|
|
|
| Web Hosting |
![]() ![]() |
Professional Logos, Are they any good? |
Aug 29 2006, 12:49 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 39 Joined: 21-July 06 Member No.: 14,645 |
Hey i have been making logos for awhile now, but still new. My logos have always been way detailed and sometimes cartoonish. I wanted to try my luck at professional looking logos for my website http://ojproductions.net
I know the logos do not match the current style of my site, but i am changing the entire look of the site. I just wanted to know what you guys think of these logos for O&J Productions. Logo 1 ![]() Logo 2 ![]() So what do you think? |
|
|
|
Aug 29 2006, 01:37 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Teh Coder Group: Members Posts: 1,053 Joined: 18-April 06 From: Australia Member No.: 12,833 myCENTs:89.25 |
That's not bad. I really like the look of the second one but it seems far too *high* for me.
|
|
|
|
Aug 29 2006, 05:37 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Nenad Bozidarevic Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 1,053 Joined: 7-November 05 From: Belgrade, Serbia Member No.: 9,500 myCENTs:36.94 |
The second one is far better than the first one. It has a futuristic, 3D look and would nicely blend with a silver/blue/green theme (or so I think). The first one is a bit too shabby, and wouldn't be a good choice for sites nowadays.
|
|
|
|
Aug 30 2006, 05:47 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Member [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 39 Joined: 21-July 06 Member No.: 14,645 |
Yah i was thinking that the first needs some slight shadow and gradient like the 2nd one
|
|
|
|
Sep 1 2006, 06:36 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Member [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 42 Joined: 1-September 06 Member No.: 15,660 |
Yes the second looks by far more professional
Tone down the blue in the first pic, nowadays people prefer "soft colors", so use a light blue instead. Also what looks good nowadays is a "glossy" look. e: I just watched your site and I like it, like the glossy look This post has been edited by tommydanger: Sep 1 2006, 06:37 PM |
|
|
|
Sep 4 2006, 07:27 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Member [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 39 Joined: 21-July 06 Member No.: 14,645 |
Yes, glossy is awesome looking i would have to say. I love the glossy look and actually my ojproductions.net site is based on a simple glossy black feel. My new site however will be more "professional" but i have been very busy and yet to keep working on it along with my site hosted here on astahost.com
|
|
|
|
Oct 12 2006, 12:06 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 4 Joined: 11-October 06 Member No.: 16,498 |
I like the first more, but they are both good.
|
|
|
|
Oct 12 2006, 02:30 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 114 Joined: 1-July 06 Member No.: 14,234 |
I agree that the second one is far more professional, well done!
|
|
|
|
Oct 12 2006, 06:15 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
the Q Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 1,207 Joined: 13-July 05 From: Lithuania, Vilnius Member No.: 7,059 myCENTs:90.94 |
In fact I think they both are quite good, but both have downsides and if to make one out of those two, it would be really good. The first one has a very bad font, it needs more effects like the second one, and the graphic of the first one is better than in the second one.. etc.
|
|
|
|
Jan 14 2007, 06:31 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Newbie [ Level 1 ] Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 14-January 07 Member No.: 19,510 |
I like the visual direction of the second logo better, but the first logo has better design sensibility.
The first one has: emphasis on the correct part of the logo (the name vs. the symbol). readable name. The second one has: a better symbol; not Futura. As far as improving the second one, I'd say try playing around with the text's position so that it relates to the symbol better. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
72 | twitch | 7,437 | 29th October 2008 - 01:27 PM Last post by: Running With Scissors |
||
![]() |
21 | lacking_imagination | 4,349 | 30th July 2008 - 04:57 AM Last post by: Guest |
||
![]() |
3 | canalilha | 692 | 27th July 2008 - 06:49 AM Last post by: aqaing |
||
![]() |
8 | Senor_Grunt | 546 | 25th April 2008 - 06:33 AM Last post by: Senor_Grunt |
||
![]() |
4 | Free Website Designing | 730 | 18th September 2007 - 06:52 AM Last post by: Sten |
||
![]() |
7 | Chesso | 470 | 10th September 2007 - 06:41 AM Last post by: Chesso |
||
![]() |
5 | hazemmostafa | 931 | 15th August 2007 - 10:19 PM Last post by: develCuy |
||
![]() |
6 | mohsen2p | 692 | 21st October 2006 - 06:52 PM Last post by: Houdini |
||
![]() |
0 | soleimanian | 860 | 19th February 2006 - 09:46 AM Last post by: soleimanian |
||
![]() |
14 | saint-michael | 1,766 | 18th November 2005 - 03:20 AM Last post by: saint-michael |
||
![]() |
0 | haalaaluu | 717 | 14th October 2005 - 09:50 PM Last post by: haalaaluu |
||
![]() |
0 | NilsC | 1,101 | 20th June 2005 - 02:29 PM Last post by: |
Expand / Collapse Navigation



Aug 29 2006, 12:49 AM







