can't start a war on terrorism by following the same tactics because as you said these things encourage and strengthen terrorists, which is happening. And don't believe that anyone actually gives a damn about fighting terrorism outside their borders. Before terrorism there was communism, before that there was nazism, and before that there was spreading civilized way of life. They just need something to make you accept the decisions they make just like terrorists intentionally misinterpret islam to justify suicide bombing of civilians. Iam pretty sure once the enthusiam of fighting terrorism wears off and people stop blindly accepting decisions because of 'terrorism threats' someone will come up with another excuse for such actions. Don't misinterpret what iam saying, i am not defeding nazism. You had the right to fight that system and your victory over it benefited the entire world. Iam just saying that they always come up with an excuse for their actions. Sometime its valid, like when they were fighting nazism. Sometimes they make it up to justify their doings, like the soviet union and US cold war. I prefer US's point of view on things, but that doesn't mean that i see communists as criminals and blood thirsty bastards. Both soviet union and US used their people's hatred for the other system to force their point of view on third world countries who might have prefered a different view. The ones who were trully hurt were 3rd world countries that ended up in the middle. QUOTE It does not speak well of your religion that you would rationalize this with such propaganda for it calls into question whether your religion is capable of intilling a proper distinction between good and evil in its believers. Iam not sure i understood that part. Note: I was told that earning mycents from this forum might be a glitch and when its fixed the mycents will be deducted, so don't count on any mycents you get from this discussion =)
Similar Topics
Keywords : questions, islam, things, understand, religion
different question regrding women in Islam and their answerzzzzz (2) Why shud a Muslim woman be subjugated to da compulsion of a dresscode? Isn’t this restraining her commentary on his views of science and religion (17) In several forums I have been informed that the ideas I were expressing were very similar to the Response to Perry Marshall's CoffeehouseTheology.com (4) I cannot remember how it came to my attention but I checked out Perry Marshall's site Is every world religion swimming in its own pools of contradictions? (21) Never Mind I understand now!.... Book about discovering God on your own. (5) With grave concern for a world being torn into bits by religious divisiveness, I’d like to tell (15) I wrote a piece on this topic, which I mentioned in a different thread. (5) plzz if you dont know about islam or christian then read about it and vote ... /dry.gif" (19) I am one of many who knows the absurdity in believing in invisible men in the sky, angels, (35) HI everyone! I'm new here, and I thought it might be interesting to make a poll about Religion and Philosophy (7) Hello, I tell them than me hey submitted to a regrecion to last lives and in reality Uruguay is Rules and Guidelines. (0) Members must follow the General Rules while posting. For the General rules, please Click the Looking for questions, islam, things, understand, religion
|
 Questions On Islam - Some things I don't understand about the religion |
Affordable Web Hosting, Low cost Web Hosting - ComputingHost.com
