|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Jan 11 2007, 07:38 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Super Member Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 709 Joined: 8-April 06 From: Lima - Peru Member No.: 12,579 |
Hi, i want to share with everybody this excellent article at sitepoint.com that i just read, it highlights and answers most FAQ about HTML, it's very consice and simply and for me it is a must to read.
You can read it at Bulletproof HTML: 37 Steps to Perfect Markup. Best regards, |
|
|
|
Jan 11 2007, 09:07 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Member [ Level 2 ] Group: Members Posts: 64 Joined: 21-December 06 Member No.: 18,611 |
really nice article .. thanks for bringing some good stuffs.
|
|
|
|
Jan 12 2007, 12:28 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Member [ Level 2 ] Group: Members Posts: 58 Joined: 9-January 07 Member No.: 19,280 |
This is quite interesting stuff, and clarifies some questions anyone can have. One thing though, most popular sites on the net fail to pass W3C tests. That's something to think about.
|
|
|
|
Jan 12 2007, 06:20 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 145 Joined: 6-October 05 Member No.: 8,941 |
^^
I think that is because they are using Content Management Systems which are horribly complex.What I am trying to say is that upgrading it is a very very tedious process. |
|
|
|
Jan 12 2007, 07:08 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
the Q Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 980 Joined: 13-July 05 From: Lithuania, Vilnius Member No.: 7,059 |
Well, by reading the article I didn't find anything new, its really a great resource for newbies and I like that more and more "better" articles are appearing and I agree with most what is written there, I especially liked the 9 question answer which says why should we validate our markup? Because I never could find the suitable words how to tell it in my most posts where people talk about markup validation.. I never liked when people say "google doesn't pass validation, so why should we" Hmm, I don't think that Google is something from whom to take an example, well even though if you check the validator errors it parses on google main page, when maybe you'll understand that their main errors are & and not & and they don't use quotes, they have everything almost in several lines.. this is just to save bandwidth, their simple page is viewable by cross browsers, so I think this is what counts for them.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 4th July 2008 - 03:07 AM |