|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Mar 10 2005, 04:54 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 142 Joined: 24-November 04 From: Netherlands Member No.: 1,504 |
hey,
i got avast! since a few days, it's a free anti-virussoftware. it protects against computer viruses, worms and trojan horses. it's free, as long as it's for personal use. if you want it for your company, you gotta pay. it's up-to-date, because it's updated regularly. the newest version is 4.6 you can download it & find more information here: http://www.avast.com/ |
|
|
|
Mar 11 2005, 01:26 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 2 ] Group: Members Posts: 15 Joined: 11-March 05 From: Skien, Norway Member No.: 2,999 |
Yeah, avast! is the best program. I have used it since version 4.3 or 4.4, and it protect from almost all viruses. But you should also use a anti ad-ware program too, like Ad-Aware.
|
|
|
|
Mar 11 2005, 03:45 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 142 Joined: 24-November 04 From: Netherlands Member No.: 1,504 |
yep, you need that too. i use spybot - search & destroy, and am quite happy with it. you can download it here: http://www.download.com/Spybot-Search-Dest...tml?tag=lst-0-2 at download.com
|
|
|
|
Mar 11 2005, 03:46 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 118 Joined: 25-February 05 From: Tampines, Singapore Member No.: 2,783 |
From my personal opinion, you are better off using AntiVir Personal Edition as it has the highest detection rate and uses the least resources among all the freeware antivirus like avast! Home Edition and AVG Antivirus Free Edition. The interface has the Windows Classic look but it does pack the standard solid features of an antivirus. Consider getting another antivirus for on-demand scans too.I think my cousin mentioned this before since we share the same ideas.
avast! uses as much resources as Symantec products.It does look professional but it depends on how much memory are you willing to spare. |
|
|
|
Mar 11 2005, 05:17 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 2 ] Group: Members Posts: 15 Joined: 11-March 05 From: Skien, Norway Member No.: 2,999 |
I don't like Searc & destroy... I had it before.
It was quite harder to manage than AD-Aware. (That is one of the reasons why i recommend it) And i have used alot of other programs too - like AVG, Norton, and Norman, but Avast! is the best one. |
|
|
|
Mar 14 2005, 01:21 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Member - Active Contributor Group: Members Posts: 81 Joined: 15-September 04 Member No.: 598 |
Its natural for avast to require much resources because it has more featues and a mind blowing gui. it offers six protections (standard, internet mail, instant messaging, outlookand express, p2p file sharing, web shield). updated automatically/frequently, plus a "virus recovery database". To reduce avast's resource consumption, simply disable those protections you dont need.
comparing the performances/rate of detection of mentioned free antivirus softwares here...based on the "lab virus" of Virus Bulletin..Avast! has a good detection rate 11/19..... + avast! - http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/archives/pro...s.xml?avist.xml + AVG - http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/archives/products.xml?avg.xml + AntiVir - http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/archives/pro...xml?antivir.xml Antivir is good, but stubbornly updated. It will took them some time to update the virus database of the software, when a new strand of virus appears. (unreliable when you need it the most) AVG on the other hand is good and require lesser resources compared to avast, but crippled with some features. If you want an antivirus which doesnt consume lots of memory Clamwin is a better option.. http://www.clamwin.com/ Clamwin doesnt offer on access scanning so it doesnt run on the back ground. To be able to detect virus, you have to manually run the scan option. |
|
|
|
Apr 17 2005, 04:38 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 17-April 05 Member No.: 4,084 |
I agree that Avast! is a good AV, and whenever possible it's great to use something that's free.
Although, when it comes to computer security and depending on your surfing/downloading habits (or of others who use your machine), I actually came to the conclusion that paying for an AV is worth it - esp because of the issue of frequency of updates The leanest in terms of resources/scan speed & probably one of (if not) the best is Nod32 http://www.nod32.com/home/home.htm For something more resource heavy, also check out Kaspersky (which is very good for detecting trojans too) http://www.kaspersky.com/ hth snowcrash |
|
|
|
Apr 23 2005, 01:52 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 165 Joined: 22-September 04 From: IS - IT - US - BE Member No.: 804 |
Nod32 is absolutly the best and only in my opinion
http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/archives/products.xml?eset.xml I've tried Avast and AvG but both weren't so good as NOd32 for example AVg don't know at all the RXBot,Urxbot or ForBot... Avast i remember can clean up only ForBot and these kind of bot/trojan are more diffucult to stop when you are infected cause it almost impossible to find the owner... The best way it's LINUX, for server, for desktop on LAptop...i've heard that someone is developing a new generation of trojan which can also infect LinuxBox but it's still a joke i hope |
|
|
|
Apr 23 2005, 07:05 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Bursting with vegany goodness! Group: Members Posts: 342 Joined: 8-April 05 From: Norwich, UK Member No.: 3,753 |
I've heard some pretty good things about Avast!, but at the moment, my Norton AV subscription doesn't expire for ages, so I'm gonna be stuck with it for a while.
On the adware/spyware side of things, I use Microsoft AntiSpyware Beta 1 (god knows why microsoft gave it such a long name), which is working pretty well. Norton's meant to pick up threats like spyware and adware, but its rubbish at it... |
|
|
|
Apr 24 2005, 01:21 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 11-April 05 Member No.: 3,843 |
I also use Avast! My friend that used it recommended it to me, and it's done great! No serious problems have occured since I've had it and it's great because it can automatically update itself. It's user-interface is VERY SIMPLE to use. I recommend it for anyone looking for a free anti-virus.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 30th August 2008 - 04:35 PM |