|
|
|
| Web Hosting |
![]() ![]() |
Problems With Site To Site Transfer Using Fxp |
Nov 18 2005, 01:48 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member [ Level 2 ] Group: Members Posts: 60 Joined: 3-November 05 From: Austria/Thailand Member No.: 9,419 |
Hi,
forgive me please if this has been posted before, I have searched the site for it, but as the search parameters in this case are three letter words, it did not yield any result. And yes, I also used searches with words in quotes, but those did not yield results either. When I want to transfer files from my former website to my new one here, I can download them from there and upload them here. If I do not have a local copy that is. But just to make sure that all the revisions of PHP and HTML files are in place, I would prefer to use FXP. Which is something like "File eXchange Protocol", a subset of the FTP protocol if I am not mistaken. Basically, it transfers files directly from one site to another. All that you send and receive is the commands, but not the files themselves. Now when I do this using Flash FXP, which is a superb FTP client, I get an error message like CODE [02:36:31] [L] PASV [02:36:31] [L] 227 Entering Passive Mode (213,202,241,26,160,174). [02:36:32] [R] PORT 213,202,241,26,160,174 [02:36:32] [R] 500 Illegal PORT command [02:36:32] Site to Site Transfer Failed! (Attempting alternative method) [02:36:33] [R] PASV [02:36:33] [R] 227 Entering Passive Mode (64,69,46,210,208,235). [02:36:34] [L] PORT 64,69,46,210,208,235 [02:36:34] [L] 500 Illegal PORT command [02:36:34] Site to Site Transfer Failed! [02:36:34] [R] Transfer Failed! Now, error code 500 stand for "Syntax error, command unrecognized. This may include errors such as command line too long." If I understand if right, and please correct me if I don't, the command PORT is not recognized by the server. My question is: Is this done deliberately in the setup of the server or is my client the problem? I know from experience, that some site ops do not permit site to site transfers because of security reasons. This is NOT acomplaint, please don't get it wrong. No problem for me to first d/l and then u/l. I am just asking out of the curosity of a FTP veteran. This post has been edited by miCRoSCoPiC^eaRthLinG: Nov 18 2005, 05:34 AM |
|
|
|
Nov 18 2005, 01:59 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Premium Member Group: Members Posts: 209 Joined: 7-October 05 From: Đà Nẵng City - Việt Nam Member No.: 8,966 |
QUOTE(curare @ Nov 18 2005, 08:48 AM) My question is: Is this done deliberately in the setup of the server or is my client the problem? I know from experience, that some site ops do not permit site to site transfers because of security reasons. It must be done by the server. The admin need to setup that before you can do a Site-to-site transfers. Most server doesn't support that because of security reasons (you knew it). |
|
|
|
Nov 18 2005, 05:34 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
PsYcheDeLiC dR3aMeR Group: Admin Posts: 2,242 Joined: 29-January 05 From: Nakorn Chaisri, Thailand Member No.: 2,411 myCENTs:84.36 |
I don't think so - as far as I know, it can be done by a client too. Besdies you don't need any special setup to have this functioning except for:
QUOTE Although FXPing is very easy, there are a few restrictions to transferring the files. Both hosts have to support PASV mode and must allow PORT commands to foreign hosts. The FXP client tells the destination FTP to listen for a connection by sending a "PASV" command. The source FTP then connects to the data port reported by the destination server (after a successful PASV command). Thus all the data goes directly from the source to the destination FTP and both servers only report status messages on fail/success to the FTP client. Source: http://www.smartftp.com/support/kb/index.php/14 From what I know, it uses the basic FTP protocol to do the transfer - but with another layer of abstraction over it, not letting you see the actual files being transferred. That part of the process is fully automated. My point is, since it still uses FTP in the background, as long as both sites support PASV mode and PORT commands, it shouldn't be difficult at all. As for Astahost, it supports both PASV and PORT - so no problems at this end. Might be something to do with the other host you're trying to copy your files from. Find out if they support both these commands. Regards, m^e |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
6 | miladinoski | 169 | 30th December 2008 - 07:01 PM Last post by: wutske |
|||
![]() |
6 | Mitch666Holland | 731 | 29th December 2008 - 05:07 AM Last post by: iG-sujan |
|||
![]() |
0 | zainboy | 51 | 25th December 2008 - 08:48 PM Last post by: zainboy |
|||
![]() |
10 | PUNKANGEL | 8,580 | 24th December 2008 - 11:33 AM Last post by: kpxchunsa |
|||
![]() |
22 | Marcella | 2,473 | 24th December 2008 - 03:54 AM Last post by: chifro |
|||
![]() |
9 | WeaponX | 1,724 | 20th December 2008 - 08:38 AM Last post by: iG-kavyaguddu |
|||
![]() |
11 | sandeep | 2,307 | 15th December 2008 - 07:04 AM Last post by: iG-robert |
|||
![]() |
11 | lapis | 1,343 | 14th December 2008 - 09:07 PM Last post by: iG-smk34 |
|||
![]() |
4 | laniczech | 265 | 12th December 2008 - 02:06 AM Last post by: quack |
|||
![]() |
2 | TavoxPeru | 267 | 10th December 2008 - 12:21 AM Last post by: Sellaman |
|||
![]() |
16 | JasPuneet | 842 | 10th December 2008 - 12:09 AM Last post by: Sellaman |
|||
![]() |
8 | iceblade | 1,396 | 6th December 2008 - 12:59 PM Last post by: iG-David |
|||
![]() |
11 | BHerath | 1,354 | 6th December 2008 - 09:47 AM Last post by: TehJohn |
|||
![]() |
4 | psionics | 270 | 4th December 2008 - 11:36 PM Last post by: Quatrux |
|||
![]() |
8 | nakulgupta | 2,039 | 4th December 2008 - 05:26 AM Last post by: iG-tohir |
|||
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 8th January 2009 - 05:06 AM |
© 2009 AstaHost: Free Web Hosting & Technical Discussion, Free Web Hosting. a member of xisto.
Powered by Invision Board. Skin: IPB Forum Skins
Expand / Collapse Navigation



Nov 18 2005, 01:48 AM





