|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Aug 26 2005, 06:33 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Colonel Panic Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 2,718 Joined: 25-March 05 From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Member No.: 3,233 |
Well, my dad's office needs to upgrade it's primary server that's currently running Redhat 7.2, and I need recommend him a distro, but I'm stumped between Fedora and SUSE, wut do u guys think? If you want to recommend other distros, please tell me, and state the reason.
Thanks! xboxrulz This post has been edited by microscopic^earthling: Aug 26 2005, 06:01 PM |
|
|
|
Aug 26 2005, 07:09 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
[+] Graphic Designer [+] Group: Members Posts: 614 Joined: 6-April 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 3,666 |
I would stay with fedora, primary it's a legacy of redhat, and people would be already familiar with it, because it's basicly the same system they had before...
|
|
|
|
Aug 26 2005, 10:07 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Way Out Of Control - You need a life :) Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 1,979 Joined: 16-August 05 Member No.: 7,896 |
+1 for Fedora. I suppose your father's office people are not experienced administrators, else you would not ask this kind of question.
So, they are satisfied with Redhat, I would also suggest stay with redhat. If you change to another distro, you will see people ignoring the advantages in the other distro, and keep crying for features they liked in RedHat. You may like a distro or not, but once people learned RedHat, don't force them to learn a new one. |
|
|
|
Aug 28 2005, 09:47 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Premium Member Group: Members Posts: 254 Joined: 28-December 04 Member No.: 1,884 |
Well, I must ask, what all is this server being used for?
|
|
|
|
Aug 29 2005, 12:54 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Member [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 30 Joined: 25-August 05 Member No.: 8,094 |
I would recommend fedora. I tried to install fedora core 1 and it screwed the MBR but the bug was resolved in the latest versions. Fedora is the continuation of redhat. And it's geared to desktop users, so I think it's better to have Redhat enterprise edition for a server. But fedora will do.
|
|
|
|
Aug 29 2005, 08:54 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Colonel Panic Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 2,718 Joined: 25-March 05 From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Member No.: 3,233 |
Well, it is a: file, print, web server, email and other use server. Also, he has a Windoze server running a database software.
xboxrulz |
|
|
|
Aug 30 2005, 06:34 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Premium Member Group: Members Posts: 254 Joined: 28-December 04 Member No.: 1,884 |
Well, I haven't had experience with Fedora, but I have with older Red Hat, and I myself wouldn't use Red Hat, or Fedora. My recommendation would be Debian.
|
|
|
|
Aug 30 2005, 08:59 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Colonel Panic Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 2,718 Joined: 25-March 05 From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Member No.: 3,233 |
too many CDs needed!
xboxrulz |
|
|
|
Aug 30 2005, 07:05 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Premium Member Group: Members Posts: 254 Joined: 28-December 04 Member No.: 1,884 |
Um...I only used one CD, and the image was only 110-180M or so...
This is what we call a network install... |
|
|
|
Aug 30 2005, 07:56 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Premium Member Group: Members Posts: 493 Joined: 15-August 05 Member No.: 7,873 |
Any reason why your switching distros? Any reason why Redhat 7 is no longer effective? I could understand a move to new hardware and lack of drivers for older distros.
If you are going to move, have you even considered switching to FreeBSD or OpenBSD? Actually I wouldn't recommend OpenBSD unless your a security freak. But FreeBSD is worth a look and it has some really nice features. One being that once it is installed and has a connection to the internet, every part of the system can be updated as new versions come out automatically without having to purchase the next CD set (which you can DL an ISO if you really want or my favorite method, ever major release (ie 3, 4, 5, soon to be 6) get the Sams FreeBSD unleashed book that has a copy of the core OS on CD rom. Then just download the latest ports collection and run cvsup and get the latest kernal release. Chances are, all the software he is using for print, file, and web sharing will run the exact same way under FreeBSD since chances are they are the same programs. If not, FreeBSD has a Linux emulation layer and I've never had any problems running Linux applications in FreeBSD. Frankly I find FreeBSD boxes to much easier to adminster and keep up to date since FreeBSD will do most of the work for you. Being able to go into ports/postgresql7/ then type make && make install and come back a few minutes later and have PostgreSQL installed and ready to go is really, really handy. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 29th August 2008 - 04:35 AM |