Welcome to AstaHost - Dear Guest , Please Register here to get Your own website. - Ask a Question / Express Opinion / Reply w/o Sign-Up!
Replying to AMD And INTEL major diffrence
Posted 26 November 2004 - 12:09 AM
Anyway, after all that, the question of which is better depends on what you are doing. For gaming, AMD is the way to go. For multitasking and similar, go Intel.
Posted 25 November 2004 - 07:36 PM
Posted 24 November 2004 - 09:58 PM
Posted 24 November 2004 - 05:53 PM
cause if you dont want 'em, dont buy em, and i want the best, barely any matter what it costs
Posted 24 November 2004 - 05:48 PM
even though Linux suports 64 bit processors its kinda useless cause u cant play alot of games on it. and if u wanna overclock p4 nowadays you just hafta go to ur bios and change the speed to w/e speed u like(if u got the new bios).
Posted 24 November 2004 - 06:35 AM
1. linux does support 64bit processors, so they aren't useless.
2. i have an am 2500+ and hl2 runs very smoothly with good graphs. it's all in your videocard kiddo. half life doesn't require all that much power. besides, in this other topic you said half life does only require half as much power as doom3. i'm wondering what you need to play d3 in your opinion...
3. overclockers have always preferred amd because it's easier to overclock.
amd rocks but you just don't want to understand that.
Posted 24 November 2004 - 12:50 AM
Posted 21 November 2004 - 05:44 PM
Posted 21 November 2004 - 05:17 PM
AMD will continue to give you more for your money. Things will pretty much, stay
AMDs aren't that expensive yet, but they will go up more as they are more common, and evntually Intels will be obsolete in any and all gaming computers. I had a barebone system made with a 64-bit AMD 2.7(I believe) and it wasnt that expensive for it. As for pushing to the limit, what do you want? I mean...a pc can be pushed to the limit as with overclocking as long as you know what you are doing, but there isnt much of a point after AMD's 2.5+ and Intels 3.0+ honestly. I mean, ya you get to multi-task a little more, but why do you need to multi-task that much, especially if it is for gaming.
the way they are because Intel has so many big manufacturers in their pocket!
Dell for instance, builds only with Pentium and they are pretty big.
As for my expression "pushed to the limit" that's in a factorymade system where
the manufacturer has to think about costs,heat and noise! We will soon have
a totally new architecture on CPU's because the only way to go now, is to make
I think the latest change was the last one, just because it's getting impossible
to shrink it more!
Posted 21 November 2004 - 04:54 PM