|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Nov 11 2005, 05:48 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 30 Joined: 10-November 05 From: Malaysia Member No.: 9,535 |
I found out that Creative Music Player are becoming better and better each day.
Has Apple solve their easy to scratch Nano? Who is winning the battle? How? Why? PS: Samsung is also rising to become a top gun in the Music Player industry This post has been edited by microscopic^earthling: Nov 12 2005, 02:19 AM |
|
|
|
Nov 13 2005, 04:26 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Premium Member Group: Members Posts: 257 Joined: 28-January 05 Member No.: 2,370 |
If you want style, I say the iPod is best. It's obvious they look the coolest. But they're so easy to scratch...my gosh.
If you want the most for your money, I'd say go with a Creative. The Zen Micro is the same price as a 2 gig iPod Nano, but has a 6 gigabyte drive. Although, the Creative players are now have the Windows Audio PlaysForSure thingamabob/whatchamacallit, so I dunno if it'd work with Linux.....but Ipods should. |
|
|
|
Nov 13 2005, 12:34 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Nenad Bozidarevic Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 998 Joined: 7-November 05 From: Belgrade, Serbia Member No.: 9,500 |
I prefer Cretive, since i've got one myself. Sure, iPod looks better, but ask yourself - would you drive a nice car that has a max speed od 50 kmph, or a Yugo (google it if you don't know what it is) that goes 200 kmph? When you answer that, you'll know what to do. But it should be Creative in my opinion.
P.S. Yugo has absolutly no chance of achieving 200 kmph |
|
|
|
Nov 14 2005, 12:11 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Wheeeeeeee! Group: Members Posts: 245 Joined: 19-October 05 From: DG, Belgium Member No.: 9,200 |
Creative Drivers don't support Macs (as far as I could find out, trying to connect an Creative Zen). I'm not sure about Linux, at least not natively.
iPods do.. and honestly fellows, most people want the headphones, not the iPod, because they show the style/riches/attitude. It is like the golden chains for the ghetto or the car for the average 45 yr. old Kraut. First impression. status symbol. |
|
|
|
Jan 24 2006, 11:51 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
That really was a Hattori Honzo sword. Group: Members Posts: 473 Joined: 27-August 05 From: Texas, USA Member No.: 8,126 |
QUOTE(altsr @ Nov 11 2005, 12:48 PM) I found out that Creative Music Player are becoming better and better each day. Has Apple solve their easy to scratch Nano? Who is winning the battle? How? Why? PS: Samsung is also rising to become a top gun in the Music Player industry I just bought my first portable MP3 player a few days ago. I only had $100 to spend, so there was no way that I would get some brand-new, eight-thousand-gigabyte player. But, the advantage for me is that I only need a few CDs' worth of music on the thing at any given time. I just use it when I'm going to or from classes, and maybe sometimes when I'm at home with my family - but in the latter instance, I have my laptop right there so I can of course transfer new files in whenever I feel like changing things up. Anyway ... I ended up with an iriver, which I really like so far. It holds 256MB of music, runs on a plain old AA battery (very easy to change out - and cheap to replace), and came with all the accessores I wanted (and some that I didn't, like the armband). And, if I get bored with the music that I've loaded, I can switch to the radio option. Apple's only comparably-priced product is the Shuffle, which I don't like. For 100 dollars you get 512MB of space, yes, and you have the convenience of being able to use iTunes. But you don't get a display screen. My iRiver, on the other hand, has that display - which is pretty much vital to me. So, I'll take half the space to get the digital screen any day. I think that a lot of Apple's sales are just for the trendiness factor anyway. A lot of people call portable MP3 players "iPods" even when the device in question isn't made by Apple. It's sort of like how we call all tissues "Kleenex" even though we're blowing our noses into some generic brand. *shrugs* We'll see if Apple can stay on top. |
|
|
|
Apr 30 2006, 03:47 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Member [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 43 Joined: 27-April 05 Member No.: 4,459 |
I just bought my first portable MP3 player a few days ago. I only had $100 to spend, so there was no way that I would get some brand-new, eight-thousand-gigabyte player. But, the advantage for me is that I only need a few CDs' worth of music on the thing at any given time. I just use it when I'm going to or from classes, and maybe sometimes when I'm at home with my family - but in the latter instance, I have my laptop right there so I can of course transfer new files in whenever I feel like changing things up. Anyway ... I ended up with an iriver, which I really like so far. It holds 256MB of music, runs on a plain old AA battery (very easy to change out - and cheap to replace), and came with all the accessores I wanted (and some that I didn't, like the armband). And, if I get bored with the music that I've loaded, I can switch to the radio option. Apple's only comparably-priced product is the Shuffle, which I don't like. For 100 dollars you get 512MB of space, yes, and you have the convenience of being able to use iTunes. But you don't get a display screen. My iRiver, on the other hand, has that display - which is pretty much vital to me. So, I'll take half the space to get the digital screen any day. I think that a lot of Apple's sales are just for the trendiness factor anyway. A lot of people call portable MP3 players "iPods" even when the device in question isn't made by Apple. It's sort of like how we call all tissues "Kleenex" even though we're blowing our noses into some generic brand. *shrugs* We'll see if Apple can stay on top. Hmm quite interesting. And about the thing about kleenex's and ipods... Its the same way with handheld games. Everyone calls them a gameboy unless they know better. *shrug* just an observation. |
|
|
|
May 1 2006, 04:36 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Member [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 35 Joined: 1-May 06 From: Boston, MA USA Member No.: 13,126 |
Now Please correct me if this is false, but arent you forced to use apple's software to load mp3's onto your Ipod? I was under the assumption that this was the case, hense me buying a 30gb zen jukebox.
|
|
|
|
May 29 2006, 01:03 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 2 ] Group: Members Posts: 15 Joined: 29-May 06 Member No.: 13,705 |
Now Please correct me if this is false, but arent you forced to use apple's software to load mp3's onto your Ipod? I was under the assumption that this was the case, hense me buying a 30gb zen jukebox. Not technically, there are thirty party software out there to do such a thing. Personally though I like the itunes system as it works nicely, and is easy to organize. My complaint is with the ipod videos and the slow kickstart after being off for a bit...or maybe I'm just that lucky to get a defunct ipod as well. |
|
|
|
Jun 4 2006, 05:36 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Premium Idiot Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 661 Joined: 9-July 05 From: Switzerland, but currently in Pakistan Member No.: 6,943 |
Now Please correct me if this is false, but arent you forced to use apple's software to load mp3's onto your Ipod? I was under the assumption that this was the case, hense me buying a 30gb zen jukebox. Well there's always ways around the default, but it's not the easiest, and you sometimes end up giving up and going back to itunes. which i don't like because it takes over the audio control of the playback on the computer, plus loads itself at startup and has its little running processes all the time. gunks up the computer some more, especially on a windows platform. As Sarah81 said, the iRiver is a great mp3 player, and if i were out shopping for a new one, that's what i would go for, after living with an iPod fanatic, and owning a Creative Zen. |
|
|
|
Jun 8 2006, 03:39 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Teh Coder Group: Members Posts: 1,053 Joined: 18-April 06 From: Australia Member No.: 12,833 |
As far as i'm concerned they are all overpriced. I think Creative is more expensive generally than the Apple Ipod's aren't they?
That might be their new portable video viewing devices I'm thinking of though. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 29th August 2008 - 05:28 AM |