Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )




                Web Hosting

 
Reply to this topicNew Topic
Cable Sharing Problem, ..unequal bandwidth
Grafitti
post Jun 2 2006, 03:24 AM
Post #1


Premium Idiot
Group Icon

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 661
Joined: 9-July 05
From: Switzerland, but currently in Pakistan
Member No.: 6,943


I have a 128k connection that is shared between 6 computers. one computer connects directly to the internet and the others connect through this shared connection. Now I know that already, this is not a good idea, because 128k split over so many will really slow it down, but until I can get a second line there's really no way around it. And I know that the host computer will take the lion's share of the bandwidth. My question is:
How can I make sure that the remaining speed is divided equally between the other computers? Right now one or two other computers will have a decent connection through, but the other 3 simply won't connect most of the time, or I have a 0.5kb connection speed, which makes web pages and outlook express mail time out constantly. I would really appreciate a solution to this.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitShift
post Jun 2 2006, 06:30 AM
Post #2


Advanced Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 153
Joined: 8-May 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 13,291


from wut ive heard thats extremely hard, expecially since your internet is slow to begin with, since you dont have very much bandwidth to go around in the first place
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
yordan
post Jun 2 2006, 04:48 PM
Post #3


Way Out Of Control - You need a life :)
Group Icon

Group: [MODERATOR]
Posts: 2,296
Joined: 16-August 05
Member No.: 7,896
myCENTs:25.55


I guess that each server will try to get the whole available bandwidth. This is the best way when a single guy is really working, and the other ones do nothing. As soon as one guy needs bandwith, he obtains everything. If two or three guys try to download simultaneously, the bandwidht will be shared "almost" equally, simply the fastest system will get most of the Ethernet packets, the slowest machine will go slower.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grafitti
post Jun 3 2006, 04:43 AM
Post #4


Premium Idiot
Group Icon

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 661
Joined: 9-July 05
From: Switzerland, but currently in Pakistan
Member No.: 6,943


Ok, that brings up another question though. Because I have a 3.0 Ghz machine and 5 2.4 Ghz ones. On my 3 gig i run file-sharing, but if i totally close it down, or not open it when i log on (i don't have it set to automatically start), I still have "no" internet, or extremely slow. Even the Google search page can take 20 or 30 seconds to load. So it appears as if the connection is basically dead. then if i start up filesharing, right away i get a download speed of at least 10KB, and the same thing happens when i use download accelerator. I get a decent (for me) connection. but browsers and OE simply can't seem to find that connection properly. Then another question, yordan, if i turn off my 3 gig machine, and all the rest are exact equals in spex, and installed all the same, why will 2 of them get a connection and the other 3 simply won't?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ziller
post Jun 18 2006, 01:59 AM
Post #5


Newbie [ Level 1 ]
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 18-June 06
Member No.: 13,993


I think that the speed... it just to little for 6 machines
you get about 3kb or 2kb speed per machine...
that speed is less than the speed provided by the
phone-modem... you should get a better speed and
try using any net or proxy manager program..
and I believe that there is an option to limit the speed
for each of the machines in the net..

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicNew Topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Collapse

> Similar Topics

    Topic Title Replies Topic Starter Views Last Action
No New Posts   4 Darkeme 37 Yesterday, 09:57 PM
Last post by: Darkeme
No New Posts   4 TavoxPeru 100 3rd January 2009 - 09:50 PM
Last post by: Quatrux
No New Posts   6 jess704 151 2nd January 2009 - 11:17 AM
Last post by: sakmac
No New Posts   4 jlhaslip 924 30th December 2008 - 08:50 PM
Last post by: iG-
No New Posts   14 ikenalleenik 2,284 30th December 2008 - 01:22 PM
Last post by: iG-saumyadeep
No new 21 tamuna90 1,642 29th December 2008 - 06:55 PM
Last post by: iG-Mick
No New Posts   5 Vicious_AD 909 29th December 2008 - 09:51 AM
Last post by: iG-abdullah
No new   22 Marcella 2,497 24th December 2008 - 03:54 AM
Last post by: chifro
No New Posts   9 WeaponX 1,737 20th December 2008 - 08:38 AM
Last post by: iG-kavyaguddu
No New Posts   8 laniczech 229 5th December 2008 - 10:24 AM
Last post by: wutske
No New Posts   7 Logan Deathbringer 1,345 5th December 2008 - 02:01 AM
Last post by: xboxrulz
No New Posts   6 irwan6179 1,460 1st December 2008 - 07:58 PM
Last post by: iG-patrik
No New Posts   14 victorhu 3,404 30th November 2008 - 06:48 AM
Last post by: iG-Roger
No New Posts   11 halfpint 328 27th November 2008 - 06:21 PM
Last post by: halfpint
No New Posts   11 hoplite 1,720 26th November 2008 - 12:34 PM
Last post by: iG-pandawarne