Could the mods please move this to the right place, just deleat it if you don't like it.
I AM NOT SAYING 9/11/2001 WAS GOOD IT JUST WAS TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF AND MADE SOMEWHAT BETTER!
This not made up spam. You will learn that everything I have to say is very true.
OK like my title? Well it got your attention.
OK so starting a few years ago pollution was made illegal in the U.S. to slow down global warming. Turns out it is doing just the opposite. By cutting down on pollution we are making earth hotter! A new study has shown that there are two types of gasses on earth, ones that make it cooler and one that make it hotter. A few years back we had a "close to balanced" almost equilibrium with high energy. But now that we have cut back on the "COLD" gasses the hot ones are starting to take over. This will cause effects to our planet never thought of before. I won't go into what will happen in this post. OK so anyway, the only way to test this "theory" is to find a place with the "colder" gasses and then take them away and see if the temperature increases. A good place is the U.S.A. with all the air travel water vapor comes off wings of jets and cools down the earth. But, on 9/11/2001 the world stopped and was amazed. Air-travel all across the U.S. was stopped for 3 days. In these 3 days the temperature went up more than it ever had is 100's of years in the shortest amount of time. We found the answer, We need to keep the pollution balanced at a low level of equilibrium. To do this we need to find alturnitives to oil and use the info that we learned from this sad event.

I would personally thank all the people that have died from 9/11 or are in war today. They saved use in more ways than just one.

Thanks for reading,
Sparkx

If you have any problems what so ever about this post please just reply to it, Ill take it down.

This post has been edited by sparkx: Oct 12 2006, 08:35 PM

That is an interesting theory. Can you provide a link to a scientific site with an explanation of cool and warm gases?

I think that may be a valid field of exploration! We ought to see if it really has any bearing on global warming.

Well I don't have a link, let me check, I saw it off of nova a few weeks ago. I'm guessing its somewhere on this page: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sun/

I would definitely need to see the sources to believe any of that... No offense '=)

That, my freind, is exactly why I posted it in a reply. I got it from Nova (if you dont thin nova is a good source I dont know what is).

Interesting theory but it sounds way too simplistic.

Most likely, there is probably a more in-depth reason to this theory then just "cold gases and warm gases".
That could be the basic idea and the basis of the theory but I'm sure if the theory exists then it goes much deeper and has much more factors then just certain gases being displaced by planes.

You also have to consider the time of year, what was considered "extreme temperature rises", if there were any major storms brewing in the Atlantic at the time. There are a lot of factors to consider and I'm sure that is why it has not been heard of because initial research is probably still taking place so they can get some real evidence and data from controlled experiments.

I'll check back here later to see if you have posted a link to the source you acquired this information from.

This post has been edited by BitShift: Oct 13 2006, 01:03 AM

OK for the last time the link is: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sun/
Nova used way more "scientific word" I just made a summery of a 1 hour show. They have proof. It wasn't just in New York that temp. were rising it was everywhere in the US, Canada and Mexico. You could say it all just happened to have the biggest temp. increase for a long time (just like they expected would happen) this happened over the 3 days where planes were not flying. I guess you could say that Nova was wrong just because I didn't use "scientific" words.

Sorry, but I definitively do not accept this kind of words.
Here we are on the Earth, most of gases are two : 20% Oxygen and 80% Nitrogen, and some very few other ones. So, there is no "cold" or "hot" thing.
We could imagine that some type of pollution (deleting the Ozone layers) could increase the temperature ; and some other pollution (mainly solid particles coming when coal is burning) hide the sun rays and make a "cold" effect.
I know that real life is a balance of several factors in our biotope.
But I will not accept this words of "cold gas" and "hot gas" balance.
Sorry, but if you have no better arguments, you should stop talking about this subject.

But Nova doesn't present their source either, there is no actual data there, only the conclusions.

Well... I would have hoped that they checked it before putting it on national television? I guess you guys are smarter about this subject then the scientist that worked for years to come to this conclusion? I guess I'll just start listing to you guys rather then paying attention to school. And the two different gasses don't "Directly" affect the temp. They just help it go into that direction. When the "green house" gasses get stuck in our atmosphere its not the gas itself that heats up the earth, Its the fact that sun can't leave. The other gasses do the opposite, they make it harder for the sun and heat to even get into the atmosphere. So maby I confused you by saying "hot" and "cold" gasses is what effects the temp. As for nova, they do list there sources check out this list of people that helped:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sun/credits.html
and all the websites:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sun/resources.html