| Nov 8, 2009 |
QUOTE (mikaelgn @ May 10 2005, 01:35 PM) only for consoles? but starcraft have never been made for console play, only the first edition of diablo was made for PS one right? why console, bah!  Thats actually incorrect. They made starcraft for Nintendo 64. The reason most people don't know about it is because the game is very rare. Some how my friend managed to get one. Thats how I know about it. I too can't wait for diablo III. I highly doubt that they would make it so that you have to pay monthly. If they did, they would have a lot less people buying it. This if my opinion, but if they make it... I think they will keep it on battle.net and not have their own servers like World of Warcraft. There has been talk about Starcraft II for along time. My friend in 8th grade knew a person that worked at blizzard and got a list of all the races and units for starcraft II. I do not know for sure if these were correct, but if it was.... Starcraft II is going to be the best computer game ever 
Not only am I looking forward to Diablo Three, but also Starcraft Two. These two titles are something to look forward from Blizzard, and for some, Warcraft is something expected.
I wonder how the games would look with updated graphics and gameplay. It would be awesome I bet.
If they make a Diablo 3 they would need to change alot for it to be the "best action RPG ever"... I mean I loved D and D2 but come on, be serious now, its a hack and slash blood fest at its core and thats what was fun. The storylines were pretty weak at best, and the gameplay was fairly repetative no matter how much they threw new enemies and magic into the mix. Like I said, I loved the ames, hope they make a D3... its just not going to be some God-send unless they pimp the game out a fair bit
QUOTE(Jeigh @ Jul 4 2005, 06:43 PM) If they make a Diablo 3 they would need to change alot for it to be the "best action RPG ever"... I mean I loved D and D2 but come on, be serious now, its a hack and slash blood fest at its core and thats what was fun. The storylines were pretty weak at best, and the gameplay was fairly repetative no matter how much they threw new enemies and magic into the mix. Like I said, I loved the ames, hope they make a D3... its just not going to be some God-send unless they pimp the game out a fair bit Jeigh, in my opinion, I liked the story lines of D and D2 quite a lot. Apart from the gameplay, storyline is one thing that makes Diablo II and the expansion so playable. I am not sure about the story line of Starcraft though. It is quite hard to keep track of multiple perspectives that go on in the Starcraft timeline.
Actually StarCraft doesn't follow a timeline or story mode, you just go killing after killing in my opinion. The best story line from Blizzard Entertainment, is probably War Craft III. It follows a smooth and self-explanatory story mode. I hope WC4 comes out
 . Now about Diablo Set; I remember spending endless hours on Bnet playing this game going into the cow levels. Hoping that Bnet won't start charging inorder to go online, if they do then if online is good then might as well pay to play. Is there a time set on when D3 is comming out?
I stil play Diablo II sometimes! I would definatly get the third one! Does anyone know when it is coming out?
I was a bit apprehensive about this, cuz this topic began in 2005, and Since WoW has been out, all talk of Diablo has been relegated to its hardest-core fans, such as myself. The storyline, in my opinion, has been truly engaging, and the death levels of Diablo 2 made "fighting though hell" literal. The pointless hack-n-slash is a sore point many have raised over the years since the first Diablo was released. The atmosphere of the game, and the in-game music, dialogue and scenarios have often surpassed other contemporaries, and Diablo has never made a huge fuss about system requirements. This post borders on becoming a higly one-sided review, but for anyone who has played, and loves Diablo...its but natural to get defensive.
the point here, is Diablo 3- why and how will it work? 1. Most of Diablo's followers, having waited long enough and having upgraded their PCs in the meantime, have switched lanes to join WarCraft's hordes. in other words, blizzard can very well sit back and relax, since the target audience has been retained for most part. Diablo - 0, Others - 1 2. This is personal experience, I already have a weird feeling this is individual  - Diablo games never bog your PC down too much- a general trend with Blizzard games that achieve graphical detail and sustain gameplay value without getting ur RAM all held up. Considering the expectation levels for Diablo 3's graphics, and the gaming crowd - by now, seasoned to WarCraft's multi-genre feel and resource-intensive, uncompromising graphics, and of many more MMORPGs available, the hypothetical 3rd game in the Diablo franchise will be up against some pretty mean competition, and I doubt if loyalists would like Diablo to be a re-painted clone of anything else - I wouldn't. Diablo - 0, Others - 2Diablo 3 will have to be a richly detailed world, a better storyline to resurrect Mr. Spanish Devil, new repertoire of playable characters, possibly more NPC interaction, and yet retain the good old hack-n-slash with those fire-ice-lightning-poison elements. Tall order. 3. Lets hope Blizzard is motivated enough. Diablo - forever, Others - whatever 
starcraft 2
Diablo 3 Replying to Caderaystar craft 2 is coming out after the release of diablo 3. Got to http://www.Blizzard.Com and click on starcraft 2 to see more -reply by DIABLO
A diablo 3 would be sweet...I play Diablo II everynow and then....was big into a while back...but after beating it i moved on...i recently found a "lord of destruction" expansion cd, but i havent got around to installing it...i plan to soon though..i have never played this expansion..so i look forward to seeing the updates
 later guys |
 Diablo 3 |
Affordable Web Hosting, Low cost Web Hosting - ComputingHost.com
