Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )




                Web Hosting

 
Reply to this topicNew Topic
Problems With Site To Site Transfer Using Fxp
curare
post Nov 18 2005, 01:48 AM
Post #1


Member [ Level 2 ]
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 60
Joined: 3-November 05
From: Austria/Thailand
Member No.: 9,419


Hi,

forgive me please if this has been posted before, I have searched the site for it, but as the search parameters in this case are three letter words, it did not yield any result. And yes, I also used searches with words in quotes, but those did not yield results either.

When I want to transfer files from my former website to my new one here, I can download them from there and upload them here. If I do not have a local copy that is. But just to make sure that all the revisions of PHP and HTML files are in place, I would prefer to use FXP. Which is something like "File eXchange Protocol", a subset of the FTP protocol if I am not mistaken. Basically, it transfers files directly from one site to another. All that you send and receive is the commands, but not the files themselves. Now when I do this using Flash FXP, which is a superb FTP client, I get an error message like
CODE

[02:36:31] [L] PASV
[02:36:31] [L] 227 Entering Passive Mode (213,202,241,26,160,174).
[02:36:32] [R] PORT 213,202,241,26,160,174
[02:36:32] [R] 500 Illegal PORT command
[02:36:32] Site to Site Transfer Failed! (Attempting alternative method)
[02:36:33] [R] PASV
[02:36:33] [R] 227 Entering Passive Mode (64,69,46,210,208,235).
[02:36:34] [L] PORT 64,69,46,210,208,235
[02:36:34] [L] 500 Illegal PORT command
[02:36:34] Site to Site Transfer Failed!
[02:36:34] [R] Transfer Failed!


Now, error code 500 stand for "Syntax error, command unrecognized. This may include errors such as command line too long." If I understand if right, and please correct me if I don't, the command PORT is not recognized by the server.

My question is: Is this done deliberately in the setup of the server or is my client the problem? I know from experience, that some site ops do not permit site to site transfers because of security reasons.

This is NOT acomplaint, please don't get it wrong. No problem for me to first d/l and then u/l. I am just asking out of the curosity of a FTP veteran.

This post has been edited by miCRoSCoPiC^eaRthLinG: Nov 18 2005, 05:34 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PureHeart
post Nov 18 2005, 01:59 AM
Post #2


Premium Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 209
Joined: 7-October 05
From: Đà Nẵng City - Việt Nam
Member No.: 8,966


QUOTE(curare @ Nov 18 2005, 08:48 AM)
My question is: Is this done deliberately in the setup of the server or is my client the problem? I know from experience, that some site ops do not permit site to site transfers because of security reasons.


It must be done by the server. The admin need to setup that before you can do a Site-to-site transfers. Most server doesn't support that because of security reasons (you knew it).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
miCRoSCoPiC^eaRt...
post Nov 18 2005, 05:34 AM
Post #3


PsYcheDeLiC dR3aMeR
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 2,242
Joined: 29-January 05
From: Nakorn Chaisri, Thailand
Member No.: 2,411
myCENTs:84.36


I don't think so - as far as I know, it can be done by a client too. Besdies you don't need any special setup to have this functioning except for:

QUOTE
Although FXPing is very easy, there are a few restrictions to transferring the files. Both hosts have to support PASV mode and must allow PORT commands to foreign hosts. The FXP client tells the destination FTP to listen for a connection by sending a "PASV" command. The source FTP then connects to the data port reported by the destination server (after a successful PASV command). Thus all the data goes directly from the source to the destination FTP and both servers only report status messages on fail/success to the FTP client.

Source: http://www.smartftp.com/support/kb/index.php/14


From what I know, it uses the basic FTP protocol to do the transfer - but with another layer of abstraction over it, not letting you see the actual files being transferred. That part of the process is fully automated. My point is, since it still uses FTP in the background, as long as both sites support PASV mode and PORT commands, it shouldn't be difficult at all.

As for Astahost, it supports both PASV and PORT - so no problems at this end.

Might be something to do with the other host you're trying to copy your files from. Find out if they support both these commands.

Regards,
m^e
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicNew Topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Collapse

> Similar Topics

    Topic Title Replies Topic Starter Views Last Action
No New Posts 6 miladinoski 169 30th December 2008 - 07:01 PM
Last post by: wutske
No New Posts   6 Mitch666Holland 731 29th December 2008 - 05:07 AM
Last post by: iG-sujan
No New Posts   0 zainboy 51 25th December 2008 - 08:48 PM
Last post by: zainboy
No New Posts 10 PUNKANGEL 8,580 24th December 2008 - 11:33 AM
Last post by: kpxchunsa
No new   22 Marcella 2,473 24th December 2008 - 03:54 AM
Last post by: chifro
No New Posts   9 WeaponX 1,724 20th December 2008 - 08:38 AM
Last post by: iG-kavyaguddu
No New Posts   11 sandeep 2,307 15th December 2008 - 07:04 AM
Last post by: iG-robert
No New Posts 11 lapis 1,343 14th December 2008 - 09:07 PM
Last post by: iG-smk34
No New Posts   4 laniczech 265 12th December 2008 - 02:06 AM
Last post by: quack
No New Posts   2 TavoxPeru 267 10th December 2008 - 12:21 AM
Last post by: Sellaman
No New Posts 16 JasPuneet 842 10th December 2008 - 12:09 AM
Last post by: Sellaman
No New Posts   8 iceblade 1,396 6th December 2008 - 12:59 PM
Last post by: iG-David
No New Posts 11 BHerath 1,354 6th December 2008 - 09:47 AM
Last post by: TehJohn
No New Posts 4 psionics 270 4th December 2008 - 11:36 PM
Last post by: Quatrux
No New Posts   8 nakulgupta 2,039 4th December 2008 - 05:26 AM
Last post by: iG-tohir