Replying to Nuclear Fusion

really interesting idea. really.
before this, i've have stumble upon the same kind of thinking. i've been studying about it and actually tried it. but then, i know i was wrong. it would never work.
remember the idea about "energy cannot be created, only can be converted into another form"?. it true.

the system you have design might have the ability to retain energy (electricity) for some period of time, but then, the energy will slowly dissipiate. why? consider this;
1. the copper wire you are using will impose some resistance, where the electricity will be converted to heat and slowly dissipiate into the sorrounding invironment.
2. the mechanical movement will impose some physical resistance to the wheel and wind. so, again, the energy inside the system will be converted to other energy and dissipiate into the invironment.

this system, at the best will only be able to retain energy

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

really interesting idea. really.
before this, i've have stumble upon the same kind of thinking. i've been studying about it and actually tried it. but then, i know i was wrong. it would never work.
remember the idea about "energy cannot be created, only can be converted into another form"?. it true.

the system you have design might have the ability to retain energy (electricity) for some period of time, but then, the energy will slowly dissipiate. why? consider this;
1. the copper wire you are using will impose some resistance, where the electricity will be converted to heat and slowly dissipiate into the sorrounding invironment.
2. the mechanical movement will impose some physical resistance to the wheel and wind. so, again, the energy inside the system will be converted to other energy and dissipiate into the invironment.

this system, at the best will only be able to retain energy

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Here is the entire article I wrote about the magnetism idea I mentioned previously. The picture is a bit crude but It does the job.



PART A: Here you can see how this machine essentially works. The Inner part is a wheel, attached to an axil. On this wheel, is at least one permanent bar-magnet. On the outer part, is a ring of opposing electro-magnets. These are activated in sequence, controlled by a computer system. This is similar technology to Christmas ''chaser'' lights: Only one magnet is on at any time, the moment the next in sequence is activated, the one before has been de-activated. By activating the electro-magnets in sequence, the permanent bar-magnet on the inner wheel is pushed in a clockwise direction. The magnets could be switched on/off faster and faster, but only consume a set amount of electricity. In this example, each electro-magnet consumes electricity at a constant rate of ''10''. There could be any set number of electro-magnets active at any time in the sequence depending on how many permanent bar-magnets are on the inner wheel, but for this example only one is used. More torque could be generated by having more permanent bar-magnets. Both the wheel and outer part would be made of a substance that is un-affected by magnets such as ceramic or plastic, and the inner wheel would be quite heavy, to increase momentum ounce moving.

PART B: This is the computer system that controls the electro-magnet activation sequence. It would have some kind of controls that allow the rate to be increased, therefore generating more power.

PART C: Attached to the inner wheel by an axil, this is the generator. On a small scale, It could be similar to a car alternator.

PART D: This is some kind of device that manages the electricity from the generator. In this example, "10" electricity is fed to PART B, and any additional electricity could be fed into batteries, a power grid etc.

PART E: This is a battery of some kind. It is necessary to start the machine working, after that it would be self-sustaining, and the battery could be recharged, like in a car.

It is quite obvious that this machine would be HUGELY important if it worked. Large scale versions could be set up in power stations, which could replace coal, nuclear, oil and other pollution generating means of power generation. Small scale versions could be set up to power private homes or small country towns. It may have further applications such as vehicles. One of the laws of physics states that you cant get more energy out than what you put in. This machine works on magnetism which is not well understood, and I cant see any reason why it would not work.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>