|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Nov 20 2005, 10:18 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Bursting with vegany goodness! Group: Members Posts: 342 Joined: 8-April 05 From: Norwich, UK Member No.: 3,753 |
I just felt like mentioning ImageShack, seeing as they're so good!
http://www.imageshack.us For those of you who haven't seen a service like this before, ImageShack let you upload pictures from your computer and host them for you, for an unlimited amount of time, for any reason (except for pornography). Even though Astahost provide excellent hosting, it can be a bit tiresome, logging in to cPanel and finding (or creating) a folder to host a couple of images. This is why Image Shack is so useful - it's quick and effecient. Although thier homepage is a bit cluttered with all the adverts, they provide an excellent service, for free. After uploading your images, there are several options for linking to, or displaying, images. There is everything, from pre-prepared BBcode thumbnails for forums, to a gallery, so you can show people serveral images at a time. If your image isn't accessed for a year, it is automatically deleted. However, if someone accesses it (even on day 364) the counter is reset, and your image will spend another year on thier server. For something that's completely free, I think the guys at Imageshack do an excellent job! |
|
|
|
Nov 20 2005, 01:01 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Nenad Bozidarevic Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 1,013 Joined: 7-November 05 From: Belgrade, Serbia Member No.: 9,500 |
It is good, but I prefer photobucket. When I first needed something like that I look at both of them, and I found photobucket a bit more easier. As for imageshack.us, I have just tried to open it and it displayed an Internal Server Error
Shame on them... |
|
|
|
Nov 20 2005, 04:05 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Member - Active Contributor Group: Members Posts: 80 Joined: 5-September 05 Member No.: 8,327 |
yeah i know about them, and there is some server that pays you to host images, something like imagecash.com !
what hit my mind is: 1.why will someone set a server just to host your images? -do you think this is some tricks to use your pictures for futur, for any reasons, like if you uploading your own photo there, they could use your photo and identify themselves as you in some places, or something like that? 2.and why will someone pay you to host images. i guess the ads generating money for them or something? Yudz |
|
|
|
Nov 20 2005, 05:41 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Member [ Level 2 ] Group: Members Posts: 74 Joined: 8-October 05 From: Romania Member No.: 8,983 |
well... i use imagesgack too because they are simply great ! you can upload unlimited number of photos and you get links for all sorts of thumbnails and such... and it's free !
i have to admit that the page is cluttered with ads and it makes the navigation a little difficult ! and... i don't think they use your photos... they have to know the name and such to identify theirselves with your name... but... it is an ideea |
|
|
|
Nov 20 2005, 08:05 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 2 ] Group: Members Posts: 13 Joined: 9-October 05 Member No.: 8,994 |
I like ImageShack. In my opinion they dont have many ads. It costs a ton to do what they do. They need the money from the ads to keep on running it but I dont know. Some things about it are just annoying. I dont like big projects unless I'm at the head of them
I've been using IMGshare.us lately. Loads quicker. Less ad's. Designed by someone I know and still small enough to be good in my book. The only give the URL of the image but for me that's fine. |
|
|
|
Nov 21 2005, 04:47 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Premium Member Group: Members Posts: 206 Joined: 4-September 05 Member No.: 8,310 |
yes imageshack is easier then most of the image hosts out thier and well thier quick load plugin makes it even easier (hosting images by right clicking on them) its amazing there is such a good service for imagehosting, soon enough ill be launching my image hosting service and ill definetly surpas them
|
|
|
|
Dec 17 2005, 01:15 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Member [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 33 Joined: 26-November 05 From: California, USA Member No.: 9,824 |
I've used ImageShack a while ago for my image hosting needs. But now I don't use it anymore. I mean, yes it is very reliable. Probably one of the best image hosts I've ever come across. But I've come to not trust any image host anymore. You see, no one hosts your images out of the goodness of their heart. They want something out of it. And by far, I've probably hosted a few hundred images on it. I wonder how many everyone else has. The advertisements on ImageShack don't seem enough to suffice all of that. So there's no telling when they're going to just pack up and leave. I wouldn't put it past them if they did now. They're probably going to, once they start losing profits.
My advice to you is this: look before crossing. For example, ImageCash. Or free iPods. They're all the same to me. |
|
|
|
Dec 17 2005, 10:10 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 17-December 05 Member No.: 10,162 |
QUOTE(pyost @ Nov 20 2005, 01:01 PM) It is good, but I prefer photobucket. When I first needed something like that I look at both of them, and I found photobucket a bit more easier. As for imageshack.us, I have just tried to open it and it displayed an Internal Server Error Shame on them... I agree totally, photobucket is far better because as it allows sign ups it will save the images you've uploaded before. |
|
|
|
Dec 18 2005, 08:18 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 7 Joined: 18-December 05 Member No.: 10,179 |
Imageshack.us IS great. If I don't feel like logging into photobucket or other server, I can simply upload an image on imageshack without an account. It's very convenient in my opinion. Thumbs up.
|
|
|
|
Dec 19 2005, 06:37 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Premium Member Group: Members Posts: 243 Joined: 20-January 05 From: Bombay, INDIA Member No.: 2,231 |
QUOTE(R1chard.f5 @ Dec 17 2005, 04:40 PM) I agree totally, photobucket is far better because as it allows sign ups it will save the images you've uploaded before. Actually, imageshack.us also allows you to save photos if you've registered. The major downside to this is the login procedure. To login and view the images you've uploaded previously, you need to click the registration link that came in the email they sent you when you first registered. No username. No password. Which means you need access to the URL or your mailbox in order to login. A little annoying, but if like me you use it mostly to post funny images or screenshots, you can use a URL redirection service like tinyurl.com or snurl.com to point to the registration URL. I caution you that is an insecure way, beause all a person needs to do is to enter the corret URL (which can be guessed or come across accidentally) and he can access your account. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 13th October 2008 - 03:13 AM |